4

As I discuss in this question, by far the most popular school of Hindu philosophy is the Vedanta school. But there are five other Astika or orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy: Purva Mimamsa, Samkhya, Yoga, Vaisheshika, and Nyaya. My question is about the Nyaya and Vaisheshika schools. Udayana's Nyaya Kusumanjali is a 10th century Nyaya-Vaisheshika work which seeks to logically prove the existence of God. In this excerpt from the Nyaya Kusumanjali, Udayana tries to refutes the Purva Mimamsa belief that objects have Shaktis or inherent capacities to do things:

"[H]ow in images, etc., do such ceremonies become effectual as those for inviting to deity to take up residence therein, etc.? We hold therefore that we must admit such a thing as a capacity produced by the rite Pratishtha which can be destroyed by the touch of impure persons as the Chandala, etc., which renders an image a fit object of worship." ... The 'special causes' are the various kinds of merit in the person. The deities become conciliated in the ceremonies of consecration, and show it by coming to take up their residence, i.e. by the appropriation of the image and self-consciousness thereto; but by the touch of an impure person such appropriation and self-consciousness are rendered void.

For those who don't know, Prana Pratishtha is a ritual where you invoke the presence of a god into a statue. My question is, what scriptures say that the presence of a god in a statue is removed if it's touched by a Chandala?

Note that I don't want answers that comment on the nature of the caste system, untouchability, etc. I just want a specific answer on the Praha Pratishtha point.

  • 2
    @Just_Do_It Because this is a question that falls under those categories. What I meant is that I'm not looking for answers that just comment generally on the caste system and untouchability. I want an answer that specifically provides scriptural quotes regarding Prana Pratishta being removed by a Chandala's touch. – Keshav Srinivasan Oct 3 '17 at 15:44
  • 6
    @TheDestroyer Well, traditionally Chandalas aren't allowed in temples. But as usual, we're not likely to agree on this :-) – Keshav Srinivasan Oct 3 '17 at 16:30
  • 1
    @Just_Do_It A tag is a label designed to categorize your question with other, similar questions and what the question is about. If I add a Ramayana tag, it means my question is about Ramayana and not that I'm seeking answers from Ramayana. They don't indicate the aswer's source/ – Sarvabhouma Nov 10 '17 at 17:29
  • 3
    You won't get any answer most likely because God isn't affected by a person's touch be it Chandala. – Chinmay Sarupria Nov 12 '17 at 12:06
  • 1
    ChAndAla-s weren't allowed to be in social or town boundaries. That implies that they weren't allowed in temples. Isn't that reason enough to prove the point that they would not be in sync with prAna pratishtha as well? – iammilind Nov 14 '17 at 14:53
0

Yes, it's likely to be true.
Short answer: ChAndAla-s are not allowed within the city limit, let alone the temples.
Note: We are talking about god's idol here and Not god. Refer the analogy for better interpretation.

Ancient Indian culture was highly relying on vibes and aura, based on which Certain things are auspicious & inauspicious.

ChAndAla & their social role

Refer this post: What are the order & duties of the children born from intermixing/hybridisation of 4 classes?

If a Sudra unites with a [Brahmana] woman belonging to the foremost of the four orders, the son that is begotten is called a Chandala. Endued with a fierce disposition, he must live in the outskirts of cities and towns and the duty assigned to him is that of the public executioner. Such sons are always regarded as wretches of their race. These, O foremost of intelligent persons, are the offspring of intermixed orders.

From above, it's clear that ChAndAla-s are usually outcasted from soceity (if not outlawed) & mostly they are not welcomed within the town limit itself.
If temple's idol is revered by several society people then certainly when a ChAndAla touches it, it's more likely to bring those inauspicious vibes he/she carries along. The idol may loose its original auspicious aura in front of devotees [once they know].


Analogy

If one earns a degree from a reputed institute, then he/she may not want to give that certificate paper in a dirty/careless hands. The memento of that degree in form of certificate, means a lot for the achiever.
However, suppose if the certificate is lost or got dirty, even then the education earned by that person will remain intact.

A realised person (including the lord) doesn't differentiate among various subjects of society:

BG 5.18 - The learned ones look with equality on a Brahmana endowed with learning and humility, a cow, an elephant and even a dog as well as ChAndAla.

  • As I said in the comment section above, it certainly makes sense that a Chandala's touch might remove the Praha Pratishta of a statue. But the purpose of my question is to verify if it's actually true. – Keshav Srinivasan Nov 15 '17 at 6:11
  • @KeshavSrinivasan, yes it's true. Now I have explicitly specified in the answer as well. If you were looking for reference like the one you have already referred in your Qn, then it's difficult to find. Since ChAndAla-s were not welcomed within the city limits, it will simply imply that they won't be allowed near the temple idol. The "Extra points" is just further analysis, without which the answer (in my POV) still stands complete. – iammilind Nov 15 '17 at 6:24
  • 1
    Yes, I am looking for a reference along the lines of the quote I gave in my question. The thing is, that quote is just from a Nyaya-Vaisheshika work, so I want to see if this claim has a basis in Hindu scripture. – Keshav Srinivasan Nov 15 '17 at 6:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .