I've read the claims that she was a child at the time of marriage. Is that really true? What scriptures tell about the marriage age of Sita?
-
@TheDestroyer I've not found answer to my question there– user6990Nov 20, 2017 at 11:51
-
1@TheDestroyer She was 18 years old at the time of exile. But how old she was at the time of marriage?– user6990Nov 20, 2017 at 11:57
-
She was a child, and so was Rama– marNov 21, 2017 at 0:12
-
3In olden days, they would not wait until Kama entered the heart and mind wandered to many men/women with lustful thoughts like it does nowadays. The goal of early marriage was chastity (celibacy within marriage). They also would not have physical relations until they both came of age.– marNov 21, 2017 at 0:12
-
those who ask this question must also ask the corresponding question - "How old was RAMA at the time of marriage?" - Answer is Rama was 12. Proof - Vishvamitra asks Dasharath for taking Rama to protect Yagna. Dasharatha refuses saying Rama is 'oona shodasha varsha' - meaning, not even 16. it doesn't mean he was 15 and half. 16 years is the age requirement to be a 'major', to fight in battle, cos until then you're a kid. So Dasharatha is simply referencing the fact that Rama is not old enough to fight in battle, so he is pleading Vishvamitra not to take Rama to fight in battle.– marJun 12, 2022 at 10:44
3 Answers
Here is what Sita says to Ravana in aranya kanda(sita says that when Rama left ayodhya for exile,Rama was 25 years old and sita says she was or is 18 years old.
मम भर्ता महातेजा वयसा पंच विंशकः || अष्टा दश हि वर्षाणि मम जन्मनि गण्यते | (Aranya Kanda 47 Sarga 11 sloka)
"My great-resplendent husband was of twenty-five years of age at that time, and to me eighteen years are reckoned up from my birth. "
Here is what Sita says to Hanuman
समा द्वादश तत्र अहम् राघवस्य निवेशने || ५-३३-१७ भुन्जाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी | I
ततः त्रयोदशे वर्षे राज्येन इक्ष्वाकु नन्दनम् || ५-३३-१८ अभिषेचयितुम् राजा स उपाध्यायः प्रचक्रमे | I stayed in Rama's house there for twelve years, enjoying the worldly pleasures belonging to human kind and fulfilling all my desires."
ततः त्रयोदशे वर्षे राज्येन इक्ष्वाकु नन्दनम् || ५-३३-१८ अभिषेचयितुम् राजा स उपाध्यायः प्रचक्रमे | Thereafter, in the thirteenth year, King Dasaratha along with his preceptors started to perform anointment of the kingdom to Rama, a celebrity of Ikshvaku dynasty."
Now if you calculate maths then sita says to ravana she is 18 years and she also says to Hanuman she stayed in Rama s home for 12 years before exile so if this is the case then it sounds weird that Sita was 6 years old when she married Rama.
UPDATE:-
The above part engages in wrong mathematics. It committed deduction(-) instead of addition(+).
1st statement claims Sita told Ravana she married Rama at 18.
2nd statement claims Sita told Hanuman she stayed with Rama for 12 years and had to leave on 13th year.
So, Sita married at 18 and stayed with her husband Rama for 12 years post marriage and then left for Vanprastha on 13th year at the age of 31.
18+12 = 30. Sita's age on 13th year of her marriage will be 31.
There is no mention of pre marital live-in relationship of Rama and Sita in any version of Ramayana on the planet to even consider that 12 years of living with Rama (mentioned in second statement to Hanuman) is pre marriage.
UPDATE
ऊन षोडश वर्षो मे रामो राजीव लोचनः | न युद्ध योग्यताम् अस्य पश्यामि सह राक्षसैः || १-२०-२Less than sixteen years of age is my lotus-eyed Rama, and I see no warring aptitude to him with the demons. [1-20-2
In this verse King dashratha says to sage vishwamitra that he is less then 16 years not 16 which could mean around 12-13 years.
UPDATE:-
Full context is, Rama and Lakshamana left for training under Vishwamitra to kill demon Tadka at the age of 12-14. Both Rama and Lakshamana trained under Vishwamitra for years, learned marital arts and weapon usage from him, received a lot of divine weapons from Vishwamitra and only after that engaged in battle with Tadka and killed her.
After killing Tadka both the princes travelled with Vishwamitra and eventually went to Sita's kingdom.
-
4
-
2@ram As per Valmiki Ramayana 1.20.2, Lord Shri Rama's age was around 16 years when Viswamitra came Ayodhya to seek Rama's help (much before marriage). Then, how come Ram's age was 12 years at the time of marriage?????– YDSNov 21, 2017 at 4:07
-
4@KarmanyaNanda Dvadasha means 12 and Trayodasha means 13. There's no doubt in it. Nov 21, 2017 at 4:31
-
2@TheDestroyer king dasharata said to sage vishwamitra that his son(sri Rama is less then 16 years old not 16. Nov 21, 2017 at 17:29
-
5@YDS - Dasharatha says 'oona shodasha varsha' - meaning, not even 16. it doesn't mean he was 15 and half. 16 years is the age requirement to be a 'major', to fight in battle, cos until then you're a kid. So Dasharatha is simply referencing the fact that Rama is not old enough to fight in battle, so he is pleading Vishvamitra not to take Rama to fight in a battle to protect his yagna.– marNov 22, 2017 at 0:23
As per the Skanda Mahā-Purāṇa, at the time of their marriage, goddess Sītā was 6 years old, & Śrī Rāma was 15 years old.
Chapter 30, Dharmāraṇya-khaṇḍa, Book 3 - Brāhma-khaṇḍa, Skanda-purāṇa
ईश्वरस्य धनुर्भग्नं जनकस्य गृहे स्थितम् ।
रामः पंचदशे वर्षे षड्वर्षां चैव मैथिलीम् ॥ ८ ॥
उपयेमे तदा राजन्रम्यां सीतामयोनिजाम् ।
कृतकृत्यस्तदा जातः सीतां संप्राप्य राघवः ॥ ९ ॥
- to 9. The bow of Īśvara that was kept in the abode of Janaka, was broken. In his fifteenth year, O king, Rāma married the six-year old beautiful daughter of the king of Mithilā, Sītā who was not born of a womb. On getting Sītā, Rāghava became contented and happy.
English Translation by G.V. Tagare
-
1I am personally confused regarding the age of Mata Sita as 6 years and Lord Rama as 15 years. IMO I think that it describes the age of their second birth as why would they marry at such a young age.Maybe I'm wrong. Apr 19, 2022 at 15:26
-
age of second birth? Could explain what you mean by that?...... Super-Saiyan @LSSJBroly :D– ViviktaApr 20, 2022 at 2:48
-
Sorry..It must have been awkward to read that ^_^; Actually by second birth I mean birth after initiation..Like..umm..She was a Dwija. So I was talking about that. Apr 20, 2022 at 3:50
-
2Umm... No, IMO it's their original chronological age itself being talked about, which matches with the Valmiki Ramyanaa Verse 1-20-2. So, as I see it, Sita was 6 years old, and Rama 15, at the time of their marriage, which was a common practice for those days, and in accordance with scriptures @LSSJBroly :)– ViviktaApr 20, 2022 at 8:20
-
No way that Sita was that young. Child marriages are absent in the epics. Jan 20 at 6:32
In Aranya Kanda of Valmiki Ramayana, Seetha tells Ravana that she had stayed at Ayodhya for 12 years after marriage. When She had left for Vanvaas, she was 18 and Rama was 25 years of age. Does it mean she was 6 and Rama was 13 at time of marriage ? Since vedic era, Upanayana or initiation of education was considered as 2nd birth (Dwija). For Brahmins it was done at age of 8, Kshatriyas at 11 and Vaishyas at 12. They were called Dwija (twice born) after that (Apasthamba Grihya Sutra). Since both Seetha and Rama were from Kshatriya families, both of them were initiated at age of 11. So, after their 2nd birth (initiation), their new age was 6 and 13, but their biological age was 17 and 24 years respectively at time of marriage. After 12 years of married life at Ayodhya, when they left for Forest exile, their new ages were 18 and 25 but biological ages were 29 and 36 years.