We all know that Vibhishana was a Brahmin-Daitya/Brahmin-Rakshas and was an ardent follower of Lord Rama. But he did not even kill a single person in the Ram-Ravana war. In my belief he should not be called an Asur as he did not have any similar characteristics. So, was he strong and wielded a weapon ?

We all know that Vibhishana was a Brahmin-Daitya/Brahmin-Rakshasa and was an ardent follower of Lord Rama. But I think he didn't kill even a single person in the Rama-Ravana war. So, in my view, he shouldn't be called an asura as he did not have any asura-like qualities.

But does Ramayana talk about Vibhishana being a strong warrior or if he wielded any weapons?

We all know that Vibhisena was a Brahmin-Daitya and was an ardent follower of Lord Rama. But he did not even kill a single asur in the Ram-Ravana war. In my belief he should not be called an Asur as he did not have any similar characteristics. So, was he strong and wielded a weapon ?

We all know that Vibhishana was a Brahmin-Daitya/Brahmin-Rakshas and was an ardent follower of Lord Rama. But he did not even kill a single person in the Ram-Ravana war. In my belief he should not be called an Asur as he did not have any similar characteristics. So, was he strong and wielded a weapon ?