Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 6.4.7:

If she does not willingly yield her body to him, he should buy her with presents. If she is still unyielding, he should strike her with a stick or with his hand and overcome her, repeating the following mantra: "With power and glory I take away your glory." Thus she becomes discredited.

How are the above rites moral? How can you beat wife if they do not agree to have progeny? Is there some text which says that wife has duty for husband for progeny?

For those looking for these slokas mentioned they appear in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, Khila-kanda, Putramantha Brahmana. Some may write this as chapter 6 section 4, sloka 6, 7 & 8. This section outlines the putramantha rite.

Is this shruti or smriti? The rite doesn't seem Vedic.

Related: Why Garuda Purana and Brihadaranyaka Upanishad ask to beat women?


I think you have misunderstood the verses in question and have taken them out of context. It is important to read the first verse of this section 4 and the commentary. The Brhadaranyaka Upanishad with the Commentary of Sankaracarya reads (Swami Madhavananda translator):

VI.iv.1 The earth is the essence of all these beings, water the essence of the earth, herbs of water, flowers of herbs, fruits of flowers, man of fruits, and the seed of man.

The present section is introduced to lay down the method by which to obtain the kind of son who, by the manner of his birth and conception and by his good qualities, will help to achieve the worlds both for himself and for his father. Only a person who knows the meditation on the vital force and has performed the ceremony of the Mantha leading to prosperity, is entitled to this ceremony of the Mantha leading to the birth of a son. When a man wants to perform this ceremony, he should, after performing the former ceremony, wait for the right time of his wife....

and the commentary at the end of the 6th verse says "...therefore he should approach this handsome woman [his wife] and speak to her, when she has taken a bath after three nights."

and the 7th verse says:

  1. If she is not willing, he should buy her over; and if she is still unyielding, he should strike her with a stick or with the hand and proceed, uttering the following Mantra, 'I take away your reputation,' etc. She is then actually discredited.

...'I take away your reputation,'etc. As a result of that curse, she comes to be known as barren and unfortunate, and is then actually discredited

  1. If she is willing, he should proceed, uttering the following Mantra: 'I transmit reputation into you,' and they both become reputed.

First, it is sruti. Second, it does not condone wife beating. It says any hitting [and the strikes can be ceremonial, not literally] are only done after several prerequisites. First, they are married. Second, the husband knows the meditation on the vital force [not easy or accomplished by many]. Third, he has performed the Mantha ceremony. Fourth, she has bathed for three nights. Fifth, if after the husband has gone through all these prerequisites and being his wife she is unyielding, he should win her over with gifts. Not yielding, the strikes essentially are a form of renouncing the wife. The purpose of marriage is progeny. If a man has purified himself through all the steps mentioned above to have worthy progeny, and the wife is unwilling to help in the purpose of marriage, she should be renounced.

| improve this answer | |
  • "the strikes can be ceremonial, not literal" -- are these your own words/interpretation or the commentator's/translator's? – sv. Jun 8 '18 at 21:26
  • "the strikes essentially are a form of renouncing the wife" - Is this again your own interpretation or the commentator's/translator's? – SMJoe Jul 13 '18 at 13:32

The last sections of this chapter six - Brahmana 3-4 - of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad are describing a procedure for householders called Manthan" Karma for getting good wealth and good progeny.

As described by Adi- Shankaracharya in his commentary of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad this Mantha Karma is smarta procedure.

Objection: How can a ceremony that is enjoined by the Śruti be one in accordance with the Smṛti?

Reply: The Śruti here is merely repeating the Smṛti. Were it a Vedic ceremony, it would be related to the Jyotiṣṭoma sacrifice as a part is to a whole, and as such must conform to all the characteristics of the main sacrifice. But it is not a Vedic ceremony. For this reason it is also to be performed in the Āvasathya (household) fire1; and the entire procedure is to be in accordance with the Smṛti. So the vow in question is that of living on milk.

Since the ceremony is in accordance with the Smṛti, the manner referred to is that of the ‘Sthālīpāka.’[4]

We can also see this well described in another version of Brihadaranyaka Upanishad . See section 6.4.

This passage is a part of the Khila Kanda (supplementary portion) of the Upanishad and does not form the text proper, being a later addition. This opinion is held unanimously by Hindu scholars (refer to Shankaracharya’s commentary). This last chapter should not be considered as forming a part of the main body of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Further to the above, the last sections of this chapter six are the subject matter of Smriti. This Smriti explains the way of material prosperity (vital force), for the householder. The Sruti transcends this more mundane purpose of the Smriti. The Sruti that is the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad is the highest knowledge which leads to liberation from worldly desire and the creation cycle. Therefore, we conclude, the inclusion of the Smriti text is not for the purpose of instruction but for the purpose of further contemplation on the way of a vital force as the way of rebirth.

Conclusion - So these passages are basically smiriti passages which are contemplation of Shruties and is to be considered subject matter of Smriti based on scholarly views.

| improve this answer | |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .