In both Vedic and Agamic Dharmas, a Guru has to be someone who is alive. I too have some friend who considers Adi Shankara as his Guru.
But unless he takes DikshA from a living Guru he will be considered technically aas an uninitiate (adikshita) only. Such mentally accepting someone as one's Guru may look fancy but does not really work. (Having said that in very rare cases, one is allowed to accept Lord Shiva or Mother Goddess as their Guide-Guru but that's an exception not a rule).
So, obviously, the teacher or Guru has to be alive to initiate the student and teach him (the disciplestudent) the Vedas.
So, it is more than obvious now that we are talking about a living Guru here.
In Agamic DikshA SamskAra too, a Guru has to be alive in order to transfer energy, consciousness, mantras etc ontointo the disciple. The following verse defines who is the Guru more precisely.
DikshA is actually a process where the Guru gives mantra into Shisya's ears by chanting it a particular number of times. Their nearness (sAmipyasAmippya) is essential in the process. Needless to say, both have to be alive in order to participate.
Now, obviously Guru whoonly if he is alive can conduct such tests and can be the subject of such tests.
Well, such persons have not actually become your Gurus"Gurus". So, there is no harm in mentally accepting more than one such Saints as your mentors or protectors.
AnywaysAnd, even in case of actual Gurus, having more than one Gurus is allowed ( I myself have two Gurus).
MadhuluvedhA yathA bhringah pushpAt pushAntaram vrajet |
JyAna luvdha
stathA shishyah guro gurvantra vrajet ||
.........
Just like the bee, desirous of honey, moves from one flower to the
other, a disciple, desirous of knowledge, can likewise move from one
Guru to another.
KT 13.132
However, there can be some exceptional kinds of Gurus. Anyone or anything who (which) teaches you something is your Guru.