Please explain in detail what Sri Krishna wants to say in the verse 18.66 of Srimad Bhagwad Gita :

१८-६६|| सर्वधर्मान्परित्यज्य मामेकं शरणं व्रज | अहं त्वा सर्वपापेभ्यो मोक्षयिष्यामि मा शुचः

  • See this page .Read the commentaries given by the various Acharyas.
    – Rickross
    Commented Nov 20, 2016 at 8:59
  • 3
    And here is a similar/related question.
    – Rickross
    Commented Nov 20, 2016 at 9:05
  • 1
    Here is another related question.
    – Pinakin
    Commented Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52
  • Visit Gita Supersite where you can find various translations and commentaries for Srimad BhagavadGita.
    – Pandya
    Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 9:15

2 Answers 2


sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ

Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.

Please refer: http://www.vedabase.com/en/bg/18/66 for full explanation by Srila Prabhupada.

  • 1
    Thank You. The are explanations of other scriptures too. Commented Nov 20, 2016 at 12:40
  • 4
    Upvoted Q&A to encourage you for asking & replying. However, you should put some relevant part of the link into the answer in block quotes with bit of your understanding. @bRO
    – iammilind
    Commented Nov 20, 2016 at 14:05
  • 1
    Post relevant part as an answer. Links may not be answers. Commented Nov 20, 2016 at 16:26
  • 3
    a 'link to' answer is not an answer. please edit your answer with the information from the link. You can cite the link as a source but you need to provide the information in your answer. Commented Nov 21, 2016 at 5:41

This verse should better be interpreted with context of other verses. The independent analysis/translation may lead to entirely different interpretation, as it was done in Indian movie "Dharam Sankat Mein". Let's see in bits & pieces.


BG 18.66 - Abandon all Dharma-s [and] take surrender [only] under "Me". "I" will liberate you from all sins. Don't repent.

Who liberates?

Here, "I" & "Me" should be interpreted as the ultimate One, rather than Krishna's personal form as discussed in this answer.
Krishna is a rare philosopher, who had represented the ultimate identity with "I". This "I" is the liberator or the liberation.

If all "sins" are forgiven, then What about good/bad Karma theory?

Now if we surrender to "I", then it simply liberates us from whatever sin we have incurred! That actually contradicts with other Vedic literature, which stresses on Karma & bearing its good/bad fruits. Doesn't it challenge common sense?
Yes, it does. But it's still true.

Assume 2 planes:

  1. First is material world, where we are present now. This world contains all existent & non-existent things; In short all expressible matters.
  2. The other plane is "I". That's beyond existent (sat) & non-existent (asat) & can't be expressed. If expressed, then it's no more "I". Refer Neti neti.

In plane-1, we have a perception of good Karma & bad Karma, which affects us. However in plane-2, these sins (bad deeds) & virtues (good deeds) are not accepted, rather they are treated as illusions.

BG 5.15 - The Omnipresent neither accepts anybody's sin nor even virtue. Knowledge remains covered by ignorance. Thus the creatures become deluded.

Why not to repent?

Krishna asks "not to repent/grieve", in the end of the verse.
We may think, provided that we are still in the material world, aren't we still under the spell of Karma? Won't good/bad Karma affect our past/present/future lives? If we have committed a sin then, shouldn't we worry about its repentance or prAyaschita.

Such repentance depends on the ignorance. Suppose, if I believe that, I have committed a sin, then I may want to do repentance. According to Gita, that's ignorance. In reality, no Karma happens by oneself. Only 3 modes of material nature (Sattva, Rajas, Tamas), makes all the Karma possible. Why should one repent (do prAyaschita), when the consciousness of oneself just resides as a witness or a consumer.

BG 3.27 - Actions are performed by [three] modes of [material] nature. [Purusha] Deluded by egoism believes as, "I am the do-er".

Relation of Dharma & 3 modes

The most tricky part. First of all, we should understand that Dharma is Not religion. A person can have no religion, but every entity has its own Dharma in material world. The "I" also has its own Dharma, which is supreme.
The closest single word meaning of Dharma is Tendency.

  • As a citizen of society, a person tends to do something, that's SAmAjik Dharma.
  • As a husband, person tends to do something, that's Pati Dharma
  • As a ruler/king, person tends to do something, that's Kshatriya Dharma
  • ...
  • All these combinations defines one's own natural tendency, which is Swadharma

The 3 modes of material nature as discussed above, are related to Dharma. BG 18.30-18.32:

  1. Sattva (Goodness): Follows Dharma & hence in proper alignment with all
  2. Rajas (Passion): Doesn't know about Dharma & hence are misplaced
  3. Tamas (Ignorance): Interprets Adharma as Dharma & hence are opposite

Everyone has these 3 modes present within them except the "I". "I" is beyond these 3 modes. So, Dharma is a strong & easy tool for SAtvika people towards liberation. But there is no specific requirement that SAtvika people will get quicker liberation/Moksha compared to RAjasika or TAmasika.
For example, ShishupAla who had spent his life in ravaging innocent people got liberation as discussed in SabhA parva. Similarly Kansa, who killed innocent infants by throwing them to a wall, also got Moksha. Both of them showed Tamas qualities. There might be back-story explanations of these 2 (e.g. Jaya-Vijaya), but this is a neutral point of view. Similar can be said about RAvana as well, who was RAjasika (a Rakshasa).

Why to abandon All Dharma-s

Arjuna was born with Daivi Sampada (Divine Quality) as he was predominantly SAtvika. As noted in Shankara's commentary, the Gita was said with respect to Arjuna representing the humanity.

Arjuna is not alified for steadfastness in Knowledge through monasticism in the primary sense. Still, the Gita being meant for mankind as a whole, monasticism is spoken of here by accepting Arjuna as a representative man.

Now, Sattva or "following of Dharma" also refrains a person from liberation. It holds a Purusha within material nature by knowledge & happiness! This is a rare caveat found in Gita and this is the primary reason for abandoning all Dharma to be able to merge with the supreme/"I".

BG 14.5,6,7,9 — O might armed, the modes of Sattva, Rajas & Tamas generated from Prakruti, binds the embodied Indivisible (Atman) into (subtle) body. — O sinless, Due to purity, the Sattva is illuminating & distortionless. It binds with happiness & with knowledge. — O son of Kunti, know that Rajas is generated from self-desire & thirst (to achieve). That binds the embodied (jeeva) with Karma. — O Bharata, know Tamas to be born from ignorance. It binds all bewildered embodied (jeeva) with enjoyment, laziness, sleep.

Though Krishna followed Dharma all his life, he never refrained from breaking stereotype whenever needed. As discussed in this answer, he didn't allow Sattva to overcome him. Rather he remained beyond 3 modes.

Still, sattva is foundation for any good society and many people follow it for smooth liberation. Treat Dharma as a boat in the river like life. Once you reach the other side of the river, where the "I" abodes, leave the boat!

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .