This confusion came into my mind after watching Ekta Kapoor's 'Kahani Mahabharat Ki..' TV serial.

I saw this story that Rishi Vyasa was the biological father of Dhitarashtra and Pandu, or something like that. Is this true? What is the story behind the birth of Dhritarashtra and Pandu? Or was it Vidura who was the son of Vyasa?

  • and they were not "biological" sons, but rather were the result of mantras, what you call assisted reproduction now a days, just too advanced.
    – Dr Tiwari
    Sep 30 '14 at 10:52

The Kauravas are biological descendants of Vyasa, but the Pandavas are not, as I'll explain below. But first, some background.

Shantanu, king of Hastinapura many generations before the Pandavas and Kauravas, married the goddess Ganga and had a son named Bhishma. But then Ganga abandoned Shantanu, and Shantanu later fell in love with a woman Satyavati. But Satyavati's (adopted) father Matsyagandha, the chief of a fisherman tribe, wouldn't consent to the marriage, because he was afraid that Bhishma and his descendants would rule Hastinapura rather than Satyavati's children. So Bhishma made a vow that he would never become king, and that he would remain celibate so that his descendants could never claim the throne. (It's because of that terrible vow that he got the name "Bhishma" or terrible.) Then Matsyagandha agreed to the marriage, and in due course of time, Shantanu and Satyavati had two sons, Vichitravirya and Chitrangadaa. When Shantanu died Chitrangada became king, but he soon died after a confrontation with a Gandharva because the two of them had the same name (yes, really!).

When Vichitravirya became of marriageable age, Bhishma heard that the king of Kashi was holding a Swayamvara for his daughters Amba, Ambika, and Ambalika. So Bhishma went to the Swayamvara kidnapped the three princesses. As I discuss in my answer here, he released the eldest princess Amba, a decision that would later have devastating consequences. In any case, Vichitravirya married Ambika and Ambalika, but almost immediately thereafter he died of a disease. So now the kingdom faced an uncertain future, because Vichitravirya and Chitrangadu was dead, and Bhishma could not have children, which meant there was no prospect of heirs to the throne. So Shantanu's widow Satyavati sent for the sage Vyasa, a son she had with the sage Parashara before she met Shantanu, and told him to father sons with the two queens.

Now Vyasa, being an ascetic, didn't pay much attention to his appearance, so the queens were quite hesitant to have children with him. As described in the Adi Parva of the Mahabharata, Ambika closed her eyes the whole time, so Vyasa got angry and put a curse on her that she would have a blind son, Dhritharashtra. And Ambalika was pale the whole time, so Vyasa put a curse on her that her son Pandu would have leprosy. On the other hand, Ambika's maidservant was eager to have a child with such an illustrious sage, so Vyasa fathered a child with her as well, Vidura.

So yes, this does mean that biologically the Kauravas were the grandchildren of Vyasa, since they were the sons of Dhritarashtra and Gandhari. But that doesn't mean that the Pandavas are the grandsons of Vyasa as well. You see, although the Pandavas were the sons of Kunti and Madri, the two wives of Pandu, they are not in fact Pandu's biological children. Pandu had incurred a curse that he could not touch any woman with desire. So Kunti used a special mantra she had acquired from the sage Durvasa which allowed you to have children with any god. So Kunti used the mantra to have three sons - Yudhishtra from Yama the god of death, Arjuna from Indra, and Bhima from Vayu the wind god. And she taught the mantra to Madri who used it to have two sons, Nakula and Sahadeva, with the two Ashwini Kumaras.

So to sum up, the Kauravas had the blood of Vyasa, and thus some small amount of blood from Shantanu's wife Satyavati, albeit not the blood of Shantanu himself. The Pandavas, on the other hand, didn't even have the blood of Vyasa, being the sons of gods. Ironically, the only living person at the time of the Mahabharata war who had blood from the actual royal family of Hastinapura was Bhishma, the one person who couldn't be king or have children. So in the strictest sense the bloodline of Shantanu ended with the death of Bhishma at the end of the Mahabharata war.

  • Is this true that after the death of Vichitravirya, his mother Satyawati wanted her daughter in laws (Ambalika and Ambika) to have children from Bhishma? She insisted Bhisma to be father of their children, sent them to Bhisma's place, but it was Vyasa to whom they found there. Is this true? Sep 10 '14 at 9:10
  • 2
    @sandeep.ganage Yes, Satyavati did initially request Bhishma to father children with Ambika and Ambalika, which he refused to do so: sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01104.htm But Bhishma didn't trick Satyavati, he explicitly suggested that she call a great Brahmana to father children with the two queens, and then Satyavati is the one that thought of her son Vyasa: sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01106.htm So this was all with Satyavati's full knowledge. Sep 10 '14 at 9:19
  • (As I heard) 1. Satyavati asks Bhishma to marry Ambika and Ambalika - which Bhishma refuses as he vowed to be unmarried. 2. Ambika's Maid servant comes to serve Vyasa and Vyasa thinks she is the 3rd Daughter in Law of Satyavati and has to be impregnated. 3. Drutharastra's Blindness is not a Curse, but Virtue.
    – Narendra N
    Sep 6 '16 at 7:28

I modified the Kuru family tree from here slightly to show how Dhritarashtra, Pandu, Vidura and the Kauravas are biological descendants of Sage Vyasa and also how the Pandavas are not his descendants.

enter image description here

The above tree however doesn't mention Yuyutsu who the following tree from here shows. But neither of them show Dushala, only daughter of Dhritrashtra and Gandhari.

enter image description here

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .