Can anyone tell me why do Gaudiya Vaishnavas believe in Brahma Samhita?

  • 2
    It's because they believe Chaitanya Mahaprabhu to be the incarnation of Lord Vishnu. ... and as Chaitanya Mahaprabhu referred to Brahma Samhita.. so they believe it....it's like why Muslim believe in Quran... it's because they believe Mohhamed to be Prophet of Allaha.. so they believe it as revelations... so it's basically depends 'on what refrence are we standing to authenticate scripture..' for eg. We believe in Puranas because we believe Vyas wrote it and he being incarnation of Vishnu must have revealed it truly... similarly they believe Mahaprabhu to be incarnation of Lord Vishnu....
    – Tezz
    Commented Jun 4, 2016 at 11:19
  • @Tezz : I don't think then it is wise to follow, it's spread ignorance toward society and religion Commented Jun 4, 2016 at 11:20
  • 1
    Again, interesting that we discussed this in another question. The truth must be available to everyone, hope we find it, one day :)
    – ABcDexter
    Commented Jun 4, 2016 at 11:23
  • 1
    to AbcDexter: hahahaha ,brother ...that's funny Commented Jun 4, 2016 at 11:25
  • 1
    @ShreeKrishna I don't know much about authenticity of scriptures... KeshavSrinivasan knows much about it... you can ask him...
    – Tezz
    Commented Jun 4, 2016 at 11:26

3 Answers 3


Anyway, if I may, I would like to explain our reasoning behind why we accept unorthodox scriptures like the Brahma Samhita. There is unfortunately a lot of misconceptions about Gaudiya Vaishnavism and this is soiling the view the Hindu community has of it.

First of all, in Hinduism there are a lot of sects and sampradayas and they all have, at times, quite differing beliefs. This is because the acharyas of those sects use different shastras in order to support their siddhanta. The categorization of the Puranas, for example, as sattva,raja and tamo and the verses that contribute to this are accepted by the Vaishnav schools, but rejected by the others. Some Hindu Sampradayas accept only the Karma Khanda portions of the Vedas and reject the Upanishads. Even in the study of Vedanta, there is a lot of difference. The traditional 3 schools of Vedanta (Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhavacharya) focus on the prasthana-trayi, while we Gaudiyas for example, focus on Srimad Bhagavatam (as we interpret that to be the essence of Vedanta).

What, in essence, I am saying is that even Vedic authority derives itself from the Guru Parampara. It is the foundation of all knowledge, because the Guru (and acharyas) tell us which scripture is authentic and which are interpolated. That is why, we Gaudiyas accept Brahma Samhita, because it was a shastra which was believed by our acharyas (like Jiva Goswami and Bhaktivinoda Thakur) to be authentic. In Chaitanya Charitamrta it is told that Lord Chaitanya traveled to South India (Tamil Nadu) and found a copy of one chapter of the Samhita and copied it by hand. So Brahma Samhita is authentic to us, and the evidence is because Lord Chaitanya and our Acharyas accept it. In-fact this is the case for many if not all Sampradayas. For example one may raise the question; "Why should we accept the Prasthana Trayi? Such a concept is in-fact not found anywhere in Sruti or Smrti" The answer to that of-course is we accept Prathana Trayi because we have faith in the words of Acharyas like Sankaracharya and Ramanunajacharya who accepted them also. The source of all knowledge is in actuality faith in the Acharyas. Trying to approach the scriptures in any other way, will often lead a student to great confusion. That is why Sruti declares:

yasya deve parā bhaktir yathā deve tathā gurau
tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ prakāśante mahātmanaḥ

Only unto those great souls who have implicit faith in both the Lord and the spiritual master are all the imports of Vedic knowledge automatically revealed. (Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad 6.23)

  • 1
    Yeah , but you can't do offense to discriminate the lord form , I m not against the Krishna is Supreme ,I m against the discrimination which you made trough it, because if you can give the example of so call brahma samhita, then I can give the example of so many scriptures which all sampradaye accepted including your, because it is totally baseless and also worthless when create discriminate of lord's also....so that's my point I m disagree for brahma-samhita, because its make lots of contradictions to others scriptures also.. Commented Jun 8, 2016 at 15:15
  • 1
    And the point is that you can't consider only acharaya, but you have to consider shruti , other authentic scriptures and guru, if they all are right then the scriptures or upanisads are authentic.. Commented Jun 8, 2016 at 15:31
  • 2
    @ShreeKrishna Pranam. Before one can shout ignorance, one must know knowledge and that differs from Sampradaya to Sampradaya. One should respect the diversity, and understand why these differences are there, rather then call others ignorant. A Vaishnav is always humble and never sees faults in others. Just see how Rupa Goswami so respectfully welcomed Sriman Vallabhacharya. I don't think we are purposely spreading ignorance; simply following the instruction of the Guru Varga on our heads. /\ So I must humbly disagree here.
    – Nitai dasa
    Commented Jun 8, 2016 at 15:33
  • 1
    Yeah, but.that's true brother.. I feel it , I spent 1/5 years with iskcon. And mostly my friends from Iskcon, but the main thing is that you put so much discrimination in the people, I experienced it..so that's why Commented Jun 8, 2016 at 15:36
  • 1
    I m not simply put the things and make the story, that's the fact I m saying.. Commented Jun 8, 2016 at 15:37

Gaudiya Vaishnavas believe Lord Krishna is the Supreme Brahman and Brahma Samhita also describes the same.

Brahma Samhita 5.1:

īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ
anādir ādir govindaḥ sarva-kāraṇa-kāraṇam

Translation: Kṛṣṇa who is known as Govinda is the Supreme Godhead. He has an eternal blissful spiritual body. He is the origin of all. He has no other origin and He is the prime cause of all causes.

The above verse describes Lord Krishna is the origin of everything and all the other verses glorifies Him.

Why do they Gaudiya Vaishnavas believe in Brahma Samhita?

Because Brahma Samhita is one of the Pancharatra texts which are most popular among Vaishnavas.

Here is the list of Pancharatra agamas from wiki:

Agastya-Samhita, Aniruddha-Samhita, Ahirbudhnya Samhita, Brahma Samhita, Brihat-Brahma-Samhita, Isvara-Samhita, Kapinjala-Samhita, Garga Samhita, Gautama-Samhita, Citrasikhandi-Samhita, Jayakhya-Samhita.... (mentioned few from list)

It is also believed that there were 100 chapters in the Brahma Samhita. This 5th chapter is the only chapter available now and was discovered by Chaitanya.

And not only Gaudiya Vaishnavas but Nimbarka sect, Vallabhacharya sect, Pranami sect and Radha Vallabha sect also worship Lord Krishna as Supreme.

  • More importantly, that was re discovered by the founder of Gaudiya Vaishnavism Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. Commented Aug 11, 2017 at 10:57
  • 1
    @SS Yes and another important thing is that it is a pancharartra text.
    – user6981
    Commented Aug 11, 2017 at 15:50

पूर्ण: पूर्णावतारश्च श्यामो रामो रघुद्वह:।

अंशा नृसिंह कृष्णाध्या राघवो भगवान स्वयम्।।

  • brahma samhita

Full incarnations are shyam (Krishna) Varna raghav (meaning shri Ram). But narsimha and krishna are partial incarnations , shri Ramchandra is swaym bhagwan

रामेति वर्णद्वयमादरेण सदा स्मरन्मुक्तिमुपैति जन्तुः ।

कलौ युगे कल्मषमानसानामन्यत्र धर्मे खलु नाधिकारः ॥

(इति श्रीमद् ब्रह्मसंहिता)

श्री राम नाम के दो अक्षरों का सतत प्रेमपूर्वक स्मरण करते हुए जीव मुक्ति को प्राप्त करता है। कलयुग में मलिन चित्त वालों के लिए अन्य धर्मों (सामर्थ्यहीनताके कारण) का अधिकार नहीं है।

Moreover it is also quoted in bhusundi ramayan and also in brahma vairvat puran [![


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .