Timeline for Why didn't Ravana use the Chandrahasa sword against Lord Rama?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jun 8, 2023 at 1:46 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Jatayu was not an eagle. He was great vulture. Him and his brother were considered vulture kings.
|
Jun 7, 2023 at 20:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 8, 2023 at 1:46 | |||||
Jun 26, 2017 at 11:52 | history | edited | Sarvabhouma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated the answer
|
May 28, 2017 at 17:00 | comment | added | user1195 | @sv :-) Its not ravana's pov that matters, is it? dharma (and justice) is not about opinions and pov. If a drug dealer shoots a cop because the cop was about to draw fire, will he be acquitted on the basis of self-defense? He will be convicted on two counts- drug trafficking and homicide. (Probably others too such as violence against a law enforcement officer and what not. IANAL obvously). | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 13:19 | comment | added | Say No To Censorship | From Ravana's POV, he used it for self-defense not adharma. | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 5:24 | comment | added | Sarvabhouma | @sv. The criteria mentioned by Shiva has been fulfilled. Isn't abducting one's wife forcefully an adharma? It is misused and so it should have been returned to Shiva. | |
Mar 5, 2017 at 13:55 | comment | added | Say No To Censorship | If the sword did really return to Shiva, don't you think Valmiki would've mentioned it? To use the sword in the main battle against Rama he needs to be very close but he wasn't which is why the sword is not mentioned again. | |
Feb 23, 2017 at 14:04 | history | bounty ended | Sakthi | ||
Feb 23, 2017 at 14:04 | vote | accept | Sakthi | ||
Feb 23, 2017 at 11:00 | history | edited | Sarvabhouma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 127 characters in body
|
Feb 23, 2017 at 10:23 | history | edited | Sarvabhouma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
Feb 23, 2017 at 10:16 | history | answered | Sarvabhouma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |