Take the 2-minute tour ×
Hinduism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for followers of the Hindu religion and those interested in learning more about Hinduism. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As we know there were many people who could have killed Ravana like lord Hanuman and Jambvan. But they didn't kill Ravana.

What is the reason behind this?

share|improve this question
    
Hanuman and everyone else knew that they can kill Ravana, but abduction of Sita was directly linked with Lord Rama. –  user541 Jul 25 at 4:41

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

One important reason goes far back to even before Ravana was born. Ravan was actually one of the two gatekeepers at Lord Vishnu's abode Vaikuntha. Once, they stopped the four Sanat kumaras from entering into Vaikuntha and they got cursed. So they took take birth in demonic families as the Lord had desired:

The Lord replied: O brāhmaṇas, know that the punishment you inflicted on them was originally ordained by Me, and therefore they will fall to a birth in a demoniac family. But they will be firmly united with Me in thought through mental concentration intensified by anger, and they will return to My presence shortly. [SB - 3.6.26]

They later on took birth as Hiranakshya, Hirankashyapu in Satya Yuga, Ravana, Kumbhakrana in Treta Yuga, and Kamsa, Sisupala in Dwapara Yuga. So for their deliverance, Vishnu in His avatars had to kill them. So only Lord Rama Killed Ravana.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes you are right but I think lord Hanuman or Jambvan didn't kill Ravana because of this reason right? –  Mr_Green Jul 24 at 10:15
    
@Mr_Green Yes, because it has already been settled way way back. But from the point of view the world, as Kedarnath had mentioned, out of haughtiness Ravana thought no man or monkey could kill him, because they were too weak. So while asking boon, he ignored them and Lord took birth as a Human. And even though Hanuman, Angad, were powerful, they wanted their Lord Rama to have the honor, because Ravana had shown enmity towards Him by taking away maa Sita. –  jabahar Jul 24 at 10:22

Jambvan can't kill Ravana, because Ravana has boon that only Monkey or Man ( Narayan in man form) can kill him. Jambvan is form of bear.

When Ravana meet first time to Lord Hanuman, that time he told him that He is Amar ( a person that can't be died ). Listening to this, Lord Hamuman remain him his boon that Ravana was bless to only killed by Monkey or Narayan ( i.e. Lord Vishnu ).

Hanuman told him that he too can kill Ravana at that very moment but he wanted Lord Rama to get credit of killing Ravana, that's why he didnt kill him.

share|improve this answer
1  
How can you say that Lord Hanuman wanted Lord Rama to get the credit of killing Ravana? Can you give some kind of source for it? –  DroidDev Jul 24 at 10:42

As pointed out above, ravana could only be killed by a vaanar(monkey) or a manushya(human).

Secondly, when hanuman met ravana for the first time, he went as a doot(ambasador) and couldn't fight with ravana.

Also, you always fight with a person of your stature, therefore, ravana(leader of rakshasa) fought with lord Rama.

share|improve this answer
    
When lord Hanuman went to lanka for first time, he was actually searching for Sita. nobody was sure whether they could find her here or not. lord Hanuman was looking in that direction because Sampati (brother of Jatayu) told him that he saw a pushpak vimaan going in this direction. So, lord Hanuman didn't go as a doot (messenger). –  Mr_Green Jul 25 at 6:27
    
Later, Angad went as a doot though. –  Mr_Green Jul 25 at 6:42

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.