3

There is a popular belief that the Vedas have section like jnana kanda and karma kanda.

Is there any such statement in the Vedas which talks of such kAndams?

2

The subject matter of the whole Veda is divided into Karma- Kanda, Upasana-Kanda and Jnana-Kanda.

The Karma-Kanda or "Ritualistic Section deals with various sacrifices and rituals".

The Upasana-Kanda or "Worship-Section deals with various kinds of worship or meditation".

The Jnana-Kanda or "Knowledge-Section deals with the highest knowledge of Nirguna Brahman".

The Mantras and the Brahmanas constitute -> Karma-Kanda; the Aranyakas Upasana - Kanda; and the Upanishads Jnana-Kanda.

According to Sri Sankara, [Phala (end result or the objective)]: "Karma-kanda aspires for worldly prosperity and heavenly pleasures. The aim of Jnana-kanda, he said, is liberation (Moksha). Further, he pointed out that Brahma Sutra says (3.5.36-37) even those who do not perform rituals are qualified to gain knowledge".

Karma Kanda is the section of the Vedas that lists rituals, ceremonies and actions, which, when performed, lead one to enjoyment and power. On the other hand, Jnana Kanda, comprising the philosophical teachings of the Upanishads, deals with the liberating knowledge and disclaims action as a means of attaining liberation. It would appear that these sections are fundamentally contradictory.

  • statement in the Vedas which talks of such kAndams? Not statements of non vedic text. – Rakesh Joshi Jun 27 '17 at 2:59
0

the three categories karma, jnana and upasana kanda appears to be divisions made later on by those analysing the vedas. about the contradictions between the various ways to attain the Ultimate truth, it is not surprising as Supreme Brahman/ Ultimate Truth is infinite and hence all contradictory methods finally leads to this, when sincerely followed. There cannot be one single path to attain infinite Truth.

  • 1
    Welcome to the site! We need to give references while giving answers on this platform. It would be great if you could link your logic to some scriptural references and share them as well. – Dr. Vineet Aggarwal Jan 17 '18 at 5:14
-1

Hindu philosophy refers to a group of Shad-darshanas.

  1. Samkhya
  2. Yoga
  3. Nyaya
  4. Vaisheshika
  5. Mimamsa
  6. Vedanta

Of these six the 'Meemamsa' and 'Vedanta' philosophies contradict each other.

The aim of Mimamsa is to provide a philosophical justification for the observance of ritual. Because Mimamsa is concerned with the earlier parts of the Vedas it is also referred to as Purva-Mimamsa (“Prior Study”) or Karma-Mimamsa (“Study of Actions”) or Karmakanda.

Codana-laksano 'rtho dharmah: "Duty is that which is indicated by the injunctions of the Vedas."(Mimamsa Sutra 1.1.2)

Vedanta, which deals with the later portion of Vedic literature called the Upanishads, is called Uttara-Mimamsa (“Posterior Study”) or Jnana-Mimamsa (“Study of Knowledge”) or Jnana-kanda.

Through continuous pursuit of Satya (truthfulness), Tapas (perseverance, austerity), Samyajñāna (correct knowledge), and Brahmacharya, one attains Atman (Self, Soul). — Mundaka Upanishad, 3.1.5

So what you need to recognise is that; you cannot find distinct sections or texts with headings or titles like Karma-kanda and Jnana-kanda among the Vedas. Basically they are two philosophies that are distinct from one another and contradict each other, which are discussed through out Vedas. Since the two philosophies stand distinct from one another, they are referred to by names that distinguish them.

One, the Karma-kanda philosophy advocates the attainment of worldly riches by pleasing the gods through conducting the rituals strictly as suggested in the Vedas and the other the Jnana-kanda philosophy, advocates attaining enlightenment by seeking true knowledge.

Hope that helps resolving your query.

  • 1
    I feel this is not the answer, I am not wishing to know what the philosophers think. I already know about Vedanta. But Vedas themselves do not say such divisions. I believe that vedas should be followed as a whole. – Rakesh Joshi Jun 23 '17 at 18:50
  • You asked if the Vedas mention about the two popularly believed sections. I said no; they are just two distinct philosophies discussed in the Vedas and recognized by thinkers as two distinct philosophies. Now it is your philosophy that they should be followed as a whole. That is debatable, because how would you make two divergent paths, converge? One thought is about the external material world, the other is about the inner soul. One goes out. The other goes in. Can the two philosophies be reconciled? No. That is why I think Upanishads, the latter additions to the Vedas, are not part of Vedas. – Anil Kagi Jun 23 '17 at 19:10
  • this conversation has been moved to chat. – The Destroyer Jun 25 '17 at 9:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .