As I discuss in this question, in the Bala Kanda of Ramayana, Vishwamitra tells Rama and Lakshmana the famous story of the descent of the Ganga river to the Earth. As described in this chapter of the Bala Kanda, Rama's ancestor Sagara once conducted an Ashwamedha Yagna (horse ritual), and Indra, fearing that the yagna would make Sagara too powerful, stole the sacrificial horse so that Sagara couldn't complete the ritual. So Sagara sent his sons to look for the horse, and they scoured the earth trying to find it. As described in the next chapter, Sagara's sons finally found the horse near the ashram of the sage Kapila:

But all those great-souled and great-mighty ones with terrible dash have seen the Infinite Vasudeva in the form of sage Kapila there in the northeast, and oh, descendant of Raghu, they have also seen the ritual-horse moving nearby that sage Kapila, thus all of the sons of Sagara obtained a matchless delight.... 'You the malicious one, you have indeed stolen our ritual-horse, and in fact, you should know that we who arrived here are the sons of Sagara.' Thus Sagara's sons shouted at sage Kapila.... Oh, Rama of Kakutstha, then that great-souled sage Kapila, rather Vishnu with unimaginable power, has rendered all of those sons of Sagara as heaps of ashes by virtue of his 'hum' sound.

It was the quest to scatter the ashes of Sagara's sons in a holy body of water that motivated Sagara's descendant Bhagiratha's famous quest to bring the river Ganga from Devaloka to Earth.

But my question is about this passage's reference to the sage Kapila. For those who don't know, Kapila was an ancient incarnation of Vishnu, born to Brahma's son Kardama and Swayambhuva Manu's daughter Devahuti. He was the founder of the Sankhya school, one of the six Astika or orthodox schools of Hindu philosophy, according to which the universe consists of Purushas or conscious beings interacting with Prakriti or unconscious matter. The Bhagavad Gita is based in large part on a theistic version of Kapila's Sankhya philosophy.

In any case, my question is, is the Ramayana the earliest Hindu scripture which refers to Kapila? There are plenty of references to Kapila after the Ramayana; this chapter and the subsequent chapters of the Srimad Bhagavatam describe the birth of Kapila and how he taught his mother Devahuti. But are there any references to Kapila before the Ramayana? Do the Vedas or Upanishads mention him?

  • Is Devadutta another name of Kapila ?
    – Tezz
    Commented Apr 20, 2016 at 10:41
  • I've never heard of Devadutta as a name of Kapila. Why do you ask? Commented Apr 20, 2016 at 15:09
  • In one Upanishad sankhya theory was disscussed and in bracket (For Devadutta) was written... so I asked..
    – Tezz
    Commented Apr 20, 2016 at 15:12
  • @Tezz What Upanishad are you referring to? Commented Apr 20, 2016 at 15:15
  • Its in Garbha Upanishad but here I think Devadutta refers to any person.. in bracket any person is written after that.... I only found the name kapila in Rudrakshya Upanishad..
    – Tezz
    Commented Apr 20, 2016 at 15:20

1 Answer 1


From Rigveda: Mandal-10, Hynm-27, Verse-16:

दशानामेकं कपिलं समानं तं हिन्वन्ति क्रतवे पार्याय।
गर्भं माता सुधितं वक्षणास्ववेनन्तं तुषयन्ती बिभर्ति॥

dashAnAmekaM kapilaM samAnaM taM hinvanti kratave pAryAya |
garbhaM mAtA sudhitaM vakShaNAsvavenantaM tuShayantI bibharti ||

English translation:

One of the ten, the tawny, shared in common, they send to execute their final purpose.
The Mother carries on her breast the Infant of noble form and soothes it while it knows not.

Sayanacharya consider this refers to sage whereas Bhattacharya state this refers to tawny.
Anyway, this can be considered as the earliest reference to Kapila.

From Shvetashvatar Upanishad: Aadhyaya-5, Verse-2:

यो योनिं योनिमधितिष्ठत्येको विश्वानि रूपाणि योनीश्च सर्वाः ।
ऋषिं प्रसूतं कपिलं यस्तमग्रे ज्ञानैर्बिभर्ति जायमानं च पश्येत् ॥ २॥

yo yoni.n yonimadhitiShThatyeko vishvAni rUpANi yonIshcha sarvAH |
R^iShiM prasUta.n kapila.n yastamagre j~nAnairbibharti jAyamAna.n cha pashyet || 2||

English translation:

He, the non—dual Brahman, who rules over every position; who controls all forms and all sources; who, in the beginning, filled with knowledge the omniscient Hiranyagarbha, His own creation, whom He beheld when He (Hiranyagarbha) was produced—He is other than both knowledge and ignorance.

Though Aacharyas e.g Adi Shankara interpret it as Hiranyagarbha, Note that Svetashvatar Upanishad mentions Kapila and Shankhya (as I've discussed in my this question)
So, This can also be considerd as reference to Kapila.

Besides this some Purans describes/mentions Kapila but according to timeline Purans are later texts/scriptures than Ramayana and you're looking for reference earlier to Ramayana.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .