There are many versions of Vedanta available and most of them have drastic differences and contradictions.

So is Vedanta is a loosely coined term or does it have a concrete definition?

What is its relation to the philosophy?

If veda-anta is something beyond/other than the Vedas then it cannot be called as vedanta at all.

Further, there are no divisions such ad Veda-aadi, veda-madhya then how come we have something like veda-anta?

If its a part of the Vedas then these philosophies also form the part of the so called KarmakAnda.

  • 6
    The original meaning of the word Vedanta is "the end of the Vedas", i.e. the Upanishads. But the term later came to signify the Uttara Mimamsa school, a philosophical school based on the teachings of the Upanishads as expounded in Vyasa'a Brahma Sutras. Commented Jul 4, 2017 at 8:04
  • 3
    @iammilind, when people say 'end of vedas', it is in the context of 'means' and 'end', as in 'path' and 'destination', or 'methods' and 'goal'..Vedanta means 'goal' of Vedas. the goal of Vedas is to try to show Brahman. After doing all karma mentioned in Vedas and repeated birth and death, when man wants to find something higher, that's how Brahma Sutras start 'athatho brahma jignasa' - 'After all said and done, now lets know about brahman'.. based on Upanishads etc. and finally Vedas themselves give up saying they cannot show Brahman.
    – ram
    Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 0:16
  • 1
    @RakeshJoshi, have you heard 'na karmana na prajaya..' ? Karma can never lead one to moksha, only tyaga can - karma tyaga (as part of jnana yoga) and karma phala tyaga (as part of karma yoga). Vedas contain methods for all 4 purusharthas - dharma, artha, kama, moksha. the part dealing with moksha has been given a name called vedanta. i don't see any confusion here..
    – ram
    Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 1:29
  • 1
    if it doesn't mean moksha, what else do you think amruta (immortality) means ? whenever any asura does the most intense tapas and asks brahma for immortality (WITH the body), brahma says it is not possible. So, immortality without the prakruta sharira, is moksha
    – ram
    Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 18:56
  • 3
    who said a loka cannot be mukti ? that is your own conclusion. mukti means freedom from 'samsara' and karmic bonds. that's it. there is no rule that mukti cannot involve being in a loka or without a body which are imperishable. you're thinking the 'loka' of brahman is like the worlds we see. Krishna says 'in that world of mine, neither sun nor moon shines' yet it is bright
    – ram
    Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 19:13

2 Answers 2


Vedanta (or Upanishad) literally means the end of Veda or the concluding portion of Vedas. Now this can have two meanings:

1) If Veda considered a book then Vedanta it's concluding chapters. In this case, there is virtually no difference between the two. So, there is no need to mention them separately when they are mentioned together.

2) Vedanta are the supplementary texts that are appended to the ends of Veda at a later period. Even saints like Rishi Aurobindo agrees with the Upanishadic period being much later to the Vedic period.

The conclusion 2 appears to me as much more reasonable.

Now, while its virtually impossible (IMHO) to prove that Upanishads or Vedanta are also a part of Vedas (i.e they are Sruti or heard by Rishis ) but indications which point to the opposite direction are many.

Therefore the Yogis that want rewards meditate Her, Who is of the nature of Vidyâ and Who is devoid of attributes. The best Munis, the knowers of the truths of Vedanta meditate on Her as formless, immutable, stainless, omnipresent Brahmâ devoid of all Dharma. She is described in some Vedas and Upanishads as full of Light (Tejas)

The Brâhmins, versed in the Vedas and Vedantas, are objects of venerations and must be worshipped. Give, then, them always according to merits, cows, lands, gold, etc. Don’t worship any Brâhmin who is illiterate. Don’t give to illiterates more than their belliful wants.

The Devi BhAgabatam, Book 3, Chapter 1.

Now, if Vedanta=Vedas, then there remains no need to mention them separately in the same sentence. Right? But as you can see they are mentioned separately.

Even the Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad mention Vedas and Upanishads separately while mentioning them together. Following are the relevant verses from the Upanishad.

"As from a fire kindled with wet fuel various kinds of smoke issue forth, even so, my dear, the Rig—Veda, the Yajur—Veda, the Sama—Veda, the Atharvangirasa, history (itihasa), mythology (purana), the arts (vidya), the Upanishads, verses (slokas), aphorisms (sutras), elucidations (anuvyakhyanas) and explanations (vyakhyanas) are like the breath of this infinite Reality. From this Supreme Self are all these, indeed, breathed forth. (4.5.11)

Janaka, Emperor of Videha, rose from his lounge, humbly approached Yajnavalkya and said: "Salutation to you, O Yajnavalkya. Please instruct me." Yajnavalkya said: "Your Majesty, as one who wishes to go a long distance would procure a chariot or a ship, even so you have fully equipped your mind with so many secret names of Brahman. You are also honoured and wealthy; you have studied the Vedas and heard the Upanishads. But do you know where you will go when you are released from this body?"

Verses from Brihad Aranyaka Upanishad,(4.2.1) .

The Vyasa Smriti also does the same:

Then having recited the Gayatri, the twice-born ones should commence the study of the Vedas. Having studied portion of the Saman, Yajus, and Atharvan, they should commence reading the Itihasas, Puranas and Upanishads, either entirely, or in parts, if a complete perusal is not feasible. This should be done every day. (910) (Vyasa Smriti)

So, option 2 is much more reasonable. They are appended later to the Vedas by the teachers so that the students can master the terse content of Vedas easily.

They are like appendices to the Vedas but very important texts none the less.

  • You mean verse no?
    – Rickross
    Commented Jul 6, 2017 at 12:01
  • that would be nice Commented Jul 6, 2017 at 12:03
  • @RakeshJoshi I have added them.
    – Rickross
    Commented Jul 6, 2017 at 12:22

The word Anta in definition of Vedanta stands for multiple means, here Anta = End/Conclusion/Culmination

As I discussed in this answer, Vedas constitutes four parts Samhita, Brahmana, Aranyaka & Upanishads.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Upanishads are generally comes at the end of Vedas and Upanishads signifies (spiritual) conclusion i.e extract of Vedas. So, Upanishads themselves are called Vedanta.

Verse from Upanishads mention/call Vedanta:

Mundaka Upanishad 3.2

वेदान्तविज्ञानसुनिश्चितार्थाः संन्यासयोगाद् यतयः शुद्धसत्त्वाः ।
ते ब्रह्मलोकेषु परान्तकाले परामृताः परिमुच्यन्ति सर्वे ॥ ६॥

Having without doubt well ascertained the significance of the knowledge of Vedanta the seekers, their minds purified by dint of renunciation, attain the worlds of the Brahman and when their body falls, their Atman being one with the highest immortal Brahma n are absolved all round.

Shvetashvatar Upanishad:

वेदान्ते परमं गुह्यं पुराकल्पे प्रचोदितम् ।
नाप्रशान्ताय दातव्यं नापुत्रायाशिष्याय वा पुनः ॥ २२॥

VI-22: This highest mysticism, expounded in the Vedanta in a former age, should not be taught to one whose passions have not been subdued, nor to one who is not a worthy son, nor to an unworthy disciple.

Now, talking about Vedanta school of philosophy, there are six Astika schools of Philosophy associated with primary scripture (Sutra) and Rishi as follows:

Mimansa means profound thought or examination/investigation. As Keshav discussed in this, three mimansa has done on different part/aspects of Veda.

  • Samhita Kanda - Devatakanda Sutras - Kasatrisna
  • Brahmana (Karma Kanda) - Purva Mimansa (sutra) - Jaimini
  • Upanishad (Jnana Kanda) - Uttar Mimansa (Brahma Sutra) - Vyasa

Brahma Sutra (also called Vedanta Sutra) systematizes and summarizes the philosophical and spiritual ideas in the Upanishads. So, it is considered very important text to understand the preaching of Upanishads.

Vedanta school is based on three (source) scriptures called Prasthanatrayi:

  • Shruti Prasthan - Upanishads
  • Smriti Prasthan - Bhagvad Gita
  • Nyaya Prasthan - Brahma Sutra

Hence, Vedanta by definition refers to Upanishads and as a schools, refers to philosophy/doctrine based on Prasthanatrayi.

You may refer Swami Vivekananda's lecture on Vedanta.

Regarding contradiction or differences among different Vedantic philosophy, as I discussed in this answer, (in the section "Requirement of Bhashya"), it is due to very subtle nature of Brahma Sutras and difference in interpretation by different Acharyas to prove doctrine. एकं सद्विप्रा बहुधा वदन्ति (Rigveda 1.164.46).

  • There is a false translation in the mundaka verse. It says that the fruit of vedanta and sanyasa is attaining brahmaloka. i.e loka of brahmaa not brahman Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 15:28
  • It is also not clear from the previous answers if Upanishad and others constitute Vedas or not? Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 15:30
  • Where is this division of jnana, upasana, and karma kandas in vedas? as per which vedic verse? Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 15:32
  • @RakeshJoshi Not mentioned in Vedas but you can find it in the work of Acharyas.
    – Pandya
    Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 15:44
  • All those acharyas are from jnana kanda right? :) Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 15:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .