Timeline for What are the views of Gaudiya Vaishnavism on Adi Shankaracharya?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2019 at 10:20 | history | edited | user9969 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 15, 2019 at 5:10 | comment | added | user17294 | @Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury thnx so mch | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 5:00 | comment | added | user9969 | @Partha It seems Gaudiya Vaishnavas would interpret it to explain that Hari is untouched/not influenced by the three gunas and hence Nirguna. Now, if you want to know what Jiva Goswami says, check this book in Sanskrit: archive.org/details/… (I can't read Sanskrit so I can't tell you myself) | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 4:26 | comment | added | user17294 | @AkshayS yes thats true with the ISKCON gita :D | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 4:25 | comment | added | user17294 | @SuryaKantaBoseChowdhury okay, how is it explained? | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 3:46 | comment | added | user9969 | @Partha I got your verse. It's actually in the tenth canto. | |
| Feb 15, 2019 at 2:29 | comment | added | Agamas Tantras | @Partha i think as you pointed translations are wrong. Even in Gita, Avyakta akshara, Param Purusha is wrongly translated as personality of Godhead.... | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 19:04 | comment | added | user9969 | @Partha I'll check | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 18:14 | comment | added | user17294 | The sloka that reads: Harir hi nirguno sakshad? | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 18:09 | comment | added | user9969 | @Partha Is it Srimad Bhagavatam 11.25.27? | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 18:02 | comment | added | user9969 | @Partha Can you tell me the exact verse actually? | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 17:55 | comment | added | user17294 | what did Sripad Jiva Goswami say about the 11thncanto of Srimad-Bhagavatam where Hari is referred to as Nirguna and He Himself advised Jnanamarga? | |
| Feb 14, 2019 at 16:43 | history | answered | user9969 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |