Skip to main content

Timeline for Kekaya and Magadha

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 26 at 7:36 comment added Vom @Bingming , do you know the answer to this question? hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/59479/…
May 24 at 16:33 comment added Vom Let us continue this discussion in chat.
May 24 at 16:32 comment added Vom @Bingming , in 2.70.1-2 , the messangers are said to have met Yudhājit in Rājagṛha.
May 24 at 16:19 comment added Bingming Anyway, I checked the commentaries on 2.68.21, the comms. Amṛtakataka and Tilaka state that Girivraja is Kekayapura and is also known as Rājagṛha. Other comms. such as Bhūṣaṇa, Tattvadīpikā, Śiromaṇī, etc. state that Girivraja is Kekayapura, but don't mention Rājagṛha.
May 24 at 16:10 comment added Bingming may I ask, what is the śloka where they are mentioned to be in Rājagṛha?
May 24 at 16:05 comment added Vom @Bingming , well Rājagṛha is mentioned as the City where Bharata , Śatrughna , Bharata's uncle Yudhājit and Aśvapati Kaikeya were present. So it might be the capital. So is Girivraja a different city than Rājagṛha?
May 24 at 15:26 comment added Bingming Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa doesn't mention Rājagṛha as the capital afaik, plus you equated both places, what was the basis of doing so? This question is still not answered.
May 24 at 15:13 comment added Vom @Bingming , In the Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇam 2.68.21 , The messangers of Ayodhyā are said to have reached "Girivraja" , although this Verse is not present in the Critical Addition. In the Critical the word "Girivraja" , as I've stated in the question occurs only once and that to for a city different from the Kekaya capital. Even in the Vulgate version of the Rāmāyaṇa , the name Girivraja occurs twice , once in 2.68.21 and other in the Bāla Kāṇḍa where it is used for a different city than the Kekaya metropolis.
May 24 at 14:34 comment added Bingming On what basis did you conclude that Girivraja is the same place as Rājagṛha?
May 23 at 7:31 history asked Vom CC BY-SA 4.0