Timeline for How does Vishishtadvaita interpret "Brahma Ved Brahmaiva Bhavati"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 21, 2017 at 15:35 | history | edited | Keshav Srinivasan♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 11, 2017 at 5:13 | history | edited | Keshav Srinivasan♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 10, 2017 at 17:53 | vote | accept | Pandya♦ | ||
Mar 10, 2017 at 17:07 | answer | added | Keshav Srinivasan♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 31, 2016 at 15:50 | comment | added | brahma jijnasa | I'm talking about the bold part which sounding Advaita. Before you start to think about this question I think you should know that that question actually doesn't sound like it is something that Advaita teach. And this is so because per the Shankara's Advaita you already are Brahman and thus it make no sense to say that you will "become" Brahman. Actually when I think about that verse it sounds to me as if it is written according to some vaishnava system of Vedanta. Just saying ... :) | |
Oct 26, 2016 at 14:10 | comment | added | Keshav Srinivasan♦ | @ShreeKrishna In Visistadvaita there is only one Brahman. He is Saguna and he is supreme. Are you trying to say that the Jiva is part of Brahman, not that Brahman is part of Brahman? | |
Oct 26, 2016 at 14:06 | comment | added | Pandya♦ | @ShreeKrishna what do you mean by Brahman and Supreme Brahman according to Vishsihtadvaita? | |
Oct 24, 2016 at 12:31 | comment | added | Shree Krishna | As I understood vishishtadvaita philosophy Brahman is part of the Supreme Brahman not the whole. So, When He knows the Supreme he(Brahman) becomes dissolve in Supreme like Advaita (Non duality) but as same time he does not lose his identity like Dvaita (Duality). | |
Oct 24, 2016 at 7:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Oct 24, 2016 at 10:45 | |||||
Oct 23, 2016 at 4:54 | history | asked | Pandya♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |