I came across a text similar to the Smṛtis or Law Books which is called the Harita Samhita.

enter image description here

He seems to be somebody of significance because his laws are repeated by Ṛṣi Markandeya in the book. The Ṛṣis also refer to him as the son of Bhṛgu:

enter image description here

This could either imply that he was a direct son of Bhṛgu Ṛṣi or someone who belonged to his lineage. But the only information I could get on him was a vague mention in the Charak Samhita:

Now Punarvasu, out of friendliness, and prompted with compassion for all creatures, bestowed the virtuous Ayurveda upon his six disciples- Agnivesa, Bhela, Jatukarna, Parasara, Harita and Ksarapani. Su1#30-31

So my question is - who exactly is this Ṛṣi Harita?

  • 3
    The only Harita that I know of is the ancient solar dynasty king who was magically changed into a Brahmana by Vishnu. His story is described in the bottom of this web page: srimatham.com/lineage.html He was the founder of a Brahmana Gotra called Harita Gotra, which is the Gotra that Ramanujacharya belonged to. (That's why Ramanujacharya was born in Sri Perubudur, because his ancestors had been serving Adi Keshava Perumal.) But people from Harita Gotra are considered adopted descendants of Angiras (a fact mentioned in numerous Puranas), not adopted descendants of Bhrigu. – Keshav Srinivasan Sep 12 '17 at 13:18
  • 2
    Harita (हारीत) was one of the 6 disciplines of Aatreya Punarvasu (आत्रेय पुनर्वसु) who was the son of Rishi Atri(अत्रि) who is the seer (द्रष्टा) of 5th Mandala of Rigveda. According to Charak Samhita (1.18-23), Bhardwaja learnt Ayurveda from Indra and from Bhardwaja, Atreya Punarvasu learnt Ayurveda. Punarvasu taught Ayurveda to six disciplines (1.30-31), Harita was one among them. – Pandya Sep 12 '17 at 13:23
  • @KeshavSrinivasan that is interesting but if he belongs to the Angiras clan then this one must be a different guy. I hope someone would be able to dig up something. – Dr. Vineet Aggarwal Sep 12 '17 at 14:42
  • 3
    I just confirmed that the two Haritas are different. Because the Harita I'm talking about was actually the son of Ambarisha; see this chapter of the Vishnu Purana: sacred-texts.com/hin/vp/vp095.htm And in the chapter you quoted, Markandeya is telling Ambarisha about an earlier figure named Harita. Perhaps Ambarisha, after hearing the Harita Samhita, decided to name his son after its author. – Keshav Srinivasan Sep 12 '17 at 16:10
  • 1
    Btw, I also came to know about Harita DharmaSutra & Harita Smriti of which author Harita may be different from the author of Harita Samhita. – Pandya Sep 12 '17 at 17:25

Yes, as per my knowledge these two are different as harit king was from solar dynasty. sage harita's reference came from mahabharat where king harita was an ancestor of ram. So mahabharat is of dwapar youg and harita king was before bhagvan ram i.e. treta yug.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .