So, my question is: Were the Hindu scriptures really tampered with by the British?
And were the original scriptures exported from India in some form? If so, is it possible to compare the two versions and see what the differences are?
There is some evidence for British tampering with Hindu scriptures, though not direct evidence:
In 1784, the famous Indologist Sir William Jones wrote the following
letter to Sir Warren Hastings, Governor General of India, confirming
our suspicions that this was indeed part of their program:
“As to the general extension [spreading] of our pure faith
[Christianity] in Hindoostan [India] there are at present many sad
obstacles to it… We may assure ourselves, that Hindoos will never be
converted by any mission from the church of Rome, or from any other
church; and the only human mode, perhaps, of causing so great a
revolution, will be to translate into Sanscrit… such chapters of the
Prophets, particularly of ISAIAH, as are indisputably evangelical,
together with one of the gospels, and a plain prefatory discourse,
containing full evidence of the very distant ages, in which the
predictions themselves, and the history of the Divine Person (Jesus)
is predicted, were severally made public and then quietly to disperse
the work among the well-educated natives.” (Asiatic Researches Vol. 1.
Published 1979, pages 234-235. First published 1788).
One such work suspected of British Tampering is Bhavishya Purana where Sanskrit verses about Jesus could have been inserted by the British.
More than tampering with scriptures they concocted false racial theories using deliberate misinterpretation of scriptures which is playing havoc even to this day.
For example, "caste" was an invention of the European colonists. They corrupted Varna-Jati-Kula system into caste. Read more about it in this article. Also Aryan Invasion Theory was invented by misinterpretations of Rig Veda. The book "The Rigveda - A Historical Analysis" by Shrikant G Talageri points out some of these misinterpretations such as racially classifying Indian Jatis based on nasal index using a single word in Rig Veda, etc.
Were the Hindu scriptures really tampered with by the British?
Yes. During colonial rule britishers tried to destroy the culture and religion of India. They appointed many peoples for this work in which the most famous was Friedrich Max Müller. I will provide proofs from his letters.
Max Müller was a British agent, especially employed (in 1847) to write the translations of the Vedas in such a demeaning way so that the Hindus should lose faith in them. His personal letter to his wife dated December 9, 1867 reveals this fact.1. TO HIS WIFE, OXFORD, December 9, 1867.
“…I feel convinced, though I shall not live to see it, that this edition of mine and the translation of the Veda will hereafter tell to a great extent on the fate of India, and on the growth of millions of souls in that country. It is the root of their religion, and to show them what that root is, I feel sure, the only way of uprooting all that has sprung from it during the last 3,000 years.”
Max Müller’s letters dated August 25, 1856 and December 16, 1868 reveal the fact that he was desperate to bring Christianity into India so that the religion of the Hindus should be doomed. TO CHEVALIER BUNSEN. 55 ST. JOHN STREET, OXFORD, August 25, 1856.
“India is much riper for Christianity than Rome or Greece were at the time of St. Paul. The rotten tree has for some time had artificial supports… For the good of this struggle I should like to lay down my life, or at least to lend my hand to bring about this struggle. Dhulip Singh is much at Court, and is evidently destined to play a political part in India.”
Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged scripturehistory .
Like any library, Hinduism Stack Exchange shares great information, but does not offer personalized advice, and does not take the place of seeking such advice from any Acharya, Pundit, astrologer, Guru or other trustworthy Counselor.