8

Sri Venkateswara temple at Tirumala follows Vaikhanasa Agama. Can it be considered a Sri Vaishnava temple?

  • I think its duplicate question – Rakesh Joshi Feb 3 at 12:48
2

Yes.

The term Sri-Vaishnava in common parlance refers to followers of Nammazhvar (Sharanagati) and Ramanuja (Savisheshadvaita philosophy). Both in Pancharatra and Vaikhanasa temples throughout India one can find idols of the Azhvars and Ramanuja. Therefore it is reasonable to assume that Vaikhanasas consider themselves followers of Nammazhvar and Ramanuja, hence are Srivaishnavas.

Nevertheless, here is a statement from Mahamahopadhyaya Srivatsankachar in the introduction to Uttamur Swamy's Vaikhanasa Vijaya which makes it clear that he considers Vaikhanasa as Srivaishnava:

śrīvaiṣṇava āgamāḥ dvividhāḥ - pāñcarātram vaikhānansam iti

netradvayamiva āgamavibhāgadvayamapi viśiṣṭādvaitinām

There are two types of "Srivaishnava Agamas" - Pancharatra and Vaikhanasa. For Visistadvaitins these two Agamas are like the two eyes.

  • The following link says that Vaikhanasas are not Sri Vaishnavas - ramanuja.org/sri/BhaktiListArchives/… – I will close your question Feb 16 at 15:18
  • There is no formal definition for the term 'Sri Vaishnava' as far as I am aware. The author of that page is wrong though to claim that Vaikhanasas do not worship Azhvars. Even Pancharatrins did not worship Azhvars until Nathamuni, Yamunamuni and Ramanuja established the tradition. Every Vaikhanasa temple I have visited (over 30 in Tamilnadu and Andhra Pradesh) have shrines for Azhvars and Ramanuja. Vedanta Desika has utmost respect for the Vaikhanasas. He even says that Vishnu should only be worshipped using either Pancharatra or Vaikhanasa rituals. – hashable Feb 16 at 18:31
  • Is it possible that the alwar, Sri Ramanuja shrines are due to pancaratra influence? If you can read Telugu, please read this - te.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/వైఖానసం The site claims that Sri Ramanuja could possibly have had a hand behind killing of Vaikhanasas. I am not saying the claim is true. But I wonder why Sri Ramanuja converted many temples from Vaikhanasa to Pancharatra. Also, Sri Vaishnavas seem to treat vaikhanasa as inferior to pancharatra. Why would any vaikhanasa follower accept that he/she is inferior? – I will close your question Feb 19 at 18:24
  • I am unable to copy that wiki link properly. If you know Telugu, search for "vaikhanasam telugu wikipedia" and click the Telugu wiki link. – I will close your question Feb 19 at 18:31
  • 1
    The inference is that while Ramanuja merely changed temple practices to be more inclusive, he didn't "convert" anything, at least in temples that already followed Pancharatra/Vaikhanasa. – hashable Feb 19 at 19:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .