Take the 2-minute tour ×
Hinduism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for followers of the Hindu religion and those interested in learning more about Hinduism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have always believed that lord Rama was a vegetarian, but after reading the certain blogs I found out that there might be certain verses in Ramayana which indicate quite the opposite.

idaM medhyamidaM svaadu niSTaptamidamagninaa |
evamaaste sa dharmaatmaa siitayaa saha raaghavaH || 2-96-2

Rama, whose mind was devoted to righteousness stayed there with Seetha, saying; "This meat is fresh, this is savoury and roasted in the fire."

Now, since I haven't read the entire Ramayana, I cannot attest to the fact that whether Rama was a vegetarian or non-vegetarian.

Which is why I need to ask, is there some concrete proof that Rama was a meat eater.

Reference

share|improve this question
    
you have valmiki-ramayana as a concrete proof, what more do you want? –  Vineet Menon Jul 11 at 6:03
3  
The thing is, anyone can add a verse on a website. As there might be an interpretation error I wanted to ask was, if there is a scholar who studies the Ramayana quite intricately, then they could throw some light on this topic. –  anon456 Jul 11 at 6:09
    
@anon456, fair enough.. –  Vineet Menon Jul 11 at 7:15
1  
Poor Ramayana has been subject to racist and castist interpretation by the western indology and marxist gangs. Remember that Ramayana was poetry and hence there would be many metaphoric words which cannot be taken literally. –  Bharat Jul 11 at 15:11

3 Answers 3

Aamisham means meat and it also means enjoyable sense object like kingdom; it also means immense sense gratification and very pleasant and dear sense objects. Why translate this word only to mean meat? Isn't it biased translation?

Maamsa means meat and it also means pulp of a fruit or root. Roots are quite commonly roasted in fire and eaten.

Sloka 5-36-41 can also mean that Raghuvamsi never eat meat nor do they drink liquor.

share|improve this answer
1  
Verse 5:36:41 says "Rama is not eating meat, nor indulging even in spirituous liquor. Everyday, in the evening, he is eating the food existing in the forest, well arranged for him.." That just means that he's abstaining from the pleasures of life while he is apart from Sita. –  Keshav Srinivasan Jul 11 at 6:32
3  
"wrong translation" point I want to make –  atom217 Jul 11 at 6:34

I have no good evidence in the subject "Is Ram a Vegetarian ?" but i am sure he was a vegetarian. Because he was also known as MARIYADAPURSHOTTAM. and many of saints(sadhus) who i met, always tell me one thing: if you want to follow a person then follow Ram ; But if you want to listen, the listen to krishna. So i think Ram is the man who tells us how to live, and that is way how I say he never ate meat because he knew that people would follow him.

share|improve this answer

I am a practising Hindu and Brahmin with a reasonable knowledge of Ramayana and some of its different versions.

As far as I know meat eating is not restricted to any Hindu Caste,while in general South Indian Brahmins practise vegetarianism. Bengali Brahmins eat fish,Kashmiri Brahmins eat meat.

Further Rama is a Kshatriya ( Warrior Class ) son of King Dasaratha. Hence I do not see any reason why he should be a vegetarian. Hence in my opinion,there is no issue whether he is vegetarian or not

share|improve this answer
    
Valid point. But while it supports the question, it doesn't answer it. –  LVS 4 hours ago

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.