Is the object of Putrakāmeṣṭi only a son or a child of any gender?

For example, if a couple already have a girl child, can they still perform putrakāmeṣṭi desiring a son?

Any examples from our scriptures where a couple performed putrakāmeṣṭi seeking a son but instead a baby girl was born?

If the object of putrakāmeṣṭi is to just have a child (of any gender), is it a mere coincidence that Daśaratha in Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa had all male children and no girls?

  • 1
    I'm pretty sure the Putrakameshti Yagna is only for having sons, but let me find where the Putrameshti Yagna is mentioned in the Vedas. And it can be performed regardless of whether you already have children. Dec 23 '16 at 20:50
  • But there are ways to get a daughter, like the procedure given in verse 17 of this chapter of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad: sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe15/sbe15097.htm Dec 23 '16 at 21:04
  • @KeshavSrinivasan Yes, I too think it's mainly for sons. But looking for scriptural references that say so. Dec 23 '16 at 21:15
  • @Keshav Isn't it that Malayadhvaja obtained Devi Meenakshi through this Yagna?
    – Surya
    Jul 28 '17 at 16:47
  • King Drupada performed such a yagna to get both a son (Drishtadyumna) and a daughter (Draupadi)
    – mar
    Dec 16 '17 at 23:08

Besides the famous Putrakameshthi of Ramayan, there are other examples as well in the scriptures and every time it has resulted in the birth of sons.

Mahabharat Book 13 Anushasan Parva Section XXX mentions Rishi Bharadwaj performing a similar Yagnya for Divodas:

"Bhishma continued, 'Unto him who pleaded so piteously, Bharadwaja of great energy said, Do not fear! Do not fear! O son of Sudeva, let thy fears be dispelled. I shall perform a sacrifice, O monarch, in order that thou mayst have a son through whom thou shalt be able to smite thousands upon thousands of Vitahavya's party. After this, the Rishi performed a sacrifice with the object of bestowing a son on Divodasa. As the result thereof, unto Divodasa was born a son named Pratarddana.

(BTW Mahabharat also talks about Bharadwaj rishi beng involved in another Yagnya of this kind, the Marut-stoma where King Bharat receives a son.)

Again in the 26th Chapter of the Sahyadrikhanda of the Skanda Purana we come across the following:

enter image description here

Some may doubt that it could be the translator's bias but further verses give us direct proof:

enter image description here

In yet another example from the same book we see:

enter image description here

Again in the legend of Devi Meenakshi's birth, her king Malaydhwaj was advised by Indra to conduct a Putrakameshti for an heir:

enter image description here

This resulted in the emergence of a three-year old girl from the Yagnya Vedi but Malaydhwaj was disappointed since he was expecting a male heir:

enter image description here enter image description here

Judging by these examples I would say that the Putrakmeshthi Yagnya was conducted specifically for obtaining Putra not Putri which kind of makes sense since all these kings were looking for heirs for their kingdoms.

  • Actually the word include both genders, Putra Ca Putri Ca. For example, when King Malayadhwaja performed the Yagna for an heir, Devi Meenakshi was born as his daughter.
    – Surya
    Jul 28 '17 at 16:46
  • 1
    @Surya if I remember correctly that particular Yagnya was also done with a desire for a son and the king since the appearance of Devi Meenakshi was quite unexpected. The king apparently was even sad that he couldnt obtain a male heir from the Yagnya until a divine voice advised him to count his blessings for the daughter that he was given. Jul 28 '17 at 17:18
  • Yes that seems to make sense now that you put it that way.
    – Surya
    Jul 28 '17 at 17:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .