Timeline for How have traditional Vedic commentators interpreted Shukla Yajurveda 26.2?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 days ago | comment | added | RamAbloh | The question is quite clear and my answer clears the misconceptions raised in the question. If I must nitpick, I would say that the question assumes many things, and does not clarify the term "neo-Vedantins" which is thrown around a lot. I have steered clear of all unclear terms and answered the heart of the question - what do traditional commenters say on the mantra. | |
| Dec 3 at 6:37 | comment | added | Artist Formerly Known As CSD | @RamAbloh - See the question. "The above verse has been used by Neo-Vedantins to claim that everyone is allowed to study the Vedas (or at least hear Vedic chanting)." The context of the question is quite clear. Your answer gives the sense that traditional commentators have agreed with neo-vendantins. If not so be it | |
| Nov 29 at 22:41 | comment | added | RamAbloh | You have misunderstood both the question and my answer. The question asked how have traditional commentators explained this mantra. I gave two commentaries. My answer doesn't claim that Vedas can be chanted by everyone. The import of the mantra is that the Vedic teachings are meant for all human beings. That is all I have written. Re-read my last sentence - "So the Veda itself says that it is for the benefit of all classes of society and for all people, domestic and foreign." | |
| Nov 30, 2023 at 12:53 | comment | added | Singh S1 | तस्मात् शुद्रोयज्ञेऽनवक्लृप्त: means Therefore, the Sudra is not fit for the sacrifice. | |
| Sep 23, 2021 at 6:49 | history | answered | Artist Formerly Known As CSD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |