I have seen in many movies, people keep their hands on a book of Bhagavad Gita and assure that they will tell the truth.
- Is Bhagvat Gita used in court?
- Why are Ramayana, Vedas, Mahabharata & other scriptures not chosen?
Hinduism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for followers of the Hindu religion and those interested in learning more about Hinduism. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
This may not be answered from scriptures. Because swearing by Gita is not mentioned in any scriptures.
Who to swear in what ways, while giving witnesses before a judge, are clearly laid down in the Manu Smriti as follows:
8.113. Let the (judge) cause a Brahmana to swear by his veracity, a Kshatriya by his chariot or the animal he rides on and by his weapons, a Vaisya by his kine, grain, and gold, and a Sudra by (imprecating on his own head the guilt) of all grievous offences (pataka).
8.114. Or the (judge) may cause the (party) to carry fire or to dive under water, or severally to touch the heads of his wives and children.
8.115. He whom the blazing fire burns not, whom the water forces not to come (quickly) up, who meets with no speedy misfortune, must be held innocent on (the strength of) his oath.
8.116. For formerly when Vatsa was accused by his younger brother, the fire, the spy of the world, burned not even a hair (of his) by reason of his veracity.
So, these are all the methods of swearing prescribed by the scriptures.
"Is Bhagvat Gita really used in the court for oath taking?"
Yes. Also, one can choose other scriptures/gods like Ramayana, Vedas, Quran, Bible, ...
According to Indian court laws, a person is free to take oath on any holy book of his/her liking. Atheists or children are free to not choose any book at all.
Oaths Act-1969, a person can either swear in the name of God or solemnly affirm to state the truth while either deposing in a court or filing an affidavit or any other application before a court. [source]
As per Law commission of India's "Indian Oaths act", Report 28, there was a proposal to make the oaths uniform.
The main purpose of the court for a victim/convict/witness -- is to be "truthful". Let it be reasoned with the God's name, as India is a religious country. (i.e. "Say the truth for the God's sake")
Many people in India believe in lord Krishna and Gita is the most famous work associated with Krishna. Hence, court expects that by remembering almighty, the person due to morality, would not lie.
Sometimes there are multiple sides of truth. Gita is not a Dharma-shAstra per se, hence it may create tricky situations for such oath taking.
Imagine if a murderer attains yoga state with Brahman, while speaking in the court. He may say that, "I am not the murderer", as per BG 3.27, 5.8, 5.9!
"'I' certainly don't do anything" is believed by knower of fundamentals (tattva gyAna) - even while seeing, hearing, touching, smelling, eating, moving, dreaming, breathing, talking, discarding, accepting, opening, closing; ...
What if the criminal wants to become a Yogi while being presented in court! He may give up all the Sankalpa (thoughts or vows), which includes the vow/oath being taken just then (BG 6.2, 6.4, 6.24)!
O PAndava, what is said as "SannyAsa", know it to be Yoga; Anyone without retiring from vows (sankalpa), doesn't become Yogi.