I have heard from my friend that Kshatriya man can marry Vaishya woman. Is it true? What do our scriptures say on this?

  • Did you read what is suggested before accepting the edit?
    – user6981
    Oct 15, 2018 at 16:16
  • No, Vaishya man can marry girls of higher-same castes like Vaishya, Brahmin, Kshatriya, similarly Kshatriya man can marry Kshatriya or Brahmin woman only.(Sood caste is from Kshatriya father and Brahmin mother). Brahmin can marry only a Brahmin Girl. For eg. Lunar King Yayati married Brahmin Girl Devayani(daught of Shukracharya) . Detailed information is in Garuda Purana and other books of Dharma
    – user10298
    Oct 15, 2018 at 16:32
  • 2
    @Ravi, you have it completely opposite. higher-caste man can marry lower-caste women, not the other way around. the exception you mentioned is a very rare one, that was ratified by tapo-balam of Shukracharya, because Yayati originally refused/hesitated to marry because it was pratiloma vivaha (kshatriya man with brahmana woman)
    – ram
    Oct 15, 2018 at 17:21
  • oh, gktoday.in/gk/types-of-marriages-in-later-vedic-ages
    – user10298
    Oct 15, 2018 at 18:06
  • Its kind of strange because whole Yaduvansh, Yadavas including Lord Krishna etc., are in lineage of a King Yadu, son from a Pratiloma Vivah between Yayati and Devayani, while Kurus/Purus were from Anulom lineage of Yayati and Sharmishta.
    – user10298
    Oct 15, 2018 at 18:18

4 Answers 4


Manu Smriti 3.12. For the first marriage of twice-born men (wives) of equal caste are recommended; but for those who through desire proceed (to marry again) the following females, (chosen) according to the (direct) order (of the castes), are most approved.

Manu Smriti 3.13. It is declared that a Sudra woman alone (can be) the wife of a Sudra, she and one of his own caste (the wives) of a Vaisya, those two and one of his own caste (the wives) of a Kshatriya, those three and one of his own caste (the wives) of a Brahmana.

As per the scriptures, a Kshatriya is allowed to marry more than once. So, for the 1st marriage it is recommended that his wife also belongs to the same caste/Varna.

If he wants to marry again, then he can take wives from the Vaishya caste.

Similar verses are found in other Smritis as well.

For example Vyasa Smriti 2.10-11 state:

(A twice born) one can take a wife who is not of his own caste (Varna), even after marrying, one of his own order (Varna). The son begotten on the wife of one's own caste, does not stand as an Asavarna (of a different caste) son to one under the circumstance. (10)

A Brahmana can marry a Kshatriya or Vaishya girl; a Kshatriya can take a Vaishya wife, and a Vaishya can wed a S'udra's daughter. But the member of an inferior caste can not wed a girl of superior caste. (11)

Therefore, it is allowed (but not that much recommended).

  • So, can a Brahmana man marry a woman belongs to Shudra caste and beget a child from her after marrying each woman from the above three castes? Jul 9, 2018 at 4:26
  • 1
    Yes he can but the first wife, who accompanies him in rituals, should be a Brahmani only. @NarayanaSharma
    – Rickross
    Jul 9, 2018 at 5:13
  • So, If a brahmin begets a child from Shudra woman without marrying and begetting children from woman of the above three castes, he looses his Brahmana rank. Jul 9, 2018 at 5:16
  • 1
    Yes he falls from his caste. Gods and Manes will abandon him. It is so said in Smritis. @NarayanaSharma
    – Rickross
    Jul 9, 2018 at 5:18

This is what the chapter 113 of Markandeya Purana says in this regard

  • A brahman who marries wives among all the castes, provided that he marries first a brahman woman, incurs no injury in his brahman-hood.

  • Likewise a kshatriya who marries first a kshatriya’s daughter, incurs no harm if he marries wives from lower castes.

  • Thus a vaisya, who marries first a vaisya woman and afterwards a girl born from a sudra family, is not excluded from the vaisya family.

The law is thus declared in order. Brahmans, kshatriya, vaisyas, who do not first marry women of the same caste, fall by marrying women of other castes, O king. Whatever excluded woman a man marries after neglecting union in his own caste, of that woman's caste let him indeed become a participator. ~English translation source

Prince Nabhag (son of King Dishta) married a girl from vaisya family without first marrying within his own kshatriya varna. Thus he was declared a vaisya. (this is explained in the above mentioned same chapter)


"If, then, with all the documents before us, we ask the question, does caste, as we find it in Manu and at the present day, form part of the most ancient religious teaching of the Vedas?, we can answer with a decided 'No'. There is no authority whatever in the hymns of the Veda for the complicated system of castes; no authority for the offensive privileges claimed by the Brahmans; no authority for the degraded positions of the Sudras. There is no law to prohibit the different classes of the people from living together, from eating and drinking together; no law to prohibit the marriage of people belonging to different castes; no law to brand the offspring of such marriages with an indelible stigma."

Max Müller in "Chips from a German Workshop", Vol. II, pp. 305 - 306

  • 2
    Is it a valid reference ?
    – TheLittleNaruto
    Jul 21, 2018 at 16:18
  • 2
    @TheLittleNaruto He was an expert on the Vedas.
    – Vyper
    Aug 18, 2018 at 3:35
  • 1
    Never knew that
    – TheLittleNaruto
    Aug 18, 2018 at 6:14
  • 2
    Max Mueller wasn't an expert. He was hired by the British to destroy our scriptures.
    – user9969
    Oct 15, 2018 at 17:52
  • 1
    @SuryaKantaBoseChowdhury Yes, in his early years, he was pro-Christian and Eurocentric. However, in his later years, after the late 1860s, he became more pro-Vedic and praised the Vedas and Hinduism. When he became pro-Vedic/pro-Hinduism, there was retaliation against him by the Church and by his Christian Eurocentric colleagues at Oxford. Because of this, he lost the vote for the Boden Professor of Sanskrit at the University of Oxford.
    – Vyper
    Oct 15, 2018 at 22:05

Yes. Kshatriya man 'can' marry a Vaishya woman, without his children losing their Varna. Means, their child will continue to be a Kshatriya.

A Kshatriya may take three wives. In two of them (viz., the one taken from his own order and the other that is taken from the order immediately below), he takes birth himself (so that those children are invested with the status of his own order). His third wife being of the Sudra order is regarded as very inferior. The son that he begets upon her comes to be called as an Ugra. [source]

There is no restrictions of number of wives for a man, if married appropriately. So the term "three wives" does not mean 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 wives. It means, Kshatriya 'can' have wives from the 3 primary classes of society except Brahmana.

Note: The identity (not to confuse with the Varna / class) of such child born from Kshatriya man & Vaishya woman is called: "Karna".
Famous examples from Mahabharata are Radheya/Vasusena (famously called Karna) and Yuyutsu (Dhritarashtra's son from a Vaishya woman). Refer this answer.

  • 2
    Again, Karna was a Kshatriya. Kunti was a Kshatriya. Vasudeva and Nandagopa were not brothers. Jul 18, 2018 at 5:31
  • 1
    I don't know how you got the doubt regarding Kunti..If Kunti was from Vaisya Varna how come you consider Arjuna, Bhima as Kshatriya??
    – YDS
    Jul 20, 2018 at 5:22
  • @YDS, Kunti was adopted by a Kshatriya king. However, her birth-wise class 'might' be Vaishya. Now this is just a theory, as discussed in the linked answer. We are open to believe/disbelieve it. However, in both the cases (i.e. Kunti as Kshatriya or Vaishya), PAndava-s would be considered Kshatriya, as their adoptive father king PAndu was a Kshatriya.
    – iammilind
    Jul 20, 2018 at 8:21
  • @iammilind then Dhritarashtra was also Kshatriya..how come Yuyutsu became of some other Varna?? 🤔🤔... anyway u r not open to disbelieve it...else after discussing so many times.. till now u might hv considered Kunti as Kashtriya...
    – YDS
    Jul 20, 2018 at 13:17
  • @YDS, Yuyutsu was Kshatriya, with identity as "Karna". Refer the linked scripture. I consider Kunti as Kshatriya by nature. Just that my assumption is that her birth based Varna could be Vaishya. This might be a wrong guess as well. But haven't found any solid scripture proof so far.
    – iammilind
    Jul 20, 2018 at 14:19

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .