In this excerpt from the Garuda Purana, various incarnations of Vayu the wind god are described. In particular, it says this:

When lord Rama incarnated on earth, Vayu was born as Hanuman for rendering assistance to Rama. When lord Krishna descended on earth, he was born as Bhima, the offspring of Vayu. Vayu will be born as Maniman daitya, known as Shankara. He will be so called, for he will abolish caste and destroy Dharma.

Now I think the part in bold is probably either the source or the product of Madhvacharya's belief that Adi Shankaracharya was a rebirth of a demon, described in this book:

Madhva believed himself to be an incarnation of Vayu, and probably as a result of Shankarite persecution, he taught that Shankara was a reincarnation of obscure demon named Manimat who appears in the Mahabharata.

In the Vana Parva of the Mahabharata, Bhima kills a demon named Manimat. Since Madhvacharya considered himself to be an incarnation of Vayu, he thought he was the rebirth of Bhima and Adi Shankaracharya was the rebirth of Manimat. For the record I find this whole line of thinking absurd; I consider Adi Shankaracharya to be an incarnation of Shiva as I discuss here. And besides, that Garuda Purana chapter identifies Shankara, not Madhva, as an incarnation of Vayu.

But I'm interested in a statement found later on in that chapter. The Garuda Purana also describes the incarnations of Vayu's wife Bharati, and in particular it says this:

Draupadi, the daughter of Drupada gave up her body together with her maidens. O lord of birds, she will be born in the Kali Yuga in the house of Shankara in the village of Karati.

Now Karati is the actual birthplace of Adi Shankaracharya. So my question is, who is this rebirth of Draupadi supposed to be?

The fact that she was born "in the house of Shankara" might indicate that she was Adi Shankaracharya's sister or something. But then again, if Adi Shankaracharya is being considered an incarnation of Vayu and this woman is being considered an incarnation of Vayu's wife Bharati, then the logical relation would be that of husband and wife. But the traditional biographies of Adi Shankaracharya make clear that he took up Sanyasa at a you age.

Is it possible that before he had become a Sanyasi, his mother was planning to have him marry some girl? Are there any biographies of Adi Shankracharya that shed light on who this rebirth of Draupadi may be?

  • 2
    I agree that this whole story is absurd. There is no record of sankaracharya getting arranged. 2ndly, didn't Draupadi's incarnation exist only ~5000 years ago?Isn't it outlandish that a divinity would keep on reincarnating quickly ( in the grand scheme of things, ~3k years is quick)? 3rdly, would a god (even if not a great god like shiva or vishnu) actually take up an avatar to destroy dharma instead of upholding it? – user1195 Feb 18 '16 at 3:26
  • 2
    @KeshavSrinivasan Some versions consider Draupadi as incarnation of kali, consort of Shiva. So, if Adi Shankara was Shiva, then she should be his fiance or relationship similar to it. BTW, Madhavacharya's allegations are baseless. Why did Garuna Purna consider Adi Shankara as avatar of Vayu while most of the people believe him as avatar of Shiva? – The Destroyer Feb 18 '16 at 8:20
  • 2
    @keshavSrinivasan Garuda purana never called that Vayu would be born as a demon. but says maniman would be born as a demon. why are you posting misleading stuff ? – Rakesh Joshi Oct 5 '16 at 8:39
  • 3
    maNimAnnAma daityastu shaN^karAkhyo bhaviShyati | sarveShAM saN^karaM yastu kariShyati na saMshayaH || 3:16:70 tena shaN^karanAmA.asau bhaviShyati khageshvara | dharmAn.h bhAgavatAn.h sarvAn.h vinashyati sarvathA || 3:16:71 who is saying these verses ? Vayu or some other ? – Rakesh Joshi Oct 5 '16 at 11:41
  • 3
    Thanks to @Rakesh Joshi's quoting the verse, I think the translator has erred - the Garuda Purana says Maniman will be born as Shankaracharya and Vayu will be born as Madhva (the son of Vasudeva) to confront Maniman's philosophy. – Surya Oct 5 '16 at 12:26

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by The Destroyer Oct 6 '16 at 19:31

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Browse other questions tagged .