Skip to main content
added 12 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Sarvabhouma
  • 26k
  • 11
  • 126
  • 205

This is a celebrated case - the claim that Panini's grammar makes "Narayana" with the retroflex n at the end a proper noun and that ONLYonly the Vaishnavite God can be meant.

Obviously this cannot be a huge issue for GaudiyasGaudiya Vaishnavas and Ramanandis to whom the supreme God is Krishna and Rama respectively.

This is a celebrated case - the claim that Panini's grammar makes "Narayana" with the retroflex n at the end a proper noun and that ONLY the Vaishnavite God can be meant.

Obviously this cannot be a huge issue for Gaudiyas and Ramanandis to whom the supreme God is Krishna and Rama respectively.

This is a celebrated case - the claim that Panini's grammar makes "Narayana" with the retroflex n at the end a proper noun and that only the Vaishnavite God can be meant.

Obviously this cannot be a huge issue for Gaudiya Vaishnavas and Ramanandis to whom the supreme God is Krishna and Rama respectively.

edited title
Link
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
  • 15.7k
  • 7
  • 64
  • 119

Are SriVaishnavites Is Sri Vaishnavism the only Vaishnavite sect that claims "Narayana" is a proper noun that can ONLY denote Vishnu?

edited tags
Link
Sarvabhouma
  • 26k
  • 11
  • 126
  • 205
Source Link
S K
  • 1
  • 4
  • 26
  • 86
Loading