We can understand that Shiva linga/lingum depicts entire universe or to say existence. But, Saligram is a fossile of a creature of a type Ammonite. What could be the possible reason behind considering ammonite fossil as symbol of lord Vishnu?

Also, it is said that Saligram found at Gandaki River are the only real Saligram used for worship of lord Vishnu? So, all other Ammonite fossils found across the world are not considered Saligram?

  • Because it is so mentioned in the scriptures ... – Rickross Dec 27 '19 at 6:08
  • @Rickross scripts are not mere commands. They always have some reason behind it. – Ubi Bhatt Dec 27 '19 at 6:42
  • There is a story given in the Puranas as to how and why Lord Vishnu assumed the form of a Sila. You can find that story on this site as well. That is the reason why and there are no other reasons. – Rickross Dec 27 '19 at 6:43
  • @Rickross "Sila" means stone, and stones are not fossils. I mean, you can't say "coal" as a stone or dinosaur can't be put into category of stone. So, "Sila" and "Saligram" are two entirely different things. – Ubi Bhatt Dec 27 '19 at 8:00
  • Its called Shaligrama Sila. – Rickross Dec 27 '19 at 8:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .