I've seen that many people do devotion in madhurya bhava (the emotion of lover-beloved) to male Gods e.g., Krishna, Shiva, Rama etc.

In a similar way, can a devotee have madhurya bhava towards goddesses such as Radha, Parvati, etc. or is it forbidden?

Now it is also said that tvameva sarvaṃ mama deva deva (you truly are my all, my god of gods)

How to make sense of this?

  • You might be interested in an answer to a related question here: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/11978/… May 29, 2016 at 15:43
  • 1
    Mother Parvati Mahakali Durga and her other forms can be seen with Mother Devotion only, Shiva has said Devi should only be seen as Mother. BrahmaDeva got in trouble being enticed by Mother Parvati's beauty. For Mother Radhika, I don't know.
    – user12826
    Mar 2, 2018 at 19:26
  • @user12826 Where has Shiva said that Devi should only be seen as Mother?
    – chhatra
    Mar 23, 2021 at 18:44

3 Answers 3


The purpose of devotional practices is to feel closer to one's deity or God. Closeness towards God will only increase if one thinks of God as a personal relative rather than the all powerful all knowing God. Hence, devotee saints suggest to practice devotion in the sentiments of a friend, parent, lover, etc. As the devotion towards God increases, the bhava or sentiments automatically appear or one can practice them as per his eligibility and liking:

Although devotional service is one, it becomes manifested in eleven forms of attachment: attachment to the Lord's glorious qualities, to His beauty, to worshipping Him, to remembering Him, to serving Him, to reciprocating with Him as a friend, to caring for Him as a parent, to dealing with Him as a lover, to surrendering one's whole self to Him, to being absorbed in thought of Him, and to experiencing separation from Him. This last is the supreme attachment. [NBS - 82]

Just like a person when falls in love always thinks about his/her beloved. So also a devotee who falls in love with God always remembers his deity. Hence, madhurya bhava or kanta bhava (the sentiment of a lover) is said to be the best among all types of devotion. Because, in it, a person feels more closer and attached to God. And the scripture says, irrespective of lust, love, anger or whatever, if one directs his feelings towards God then he attains Him:

Persons who constantly direct their lust, anger, fear, protective affection, feeling of oneness and friendship toward Lord Hari are sure to become absorbed in Him. [SB - 10.29.15]

However, unlike love between two persons where taints of personal desire may persist, in devotional practices love for God is clear and crystal like the rays of the Sun. There remains no personal desire but only the desire for the Lord's happiness. Madhurya bhava is the top most devotional sentiment which only a few, out of the many, practice properly. And for those few, God is truly their everything; starting with mother, father, friend, knowledge and wealth, to all other gods (twameva mata cha pita twameva....mama deva deva).

  • 5
    @Nisar haha...I know why you asked this. At sometime I had asked the same question to someone. I can't explain them here, but the answer is No. One reason is Radha Herself holds that sentiment for God. So She is not the object of devotion in that sentiment, but the One who She loves is the object of all our devotion.
    – Be Happy
    Aug 1, 2014 at 10:44
  • 3
    @Nisar madhurya bhava towards any goddess is forbidden. Only Siva/Krishna/Other Paramatma swarupa are allowed to have that bhava for their goddess. For us all goddesses are mothers. Please be cautious. Mother will punish otherwise.
    – user1195
    Feb 11, 2015 at 15:05
  • 1
    No. Hinduism is a patriarchal religion. It allowed polygamy but not polyandry. In these way you challenge male (Lord Krishna) authority. You threatened male dominance(over Radha). She is already someone property. If you claims these mean War.
    – user5414
    Apr 20, 2016 at 22:07
  • 1
    i think everybody is adding perspective as per all sects of Vaishnav(and Krishna) sects and Shaiva sects here. Perspective of various Shakt sects is still missing in the answers.
    – zaxebo1
    Mar 2, 2018 at 12:13
  • 1
    Kali, Durga, RadhaRani, Parvati, Lakshmi, Sarasvati, Sita, are so enchanting goddess in totally different ways, so much that I understand why someone would ask this. I wonder if any examples of this kind of bhakti toward Devi are there in India 🕉 Jan 9 at 15:11

TL;DR No, this is inappropriate. However, according to the Vedas, you certainly can worship a deity/devatha of your choice. It must be noted that madhurya bhava is not something one can imitate. It is something that occurs naturally towards one's ishta devata when one is in advanced stages of devotion.

Below, I am going to present what the Vaishnava perspective (that I am familiar with) is describing the position of different gods in relation to the Supreme Atma. The Supreme Atma is identified to be Narayana, for He alone is the Paramatma of all living entities including the gods and goddesses and He alone has a śarīra-śarīri relationship with all living entities. For instance, the Subala Upanishad, as well as the Bruhadaranyaka Upanishad declare

yasyātmā śarīram. "He for whom the ātmā is the body" (Madhyandina recension of Brhadaranyaka Upanishad 3.7.22).

In other words, all jivāthmas (including various gods and goddesses) form the body of Paramāthma.

This idea is supported in the Ramayana, wherein we find Lord Brahma declaring to Lord Rama that the entire cosmos consisting of all sentient and non-sentient beings is His body:

jagat sarvam śarīram the (Ramayana 6.117.26)

and he mentions that he himself, his consort Saraswati, and the other gods created by him form His body:

aham te hṛdayaṁ rāma jihvā devī saraswatī deva romāṇi gātreṣu brahmaṇā nirmitāḥ prabho (6.117.24)

And in the Vishnu Purana:

tat sarvam vai hares tanuḥ

also supporting the same idea that everything is the body of Lord Hari

Now, further references from Bhagavad Gita

pitāham asya jagato mātā dhātā pitāmahaḥ vedyaṁ (9.17)

"Know Me to be the Father, Mother, the Supporter and the Grandfather of the entire cosmos"

gatir bhartā prabhuḥ sākṣī nivāsaḥ śaraṇaṁ suhṛt (9.18)

"I am the Goal, the Maintainer, the Master, the Witness, the Resting Place, the Refuge and the Best Friend"

Acharyas and Azhwars such as Kulasekhara have also talked about the nine types of relationship between the jivatma and the Paramatma. For instance, see this.

So, it is appropriate to develop such feelings only toward Him. For, it is said by Narada to Yudhistira,

"tasmād vairānubandhena nirvaireṇa bhayena vā snehāt kāmena vā yuñjyāt kathañcin nekṣate pṛthak" (7.1.26)

Manifesting such feelings toward other gods is artificial and improper for the following reasons:

  1. The gods are eternally parts and parcels of Narayana and do not have an independent existence. For instance, we find the following statements in the Upanishads and Puranas:

"mamaivāṁśo jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ" - Bhagavad Gita 15.7

"All jivas (including gods) are His amśas."

yathā taror mūla-niṣecanena tṛpyanti tat-skandha-bhujopaśākhāḥ prāṇopahārāc ca yathendriyāṇāṁ tathaiva sarvārhaṇam acyutejyā (Bhagavatam 4.31.14)

"Just as by watering the root of a tree, one satisfies its branches, twigs and leaves, and by supplying food to the stomach one satisfies all the senses of the body, similarly, by engaging in the service of the Supreme Lord one automatically satisfies all the gods and all other living entities."

The Antaryami Brahmana (3.7.2 to 3.7.23 or so) of the Brhadarnayaka Upanishad gives many statements of the type -

“yaṁ pṛthivyām tiṣtan prithivyāntaro yaṁ pṛthivī na vedā" "yasya pṛthivī śarīram yā pṛthivīm antaro yamayati sa ta ātmā antaryāmi amrtā”

which all essentially convey the idea that He, Narayana, exists as the inner controller of all these elements such as the sun, the earth, the eye, the fire, the water, the organs, the intellect etc.

And, all worships of gods go to Him alone (but that is indirect), as stated in:

"ye 'py anya-devatā-bhaktā yajante śraddhayānvitāḥ te 'pi mām eva kaunteya yajanty avidhi-pūrvakam" - 9.23 Bhagavad Gita

  1. Because the gods do not have an independent existence, they cannot sanction anything independently.

Whatever is requested of them by a candidate worshiping them, is only sanctioned ultimately by Narayana but through their agency.

"mayaiva vihitān hi tān" - Bhagavad Gita 7.22

  1. By such worship of gods for desires, will eventually take one to the worlds of the gods.

"yānti deva-vratā devān" (Those who worship the gods go to the gods) - BG 9.25

but all such planets will get destroyed all the way until Brahma's at the time of total dissolution (maha-pralaya).

"ā-brahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino 'rjuna.." (Bhagavad Gita 8.16)

Neither the gods themselves nor their abodes are therefore permanent and an intelligent person is not after temporary things.

"tasyaiva hetoḥ prayateta kovido na labhyate yad bhramatām upary adhaḥ" (Bhagavatam 1.5.18)

  1. gods are different appointed agents of God for universal administration and each of them is in charge of a particular department. For a good wife, or good husband, or good health, or good wealth, or good knowledge, for success, etc. one worships a particular god. The Supreme Being, Sriman Narayana is like the CEO. Worship of gods is usually for some material benefit and is usually for selfish fulfilment of selfish desires.

"kāmais tais tair hṛta-jñānāḥ prapadyante 'nya-devatāḥ" -

those whose intelligence is stolen by material desires of various types surrender to other gods (instead of Me, says Krishna) - (Bhagavad Gita - 7.20)

But the fruits given by them are also temporary:

"antavat tu phalaṁ teṣāṁ tad bhavaty alpa-medhasām devān deva-yajo yānti mad-bhaktā yānti mām api" (Bhagavad Gita 7.23)

"Men of small intelligence worship the gods, and their fruits are limited and temporary. Those who worship the gods go to the worlds of the gods, but My devotees reach My supreme planet."

One might then ask why worship of various gods and goddesses is mentioned in the Vedas. Because people of this world don't always desire the highest goal of liberation. They are more interested in temporary benefits of one kind or another. This squarely summarizes "conditioned existence". Because the Vedas are broad-minded and are said to have the compassion of a million mothers (Gita Bhashyam, Ramanujacharya, 2.46 purport), they sanction such approaches as mentioned in this verse of Bhagavad Gita:

"yāvān artha udapāne sarvataḥ samplutodake tāvān sarveṣu vedeṣu brāhmaṇasya vijānataḥ (2.46)"

"For a person who knows the self, all the Vedas are only of so much use as a flooded water reservoir is for a thirsty person."

(Purport by Ramanujacharya for this verse): All that is taught in the Vedas is not suitable to be practiced by everyone. A reservoir, which is completely overflowing with water is constructed for all kinds of purposes like irrigation etc. The thirsty person will only use enough to quench his thirst and not the entire content. Likewise, an enlightened aspirant seeking liberation will only take from the Vedas that which contributes directly to Liberation, and nothing else.

So one need not aspire for other benefits or forms of worship just because they exist.

The proper feeling toward other gods is one of reverence. One must respect them and offer due regards and obeisances to them, by all means. Daksha failed to offer proper regards to Lord Shiva and offended both Lord Shiva and Sati Devi, and got himself beheaded because of his attitude.

Even toward Narayana, feelings of madhurya bhava are artificial to manifest immediately unless one has advanced by leaps and bounds in devotional service in previous lives. Souls such as Mirabai, Godadevi, etc are exceptions. One should not imitate but begin with reverential devotional service which will naturally, in course of time, if properly applied, mature according to one's application in a particular way. This is what authoritative acharyas in all sampradayas have taught.

Putting it all together,

(Stage 1) one can go to the gods to fulfill one's material desires. That is okay, and allowed according to the Vedas. But manifesting madhurya bhava toward Radha or Lakshmi or Parvati is not appropriate. Ravana had so much lust that he was not satisfied after getting any number of good looking women. He went all the way to the Goddess of Fortune. He got himself destroyed. So, it might even be better to be an atheist and not have any faith in any form of God than lust after goddesses artificially. That is extremely injurious.

(Stage 2) If one recognizes Narayana as the Supreme Overlord of everything and directly go to Him for material desires, that is better.

(Stage 3) If one goes to Him only for liberation, giving up material desires altogether that is even better.

(Stage 4) If one goes to Him desiring Him alone and relationship with Him, that is the best.

If one is still attached to a particular god, but willing to move forward toward liberation, one can pray to that god to increase their devotion to Narayana. They would feel quite fulfilled by your desire and bless you with all their hearts to move forward. Vaishnava acharyas, in particular, have disallowed their followers from the adoration of other gods and goddesses because they did not want their followers to lose track of the goal of life, namely, liberation. But they never recommended disrespect of anyone. For instance, Madhvacharya says:

Pūjyā devās tataḥ sadā: "the gods are always to be offered respect"

People in the Sampradaya of Shankaracharya even worship all gods but with the understanding that they are, indeed, worshiping the Inner Soul within of all these gods.

Now regarding your specific question of Radha, Lakshmi or Parvati, Lakshmi or Radha are compassion potencies of the Lord and are often portrayed as mediatrices between the Lord and the jiva i.e., one takes shelter of Lakshmi/Radha to attain Narayana/Krishna. The way one takes shelter is, by considering them as a mother. If you've wronged against your father, you first try to go to your mother and then through your mother, reach the father. For example, Ramanujacharya prays in the Saranagati Gadya (verse 1):

"akhila jagan mātaram asman mātaram.. saraṇam aham prapadye." - O mother of the entire universe, my own mother, I surrender to thee (to reach the Supreme Father).

An acharya is, however, to be worshiped even greater than God because he is the one who gives access to God. He reconnects everyone to God. Therefore, we still worship Sankaracharya, Ramanujacharya, Madhvacharya, etc. But such sad-acharyas are also extremely rare.

I have presented what I have learned from acharyas. In my attempt to present this picture, I hope I have not offended anyone's feelings. My due apologies.

  • This community expects a display of professional behavior and not backbiting. If you downvote the answer, don't do it simply because "you feel you don't like it". Present solid arguments based on scripture any flaws in the answer above. That will lead to two outcomes: 1) I will learn and correct myself and change my answer. 2) Whoever reads this answer in future will have a solid answer based on Vedas. Remember, we are here as a community to offer the truth about Hinduism to the world and not to envy and backbite each other.
    – rk567
    Jul 24, 2017 at 21:02
  • +1 I didn't downvote but the votes it got may be due to the translations you quoted. Some people do not have a good opinion on ISKCON & translations. From my side, your answer has some intendation problems. It was difficult for me to know which were translation of BG shlokas and what are yours. It would be better if you improve formatting. Jun 15, 2018 at 4:27
  • @Sarvabhouma, Sree Charan, I tried my best to fix the formatting, but it is taking a lot of time. I agree with your opinion about ISKCON & translations. I have moved away from their translations.
    – rk567
    Jun 16, 2018 at 17:19

The answer I believe is no. If you have come to a point of liking Radha,I'm sure you probably have read a lot about her. Any person can realize that she literally breathes krishna,(not an exaggeration). It's always about seeing the happiness of your deities. I think it's more sensible to do what pleases her,I don't want you to be scared. They are your mother's and there are so many stories of people being cursed for liking goddesses in that way. Let's leave radha for madhav shall we.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .