6

Do Shaivas accept that Rama and Krishna were incarnations of Vishnu?

How do Shaivas view and interpret these Itihasas?

  • 1
    They don't interpret Itihasas, Ramayana and Mahabharata, because those scriptures are not of their interest. Shaiva scriptures are of their interest. – brahma jijnasa Oct 9 '18 at 22:56
  • 1
    By the way, it is a common misconception among some Hindus that Shaiva Puranas such as Shiva Purana represent a scripture of interest to traditional Shaivas. As far as I heard Shiva Purana and other Puranas were not of interest to old Shaiva traditions, and they became of interest only in recent time, perhaps in a past couple of centuries or so. – brahma jijnasa Oct 9 '18 at 23:18
  • like Vaishnavas interpret Shiva Mahapurana – user10298 Oct 14 '18 at 18:19
7

As per Shiva Purana: PART TWO RUDRA SAMHITA: SATI KHAND: Chapter 24,

[Lord Shiva said to Sati:]

  1. The fair-complexioned one is younger brother Laxman, the incarnation of Shesha. The elder brother is complete incarnation of Vishnu. He is called Rama.

So, you can see that Shiva Purana (important scripture for Shaivas) portraits Rama as an incarnation of Vishnu.

Also, as mentioned in this post, Ramcharitmanas itself is a narration of Parvati's Qs and Shiva's answers only. And, at many places, Ramcharitmanas portraits Rama as Vishnu's incarnation.

  • Shiva said "he was his deity". Means earlier he was but not now? – Rishabh Oct 9 '18 at 6:18
  • 1
    @Rishabh This is due to the use of Reported speech as tense changes when reported-speech is used.... – YDS Oct 9 '18 at 8:45
  • @Rishabh Anyway I hv removed irrelevant and debate inviting part ;) – YDS Oct 9 '18 at 9:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .