8

Many people claim that as per many scholarly studies and references, "purush sukta in Rigveda is an interpolation"

Can somebody provide references to such scholarly studies and references ?

  • 3
    Indologist studies, they say that because they think that language of that sukta is advanced, Hinduism doesn't accept it though. Ved vyasa arranged suktas in books of 4 Vedas, so there were late suktas which were placed in old books and early suktas in late books of atharva Veda or khillani. – Anubhav Jha Apr 12 '18 at 5:54
  • (1)i wanted references to studies about these linguistic claims too (2) Are you saying that purush sukta is khila sukta of Rigveda (defn: Khila Suktas of RigVeda are those Suktas which are associated only in Baskala Shakha of RigVeda and not in Sakala Shakha ) ? – zaxebo1 Apr 12 '18 at 6:17
  • no I'm saying that several suktas which were revealed earlier and had earlier grammar were placed in later books, and khillani books, purush sukta is not from khillani. It might have been a later revelation which was placed in earlier books by ved vyasa himself. – Anubhav Jha Apr 12 '18 at 7:44
  • I thought there was only 1 sakha of rig Veda surviving, also don't all samhitas of all sakhas of one veda have same mantras but having a little difference? – Anubhav Jha Apr 12 '18 at 7:46
  • (1) Sri Suktam of RigVeda is a Khila Sukta. (2) Shiva Sankalpa Sukta of RigVeda is also a Khila Sukta . (3) But i do not know about Purush sukta status. also see hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/17644/… – zaxebo1 Apr 12 '18 at 8:04
1

The ideas and the linguistic style of the Purusha Suktam (RV 10.90) are consistent with those of other hymns (such as, for example, Hiranyagarbha Suktam (RV 10.121) and Vishvakarma Suktam (RV 10.81-82)) found in the tenth book of Rig Veda.

For example, compare the "सहस्रशीर्षा पुरुषः सहस्राक्षः सहस्रपात्" - "The Purusha has a thousand heads, a thousand eyes and a thousand feet" (RV 10.90.1) with "विश्वतश्चक्षुरुत विश्वतोमुखो विश्वतोबाहुरुत विश्वतस्पात्" - "He has eyes all around, faces all around, arms all around and feet all around" (RV 10.81.3).

So there is no reason to believe that it was a later interpolation after the Vedic canon was closed.

As regards the controversial mention of Brahmanas coming from the mouth of the Purusha, Kshatriya from his arms, Vaishya from his thighs and Shudra from his feet, there is nothing really offensive in this. The Cosmic Being is conceived as the totality of all that exists, and so each important part of the universe is represented by a body part of Purusha. It is ridiculous to infer that Shudra is inferior because of the philosophical idea of origin from the feet. The earth also originates from the feet, and it is one of the highest deities in the Vedas. We must really control ourselves from erroneously projecting the social realities, whatever they may be, on metaphysical concepts.

For more detailed discussion on the philosophical and theological equality of all varnas, please read this article:

https://goldenreed-hiranyayavetasa.blogspot.com/2020/05/first-let-us-look-at-following-passages.html

| improve this answer | |
  • "The earth also originates from the feet, and it is one of the highest deities in the Vedas." - and yet everyone these days wears shoes to avoid catching dirt. – sv. Jun 17 at 21:50
  • 1
    @sv. Not sure what point you want to make with above comment, but it appears out of context with my answer. The mention of the varnas in Purusha Suktam is metaphysical and philosophical, and it is completely consistent with the rest of the Suktam. I can also say that the food we put into our mouth (supposedly the "highest" part of Purusha) comes from the earth, or "dirt" (supposedly the "lowest" part of Purusha). – RamAbloh Jun 18 at 5:10
0

In general the tenth mandala of Rig Veda is late. The Sanskrit has shed many Indo-European elements of Vedic Sanskrit and looks more like Paninean Sanksrit. While early mandalas are simple hymns to personifications of nature, the tenth mandala has pantheistic speculation which would develop further in Hinduisms later.

Many scholars consider Purusha Sukta an interpolation.

Sanjay Sonawani quotes Max Müller and Henry Thomas Colebrooke in his book Origins of the Vedic Religion: And Indus-Ghaggar Civilisation:

Scholars also do agree that there are certain interpolations and corruptions in Rig Veda. This only will mean that while final codification, divisions and rearrangements of the hymns and verses of the Rig Veda, some portion was freshly inserted while some was removed. We start finding tropical Seasons, animal, plant, agricultural instrument references along with flora-fauna appearing in Rig Veda only because of this. Of interpolation purushasukta is a fine example, which, beyond doubt, has been proved to be the interpolation of far later times.

Max Muller states:

There can be little doubt, for instance, that the 90th hymn of the 10th book (Purusha Sukta) is modern both in its character and in its diction. ( ... ) It mentions the three seasons in the order of the Vasanta, spring; Grishma, summer; and Sarad, autumn; it contains the only passage in the Rigveda where the four castes are enumerated. The evidence of language for the modern date of this composition is equally strong. Grishma, for instance, the name for the hot season, does not occur in any other hymn of the Rigveda; and Vasanta also does not belong to the earliest vocabulary of the Vedic poets."

Colebrooke states,

That remarkable hymn (the Purusha Sukta) is in language, metre, and style, very different from the rest of the prayers with which it is associated. It has a decidedly more modern tone, and must have been composed after the Sanskrit language had been refined, and its grammar and rhythm perfected."

T.H.P. Chentharasseri in History of the Indigenous Indians writes:

The Purushasukta upholding four varnas is a later composition added to the original Rig Veda. It is evident from the language of the Sukta as compared with the language of the rest of the Rig Veda. That it is later production, is the opinion of all scholars. In support of this argument, Dr. Ambedkar quotes Coleebrook:

That the remarkable hymn (the Purusha Sukta) is in language , metre, and style very different from the rest of the prayers with which it is associated. It has a decidedly more modern tone and must have been composed after the Sanskrit language had been refined and its grammar and rhythm perfected. The internal evidence it furnishes serves to demonstrate the important fact that the compilation of the Vedas in their present arrangement took place, after the Sanskrit tongue had advanced from the rustic and irregular dialect in which the multitude of hymns and prayers of the Veda was composed to the polished and sonorous language in which the mythological poems, sacred and profane (Puranas and Kavyas) have been written". The Purusha Sukta which is considered to be the nucleus of Rig Veda and the philosophy of Brahmanism has not been included in the beginning or in the middle portion of Rig Veda but only at the fag end. Similarly the sum total of the ideas of Mahabharata is Bhagavat Gita. It has also been included only as an appendix to Mahabharatha. These things show that these were later interpolations to fulfill the heinous aims of Brahmanism.

The Purusha Sukta occurs also in the Atharva Veda as the supplementary part. If it was the earliest composition why should it have been placed in such an inconsequential collection. It means that it was only a later interpolation in Veda with crooked intentions. The Purusha Sukta is a forgery by the Brahmins to bolster up their claim to superiority. Dr. Ambedkar is of opinion that the Brahmins had forged the Purusha Sukta at least the two verses 11 and 12 at some later stage, a long time after the fourth varna had come into being with a view to giving the system of Chathurvarnya, the sanction of the Veda.

G. N. S. Raghavan in Discovering the Rigveda discusses verses 11 and 12:

Purusha Sukta An Interpolation

In order to confer legitimacy on the caste system with its hereditary and graded inequality, the high priests of Brahminism who acted as thought moulders interpolated hymn no. 90, known as the Purusha Sukta, in the last mandala (Book X) of the Rigveda. This poem proclaims that the scheme of Chatur Varna (Four Orders of Society) originated from the immolation of a primal being in the sacrificial fire. Verses 11 and 12 of the hymn, which has a total of 16 verses, are in the form of question-and-answer. The rest of the poem is narrative. They read as follows:

  1. When they divided Purusha how many portions did they make? What do they call his mouth, What do they call his thighs and feet?

  2. The Brahmin was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rajanya made. His thighs became the Vaisya, from his feet the Sudra was produced.

If we retain the leading question in verse 11 but omit the Brahminist answer in verse 12, the poem will be like many another Rigvedic hymn expressing wonder at the mystery of the universe and attempting an imaginative, metaphorical explanation of its origin.

Verse 13 and 14 read:

  1. The moon was born from his mind, The sun arose from the eye, Indra and Agni from the mouth, wind arose from his vital breath.

  2. The mid-region came from his navel, The sky came from his head, The earth from his two feet, The quarters from the ear —

Thus they set the worlds in order.

This is an unexceptionable hazarding of a poetic guess. The mischief is in verse 12. The significance of the anatomical detail is explained in a Brahmana passage of the Yajurveda: "The part of man above the navel is pure; that below is impure" (Sahitya Akademi's Anthology, Vol. I, p. 147). It sets out the Chatur Varna scheme which forms the bedrock of the Brahminical social system. The four orders or major castes proliferated over time into hundreds of regional castes and sub-castes in a complex system of graded inequality.

The doctrine that high and low occupations are fixed by the caste of one's birth is wholly alien to the ethos of the Rigveda. It was not to be expected that Indian Vedic scholars would be troubled by this inconsistency, steeped as they have been in the belief that the Veda is of divine origin, the rishis having merely put into verse what was 'revealed' to them.

| improve this answer | |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .