Timeline for Is Maya superior to Brahman as per Advaita philosophy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2021 at 12:31 | history | notice removed | The Destroyer♦ | ||
| Jun 9, 2021 at 10:31 | history | edited | Pradip Gangopadhyay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 436 characters in body
|
| Jun 8, 2021 at 12:53 | history | notice added | The Destroyer♦ | Needs citation | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 15:11 | comment | added | Pradip Gangopadhyay | This is not a very unusual situation. We cannot intellectually understand maya just as we cannot intellectually understand Brahman. One of the names for Brahman according to Advaita Vedanta is silence since It is inexplicable although all of us are from It. If Brahman could be understood intellectually then it would have been discovered by science by now. | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 12:33 | comment | added | ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ | You're saying Māyā is inexplicable, but you're saying it explains the existence of universe. How wonderful something inexplicable by itself explaining something else. Btw, saying "Māyā explains the existence..." is a fact about Māyā, it means something is explicable about Māyā. In short, somewhere Māyā is explicable somewhere not ,by Advaitins. And they decide where it is not. | |
| Mar 28, 2017 at 11:22 | comment | added | Pradip Gangopadhyay | Brahman is inert. Maya explains the existence of the universe even if the universe turns out to be unreal to the Jivanmukta. | |
| Mar 27, 2017 at 8:19 | comment | added | ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ | If Māyā is inexplicable or unknown why at the first place anything being said about Māyā? | |
| May 26, 2016 at 16:55 | history | answered | Pradip Gangopadhyay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |