Take the 2-minute tour ×
Hinduism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for followers of the Hindu religion and those interested in learning more about Hinduism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have always believed that lord Rama was a vegetarian, but after reading the certain blogs I found out that there might be certain verses in Ramayana which indicate quite the opposite.

idaM medhyamidaM svaadu niSTaptamidamagninaa |
evamaaste sa dharmaatmaa siitayaa saha raaghavaH || 2-96-2

Rama, whose mind was devoted to righteousness stayed there with Seetha, saying; "This meat is fresh, this is savoury and roasted in the fire."

Now, since I haven't read the entire Ramayana, I cannot attest to the fact that whether Rama was a vegetarian or non-vegetarian.

Which is why I need to ask, is there some concrete proof that Rama was a meat eater?

Reference :

share|improve this question
you have valmiki-ramayana as a concrete proof, what more do you want? –  Vineet Menon Jul 11 '14 at 6:03
The thing is, anyone can add a verse on a website. As there might be an interpretation error I wanted to ask was, if there is a scholar who studies the Ramayana quite intricately, then they could throw some light on this topic. –  anon456 Jul 11 '14 at 6:09
@anon456, fair enough.. –  Vineet Menon Jul 11 '14 at 7:15
Poor Ramayana has been subject to racist and castist interpretation by the western indology and marxist gangs. Remember that Ramayana was poetry and hence there would be many metaphoric words which cannot be taken literally. –  Bharat Jul 11 '14 at 15:11
Rama wore 'janaiu' which prohibate tamsic food eg meat & wine. –  Purushottam Oct 22 '14 at 16:12

5 Answers 5

Aamisham means meat and it also means enjoyable sense object like kingdom; it also means immense sense gratification and very pleasant and dear sense objects. Why translate this word only to mean meat? Isn't it biased translation?

Maamsa means meat and it also means pulp of a fruit or root. Roots are quite commonly roasted in fire and eaten.

Sloka 5-36-41 can also mean that Raghuvamsi never eat meat nor do they drink liquor.

share|improve this answer
Verse 5:36:41 says "Rama is not eating meat, nor indulging even in spirituous liquor. Everyday, in the evening, he is eating the food existing in the forest, well arranged for him.." That just means that he's abstaining from the pleasures of life while he is apart from Sita. –  Keshav Srinivasan Jul 11 '14 at 6:32
"wrong translation" point I want to make –  atom217 Jul 11 '14 at 6:34

I have no good evidence in the subject "Is Ram a Vegetarian ?" but I am sure he was a vegetarian. Because he was also known as MARIYADAPURSHOTTAM and many of saints(sadhus) who I met, always tell me one thing: if you want to follow a person then follow Ram ; But if you want to listen, the listen to krishna. So I think Ram is the man who tells us how to live, and that is way how I say he never ate meat because he knew that people would follow him.

share|improve this answer
being vegetarian and being saint is no where co related. Swami Vivekananda was a fish eater Bengali Brahmin. There is no point of mixing two things –  atom217 Oct 15 '14 at 9:13
@atom217 Swami Vivekananda was not a brahmin. –  moonstar2001 Dec 26 '14 at 0:20

Most of these blogs and website are run by anti-Hindu people who want to malign Hinduism. And no Lord Rama was not non-vegetarian. He was pure vegetarian. He was the embodiment of Dharma itself then how can Lord engage in adharma?

share|improve this answer
While it may be true that there are elements attempting to malign Hinduism, it is incorrect to believe non-vegetarianism is adharma. It is dharma for kshatriyas and sudras. However, there are rules to consuming meat such as eschewing it on specific days, tithis etc. –  moonstar2001 Dec 26 '14 at 0:22

Yes. Rama is a kshatriya and kshatriyas are sanctioned to eat meat. For, meat increases rajas and tamas in the body which are required in warfare. Ramayana (Aranya KAnda) clearly states that he hunted for a deer and they offered it as naivEdyam (offering to God made during ritual worship) when they first set up their hermitage. In sundara kAnDa also, hanuman tells sita that Rama has taken no pleasure in meat or madhu since being separated from her.

Caution for sanctioned meat-eaters is that meat should be consumed only on some days. For e.g., they should eschew eating meat on Sundays.

Rama did not violate scriptural injunctions or dharma by consuming meat.

share|improve this answer
You should give specific citations and/or quotes from the Aranya Kanda and the Sundara Kanda. You can read the Valmiki Ramayana at valmikiramayan.net –  Keshav Srinivasan Dec 24 '14 at 5:40

I am a practicing Hindu and Brahmin with a reasonable knowledge of Ramayana and some of its different versions.

As far as I know meat eating is not restricted to any Hindu Caste, while in general South Indian Brahmins practice vegetarianism. Bengali Brahmins eat fish, Kashmiri Brahmins eat meat.

Further Rama is a Kshatriya(Warrior Class) son of King Dasaratha. Hence I do not see any reason why he should be a vegetarian. Hence in my opinion, there is no issue whether he is vegetarian or not.

share|improve this answer
Valid point. But while it supports the question, it doesn't answer it. –  LVS Jul 29 '14 at 15:56
Just because North Indian brahmins eat it, does not make it okay or acceptable janAcAra. A brahmin must not partake of meat. –  moonstar2001 Dec 26 '14 at 0:23

protected by Community Mar 10 at 18:51

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.