4

According to this Gaudiya Vaishnava site, Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu brought the tradition of Durga Puja in Odisha:

It is a misconception among many Gaudiya Vaishnavas that worship of Lord Shiva or Devi Durga is prohibited and offensive and not as per our Guru varga teachings . What is actually condemned is the “independent” worship of Lord Shiva and Devi thinking of them as the Supreme Divinity and asking only for material pleasures.

If one worships them with devotion and respect as an expansion of Lord’s energy along with Lord Himself then there is no harm. Lord Shiva and Devi are famous for granting the required strength and clear all hurdles in the spiritual path of devotees. They will grant whatever is needed by devotees to attain Sri Radha Krishna’s service. As a matter of fact, it is Sriman Chaitanya Mahaprabhu who started the Saradiya Durga Pooja mahotsava in Orissa 500 years ago. This is acknowledged by Orissa government as well...

My questions are:

  1. Do any of the biographies of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu mentioned Him to have founded the Durga Puja tradition in Odisha?

  2. Has Srila Prabhupada or any other ISKCON acharyas commented on this issue?

  • 3
    "It is a misconception among many Gaudiya Vaishnavas that worship of Lord Shiva or Devi Durga is prohibited and offensive and not as per our Guru varga teachings . What is actually condemned is the “independent” worship of Lord Shiva and Devi thinking of them as the Supreme Divinity " This is really eye-opener . This is one of the interesting questions , although i know very little about the topic. – SwiftPushkar Oct 22 '18 at 5:15
  • @SwiftPushkar Did you check out the site I quoted from? – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury Oct 22 '18 at 7:00
  • 1
    Yes OK , So Gaudiya Vaishnavas do not completely reject idea of other sects but consider other gods as expansions of vasudeva and not as independent supreme entities. – SwiftPushkar Oct 22 '18 at 7:10
  • 1
    @SwiftPushkar When Dayanand Saraswati condemned Kali worship of Bengal heavily, BhaktiVinod Thakur actually wrote an article in harmonist supporting the worship of Kali. The reason is that Gaudiya Vaishnavas recognize Kali worship as part of whole Vedic system and by depriving this, some may leave dharma altogether, though it is not considered the highest conclusions of scriptures. I am searching for that article. About Chaitanya starting Durga puja, Idk. You may read this: nitaaiveda.com/Compiled_and_Imp_Scriptures/… – user16618 Jan 7 at 12:58
  • 1
    @RaRe Thanks for sharing that article. It's beautiful. – Surya Kanta Bose Chowdhury Jan 7 at 14:52
3

I never found this in any authentic biographies of Mahaprabhu. So it seems to be a belief alone. But your quotation comes from one Gaudiya Vaishnava site. Its good to see that these Gaudiya Vaishnavas dont brand Durga as demi-god as other do. And Mahaprabhu's starting of Durga puja at Puri does not seem impossible at all because of the following facts:

  1. Sri Chaitanyadeva was worshipped by His devotees as Durga as described in one of His most authentic biographies named Sri Chaitanyabhagavata written by Srila Vrindabandasa. Their She has been referred to as the Adyashakti, the Yogamaya.

  2. Sri Chaitanya has copied Sri Sri Saptashati Chandi Himself. So He respected Durga. Sri Sri Chandi is a very respected book in Bengal.In Chandi, Devi is the Supreme Godhead. So Sri Chaitanyadeva knew very well that Sri Krishna and Sri Durga are one and the same. In fact the adishsthatri devata of all Vishnu mantras is Durga. The Naradapancharatra also says the same thing which is also quoted by Srila Srijiva.

  3. Sri Shrijiva Goswami, the nephew of Sri Rupa and Sri Sanatana Goswami and one topmost saint of the Gaudiya Vaishnava sect quotes a sloka from the Gautamiya Kalpa : Krishna is Durga and Durga is Krishna. One who sees them as two can not be get liberation from the worldliness.

  4. Sri Nityanandadeva, the companion of Sri Chaitanyadeva, always kept on his head bound by His matted hair one Vaneswar Shivalinga and one Shree yantra and worshipped them regularly. These two are still worshipped at the Khardaha Shyamasaundara temple established by His son. His heirs all worship Durga till today.

  5. Brajagopikas worshipped Devi Katyayani to get Sri Krishna as their husband. Katyayani is a name of Durga. This is mentioned clearly in Srimadbhagavatam--a book that the Gaudiya Vaishnavas respect the most.

  6. In the Mahabharata, Sri Krishna orders Arjuna to pray to Durga before the beginning of the Kurukshetra war. In Arjuna's hymn, Durga is called 'Mahishasrikpriya' (Mahabharat, Bhisma parva, 23/2) ie who loves the blood of Mahisasura.So its the same Durga whom bengalis worship.Mahaprabhu must be knowing this.

  7. Arjuna also calls Her "Swadha" in that hymn. On the otherhand, in Gita Sri Krishna says that He is "Swadha Himself.(Gita,9/16).These can not be unknown to Mahaprabhu.

  8. Arjuna calls Her "Janani" (Universal Mother)in that hymn.In Gita, Sri Krishna says, He is the Universal Mother (Gita,9/17).So the very Mahabharat says Sri Durga is one with Sri Krishna.

  9. Durgapuja with Lakshmi,Saraswati,Kartika and Ganesha started in Bengal. I think only someone of Mahaprabhu's stature could start that puja in the pure bengali way on the very premises of the Jagannath temple.

(Reference: 1. Gaur Katha- Dr. Mahanambrata Brahmachari, vol 3 2. Introduction of Chandichinta by Dr. Mahanambrata Brahmachari. 3.Sri Chaitanyadev by Swami Saradeshananda, Udbodhan Karyalaya. 4. Tika of Brahmasamhita 3 by Srila Srijiva Goswami)

  • 3
    Hi. Question is not about views of Gaudiyas Vaishnavas or Chaitanya Mahaprabhu on Shiva and Durga, Question is whether Chaitanya founded Durga Puja tradition in Bengal. Except first line, rest of the answer is irrelevant to question. – The Destroyer Jan 18 at 7:27
  • 2
    I've edited the answer to avoid irrelevant information. Answer to-that-point on topic what has asked in question. Consider to cite some sources. Also note that "But, the Gaudiya Vaishnavas have been trying to demean Shiva and Shakti for last hundred years, mentioning them as demigods." blaming particular sect is not encouraged here. – Pandya Jan 18 at 7:32
  • @Pandya seems like the changes you did have been rolled back without explanation. – Ambi Jan 18 at 8:18
  • 2
    @ParthaBanerjee Irrelevant in the sense, they are not relevant to question. Mods don't care about factual or technical details of answers or posts. Except first line, rest of the answer is not relevant to question. – The Destroyer Jan 18 at 8:19
  • Let us continue this discussion in chat. – user16618 Jan 18 at 9:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .