It is not possible to answer this question since it is not possible to describe Nirguna Brahman.
- Moreover, the Vedas reveal this; likewise this is mentioned in the Smritis also.
Moreover, the Vedas reveal through a negation of other aspects that
Brahman has no distinguishing feature, as for instance in, “Now
therefore the description (of Brahman): ‘Not this, not this’”
(Brhadaranyaka Upanishad II.iii.6), “That (Brahman) is surely
different from the known; and, again, It is above the unknown” (Kena
Upanishad I.4), “That Bliss of Brahman, failing to reach which, words
turn back along with the mind” (Taittiriya Upanishad II.ix.1), and so
on. And it is also known from the Vedic texts that Badhva being
asked by Baskali, replied merely by not uttering a word, as stated in,
“He (Baskali) said, ‘Teach me Brahman, sir.’ He (Badhva) became
silent. When the question was repeated a second and a third time he
said, ‘I have already spoken, but you cannot comprehend. That Self is
Quiescence’ “. Similarly in the Smritis, the instruction is given
through a negation of other things, as in, “I shall tell you of that
which is to be known and by knowing which one attains immortality. The
supreme Brahman is without any beginning. It can neither be called
gross (visible) nor fine (invisible)” (Gita XIII.12), and so on.
Similarly the Smriti mentions how Narayana in His cosmic form said to Narada, “O Narada, that you see me as possessed of all the (five
divine) qualities of all elements, is only because of My Maya, called
up by Myself. For else you should not understand Me thus.”
Brahma Sutra Bhasya of Sri Sankaracharya III.ii.17