In the Shiva purana it is mentioned that Sati went to see Rama. Is this a form of time travelling to the future as Rama did not exist when Sati was alive?

  • How u concluded that "Rama did not exist when Sati was alive"??? – YDS May 27 '18 at 14:20
  • @YDS, the question is valid as the timelines of Ramayana and Shiv family are a little confusing. I remember that the similar confusion had come in one of the other question/answer's comment. In Shiva Purana, it was mentioned that Devi Sati went to test Lord Ram by impersonating Devi Sita. And i think there is mention of Kartikeya in Ramayana so there is a conflict in the timelines. – Aby May 27 '18 at 16:48
  • 1
    @Wikash, I don't think its about time travel but seems some kind of interpolation in Ramayana/Shiva Purana. – Aby May 27 '18 at 17:29
  • @Aby still it's mystery and one can't conclude that Rama did not exist when Sati was alive.. – YDS May 28 '18 at 14:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .