4

Most Vaishnavas refrain from meat and stimulant foods. But is this compulsory by the scriptures? Do any of the scriptures forbid Vaishnavas to take meat and stimulant foods?

  • It's not compulsory. You can eat meat based on your Varna or work. – The Destroyer Sep 14 '17 at 4:48
  • See Ahara Niyama grantha – ram Sep 16 '17 at 18:27
5

Vaishnavism is a sampradAya (sect or doctrine). Anyone who believes in [the supremacy of] lord Vishnu or loves lord Vishnu, can become a Vaishnava. That person can belong to any of the castes from the 4 divisions: Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya or Shudra:
What are the qualities of a Vaishnava according to the scriptures?

Meat eating is altogether a different ball game. It has to do with person's nature & food habits. Hence, relating meat eating and Vaishnavism is not proper.
e.g. Krishna was a form of Vishnu, Arjuna truly loved & surrendered to Krishna, then Arjuna can be termed as Vaishnava [in theory]. Being a Kshatriya, Arjuna could have consumed meat.


According to following thread, "meat eating" itself may not be sin if done under right circumstances:
How to wash away sin after unconsciously consuming non-vegetarian food?

And according to following post, in today's time everyone has a moral responsibility to avoid "meat eating" (especially Brahmana-s):
Should a Brahmin be vegetarian?

  • 3
    Anyone who believes in the supremacy of lord Vishnu, can become a Vaishnava.---- This definition is non existent in scriptures. Its not the correct definition of Vaishnava. One who loves Vishnu (or one who's a devotee of Vishnu) is a Vaishnava. – Rickross Sep 14 '17 at 5:05
  • 3
    Vaishnavism is not a doctrine. It is a sect formed by the teachings of Pancharatra Agamas. "Anyone who believes in the supremacy of lord Vishnu, can become a Vaishnava" this definition is a perfect notion. A person who is initiated with the Vaishnava rituals is a Vaishnava. This is said by both Lord Vishnu and Shiva and the characteristic marks of a Vaishnava are also said. Check Padma Purana, Uttara Khanda. By this ritual, a devotee takes surrender (accepts him as supreme). So, don't agree when someone says this definition is non-existent in scriptures, don't take it seriously. – Sarvabhouma Sep 14 '17 at 8:20
  • 2
    @Sinister Surrendering to a Deity and that Deity being supreme among all Deities- These are not anyway the same. "Anyone who believes in the supremacy of Lord Vishnu, can become a Vaishnava." This definition is not present in any scriptures, may be present in some acharyas work – Rickross Sep 14 '17 at 9:16
  • 1
    @Sinister Yeah there are some trolls which are not meant to be taken seriously. No matter what you do they will oppose traditional system of vedantacharyas and great bhagwatas. – Yogi Sep 15 '17 at 7:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .