Bramahasutras mention that it is forbidden for Shudras to listen to Vedic Mantras. Any specific reason for this?

  • 1
    Whatever knowledge Vedic mantras impart, the same can be obtained through Itihasa-Puranas. Different varnas should take different paths to the same knowledge. If everyone tries to take the same path, it leads to disastrous results. To read Vedas, one must have extreme level of self-restraint (no meat,alcohol,porn,gambling), purity (constantly washing hands, feet, mouth), rituals (prayer, puja) etc. But these restrictions are not needed for reading Itihasa-Puranas. Since Shudras' occupation makes it hard to follow those restrictions, they're forbidden to read Vedas. @SethuSrivatsaKoduru
    – ram
    Commented Dec 21, 2020 at 8:17

4 Answers 4


The specific sutras you reference have always been controversial. All the arguments, on all sides, narrow down to one question - who is sudra, who is not; is varna from birth, or from conduct. The specific verses are Brahma Sutras 1.3.34-38. Before quoting these verses and some commentary in both Shankaracharya and Ramanuja, it is best to first reference Chandogya Upanishad as both reference it. The Chandogya Upanishad IV.4.3-5. These verses read (https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/chandogya-upanishad-english/d/doc239072.html):

Verse 4.4.3

स ह हारिद्रुमतं गौतममेत्योवाच ब्रह्मचर्यं भगवति वत्स्याम्युपेयां भगवन्तमिति ॥ ४.४.३ ॥

sa ha hāridrumataṃ gautamametyovāca brahmacaryaṃ bhagavati vatsyāmyupeyāṃ bhagavantamiti || 4.4.3 ||

  1. Satyakāma went to Gautama, the son of Haridrumata, and said: ‘Revered sir, I wish to live with you as a celibate. I have come, revered sir, to be your disciple’.

Word-for-word explanation:

Saḥ ha hāridmmatam gautamam etya, he went to Gautama, the son of Haridrumata; uvāca, [and] said; brahmacaryam bhagavati vatsyāmi, revered sir, I wish to live [with you] as a celibate student; upeyām bhagavantam iti, I have come to you, revered sir, [as a disciple].

Verse 4.4.4

तं होवाच किंगोत्रो नु सोम्यासीति स होवाच नाहमेतद्वेद भो यद्गोत्रोऽहमस्म्यपृच्छं मातरं सा मा प्रत्यब्रवीद्बह्वहं चरन्ती परिचरिणी यौवने त्वामलभे साहमेतन्न वेद यद्गोत्रस्त्वमसि जबाला तु नामाहमस्मि सत्यकामो नाम त्वमसीति सोऽहं सत्यकामो जाबालोऽस्मि भो इति ॥ ४.४.४ ॥

taṃ hovāca kiṃgotro nu somyāsīti sa hovāca nāhametadveda bho yadgotro'hamasmyapṛcchaṃ mātaraṃ sā mā pratyabravīdbahvahaṃ carantī paricariṇī yauvane tvāmalabhe sāhametanna veda yadgotrastvamasi jabālā tu nāmāhamasmi satyakāmo nāma tvamasīti so'haṃ satyakāmo jābālo'smi bho iti || 4.4.4 ||

  1. Gautama asked him, ‘O Somya, what is your lineage?’ Satyakāma said: ‘Sir, I do not know what my lineage is. When I asked my mother, she said to me: “I was very busy serving many people when I was young, and I had you. As this was the situation, I know nothing about your lineage. My name is Jabālā, and your name is Satyakāma.” So, sir, I am Satyakāma Jābāla’.

Word-for-word explanation:

Tam ha uvāca, he [Gautama] said to him; kim gotraḥ nu somya asi iti, O Somya, what is your lineage; saḥ ha uvāca, he [Satyakāma] said; na aham etat veda bhoḥ, I do not know this, sir; yat gotraḥ aham asmi, of what lineage I am; apṛccham mātaram, I asked my mother; sā mā pratyabravīt, she said to me; bahu aham carantī paricāriṇī, I was busy serving many people; yauvane tvām alabhe, I had you when I was young; sā etat, for this reason; aham yat gotraḥ tvam asi na veda, I know nothing about what your lineage is; jabālā tu nāma aham asmi, but my name is Jabālā; satyakāmaḥ nāma tvam asi, your name is Satyakāma; saḥ aham satyakāmaḥ jābālaḥ asmi bhoḥ iti, so I am Satyakāma Jābāla, sir.


Jabālā told Satyakāma the truth and, should anyone ask him, she told him to tell the truth also—irrespective

Verse 4.4.5

तं होवाच नैतदब्राह्मणो विवक्तुमर्हति समिधं सोम्याहरोप त्वा नेष्ये न सत्यादगा इति तमुपनीय कृशानामबलानां चतुःशता गा निराकृत्योवाचेमाः सोम्यानुसंव्रजेति ता अभिप्रस्थापयन्नुवाच नासहस्रेणावर्तेयेति स ह वर्षगणं प्रोवास ता यदा सहस्रं सम्पेदुः ॥ ४.४.५ ॥ ॥ इति चतुर्थः खण्डः ॥

taṃ hovāca naitadabrāhmaṇo vivaktumarhati samidhaṃ somyāharopa tvā neṣye na satyādagā iti tamupanīya kṛśānāmabalānāṃ catuḥśatā gā nirākṛtyovācemāḥ somyānusaṃvrajeti tā abhiprasthāpayannuvāca nāsahasreṇāvarteyeti sa ha varṣagaṇaṃ provāsa tā yadā sahasraṃ sampeduḥ || 4.4.5 || || iti caturthaḥ khaṇḍaḥ ||

  1. Gautama said to him: ‘No non-brāhmin could speak like this. [Therefore, you must be a brāhmin.] O Somya, go and get me some fuel [for the sacrificial fire]. I will initiate you [as a brāhmin by presenting you with the sacred thread], as you have not deviated from truth.’ After the initiation, he selected four hundred feeble and famished cows. Addressing Satyakāma, Gautama said, ‘O Somya, take these cows away [and look after them].’ As Satyakāma was taking them away, he said, ‘I will not come back until there are a thousand of them.’ He lived away for many years until they had become a thousand.

Word-for-word explanation:

Tam ha uvāca, he [Gautama] said to him; na etat abrāhmaṇaḥ vivaktum arhati, no non-brāhmin could speak like this; samidham āhara, get some fuel; somya, O Somya; tvā upaneṣye, I shall initiate you; na satyāt agāḥ iti, you have not deviated from truth; tam upanīya, having initiated him; kṛśānām abalānām catuḥśatāḥ gāḥ, four hundred thin and famished cows; nirākṛtya uvāca, having chosen, he said; somya, O Somya; anusaṃvraja iti, take these away; tāḥ abhiprasthāpayan, as he was leaving with them; uvāca, he [Satyakāma] said; na āvarteya asahasreṇa, I will not come back until they are a thousand in number; saḥ ha varṣagaṇam provāsa, he lived away for a long time; tāḥ yadā sahasram sampeduḥ, until they were a thousand. Iti caturthaḥ khaṇḍaḥ, here ends the fourth section.


The point is, no matter what Satyakāma’s birth was, he had the qualities of a brāhmin—love of truth and learning. Though he had to suffer much hardship living in the forest looking after the cows, he was more concerned with keeping his word than with seeking physical comforts.

Now, Shankara's Brahma Sutras read, Swami Vireswarananda translator (Chapter 1, Section 3, Adikarana IX - https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/brahma-sutras):

Chapter I, Section III, Adhikarana IX

Adhikarana summary: The right of the Sudras to the study of the Vedas discussed

Brahma-Sutra 1.3.34: Sanskrit text and English translation.

शुगस्य तदनादरश्रवणात्, तदाद्रवणात्, सूच्यते हि ॥ ३४॥

śugasya tadanādaraśravaṇāt, tadādravaṇāt, sūcyate hi || 34 ||

śuk—Grief; asya—his; tat-anādaraśravaṇāt—from hearing his (the Rishi’s) contemptuous words; tat—that (grief); ādravaṇāt—owing to his approaching; sūcyate—is referred to; hi—because.

  1. His (King Janasruti’s) grief (arose) from hearing the contemptuous words (of the Rishi in the form of a swan); owing to his approaching (Raikva overwhelmed with) that (grief) (Raikva called him Sudra); because it (the grief) is referred to (by Raikva, who could read his mind).

In the previous Sutra it has been shown that the gods are entitled to the Vedas and Knowledge. This Sutra discusses whether the Sudras are entitled to them or not. Since, like the gods, the Sudras also are possessed of a body, strength, and desires, it naturally follows that they too are entitled. In Chhandogya 4.2.5 Raikva at first calls Janasruti, a Sudra, when he comes for instruction with presents, which are refused. But when he appears a second time, Raikva again calls him a Sudra, but this time accepts his presents and teaches him. So it is maintained that the Sudras also are qualified for Knowledge.

This Sutra refutes the view and denies the right to the study of the Vedas for a Sudra by caste, since the word ‘Sudra’ occurring in the text referred to does not denote a Sudra by birth, which is its conventional meaning, for Janasruti was a Kshatriya king (Chh. 4. 1 . 3). Here we must take the etymological meaning of the word, which is “He rushed into grief” or “He in his grief immediately approached Raikva.” The following Sutra also shows that he was a Kshatriya.

Brahma-Sutra 1.3.35: Sanskrit text and English translation.

क्षत्रियत्वगतेश्चोत्तरत्र चैत्ररथेन लिङ्गात् ॥ ३५ ॥

kṣatriyatvagateścottaratra caitrarathena liṅgāt || 35 ||

kṣatriyatvagateḥ—(His) Kshatriyahood being unknown; ca—and; uttaratra—later on; caitrarathena liṅgāt—by the indicatory sign (of his being mentioned) along with a descendant of Chitraratha (a Kshatriya).

  1. And because the Kshatriyahood (of Janasruti) is known later on by the indicatory sign (of his being mentioned) along with a descendant of Chitraratha (a Kshatriya).

Janasruti is mentioned with the Kshatriya Chaitraratha Abhpratarin in connection with the same Vidya, and so we can infer that Janasruti also was a Kshatriya, for as a rule equals alone are mentioned together.

Brahma-Sutra 1.3.36: Sanskrit text and English translation.

संस्कारपरामर्शात् तदभावाभिलापाच्च ॥ ३६ ॥

saṃskāraparāmarśāt tadabhāvābhilāpācca || 36 ||

saṃskāra-parāmarśāt—Purificatory ceremonies being mentioned; tat-abhāva-abhilāpāt—its absence being declared; ca—and.

  1. Because purificatory ceremonies are mentioned (in the case of the twice-born) and their absence are declared (in the case of the Sudras).

Purificatory ceremonies like Upanayana etc. are declared bv the scriptures to be a necessary condition of the study of all kinds of knowledge or Vidya; but these are meant only for the higher castes. Their absence in the case of the Sudras is repeatedly declared in the scriptures. “Sudras do not incur sin (by eating prohibited food), nor have they any purificatory rights” etc. (Manu 10 . 12 . 6).

Consequently they are not entitled to the study of the Vedas.

Brahma-Sutra 1.3.37: Sanskrit text and English translation.

तदभाव tadabhāvanirdhāraṇe ca pravṛtteḥ || 37 ||

tadabhāva-nirdhāraṇe—On the ascertainment of the absence of that (Sudrahood); ca—and; pravṛtteḥ—from inclination.

  1. And because the inclination (on the part of Gautama to impart Knowledge is seen only) on the ascertainment of the absence of Sudrahood (in Jabala Satyakama).

That Sudras are not qualified is known also from the fact that great teachers like Gautama made sure before imparting Knowledge that disciples like Jabala Satyakama were not Sudras. See Chh. 4. 4. 5.

Brahma-Sutra 1.3.38: Sanskrit text and English translation.

श्रवणाध्ययनार्थप्रतिषेधात् स्मृतेश्च ॥ ३८ ॥

śravaṇādhyayanārthapratiṣedhāt smṛteśca || 38 ||

śravaṇa-adhyayana-artha-pratiṣedhāt—Because of the prohibition of hearing, studying, and understanding; smṛteḥ—in the Smriti; ca—and.

  1. And because of the prohibition in the Smriti of hearing and studying (the Vedas) and knowing their meaning and performing Vedic rites (to Sudras, they are not entitled to the knowledge of Brahman).

Sutras 34-38 disqualify the Sudra for the knowledge of Brahman through the study of the Vedas. But it is possible for them to attain that knowledge through the Puranas and the epics (Ramayana and Mahabharata).

The digression begun from Sutra 26 ends here and the general topic is again taken up.

In Ramanuja's Sri-Bhasya, we see essentially the same verses and meanings. However, we see a slight difference here as the Sri-Bhasya has one more verse that reads (Brahma-Sutras Sri Bhasya, translation by Swami VIreshwarananda):

  1. And on account of Smriti texts (which prohibit hearing and studying of the Vedas by Sudras).

Smritis also prohibit imparting Vedic knowledge to Sudras. 'He is not to teach him (a Sudra) sacred duties or vows.' (Manu IV. 80.).

Who is Sudra? Who is not Sudra? Is Sudra by birth? Or by conduct?

  • it is not mutually exclusive. it is by both birth AND conduct. if someone is wearing army uniform, we salute them. but what if they are coward and flee from battlefield, then we court martial them. uniform is like birth. valor is like conduct. if there is a regular man on the street, we don't salute him. if he proves himself to be brave, then we give him award etc. but still not induct into army just like that.
    – ram
    Commented Apr 14 at 13:49
  • @ram proof Brahmins still get privileges by birth even if they cease vedic study.
    – Haridasa
    Commented Apr 14 at 16:03
  • @Haridasa - the "privilege" is the privilege/authority to study Vedas. if they don't study Vedas, they won't get privilege of being a priest or a upadhyaya or shikshak cos they won't know any mantras. Vedas are so high that even to study them requires punya in previous births which results to brahmin/dwija birth in current life. It's like getting into IIT college. but if you don't study in college, you'll only have the respect of getting into IIT, not graduating from it
    – ram
    Commented Apr 17 at 10:07

As you may know it is forbidden to recite Vedic mantras near a corpse.

Manu Smriti 4.108. In a village where a corpse lies, in the presence of a (man who lives as unrighteously as a) Sudra, while (the sound of) weeping (is heard), and in a crowd of men the (recitation of the Veda must be) stopped.

Now, in some scriptures a Sudra is compared to a Shava or a dead body. Hence Vedic mantras mustn't be recited near him. Although this might sound to some as discriminatory and offensive, this is one reason being given in scriptures.

For example, from Vashishta Dharma Sutras Chapter16:

[Children] begotten by Brahmanas, Kshatriyas and Vais'yas on women of the next lower, second lower and third lower castes become Nishadas. [The son of a Bramhana] by a S'udra woman [is] a Parasava.

They say that the condition of a Parasava is that of one,, who, albeit living, is a corpse. The designation of a dead body is S'ava.

Some say that a S'udra is a corpse ; therefore, the Veda must not be recited near a S'udra.

Now they quote the following verses as an example from Yama-Gita. These Sudras, who are of sinful deeds, are manifestly a cremation ground. Therefore, the Veda shall never be recited near a S-'udra.

But I don't understand the Yama Gita verse being quoted. It assumes that any Sudra is of sinful deeds but which might not be the case. Vidura, for example, a counter example from the scriptures.

  • Sir its symbolic right?Not literal? Commented Dec 20, 2020 at 12:36
  • 1
    I think example of Vidura cannot be take because he is mix caste, Bhishma in shanti parva said duties are prescribed for four varnas only and for mixed castes texts are silent hence they have some freedom when it comes to choosing. Commented Dec 20, 2020 at 12:46
  • 1
    "Vidura said, 'I am born in the Sudra order and, therefore, do not venture to say more than what I have already said. " @AnubhavSingh Vidura himself says this in Mahabharata.
    – Rickross
    Commented Dec 20, 2020 at 12:58
  • Occupations and duties for the mixed castes are prescribed in scriptures too for e.g. in Manu. So scriptures aren't silent on that @AnubhavSingh
    – Rickross
    Commented Dec 20, 2020 at 13:04
  • May be not literal because after all they are living beings @SethuSrivatsaKoduru
    – Rickross
    Commented Dec 21, 2020 at 6:49

Sudras are majority 85% of society and they were Engineers, Metal Works, Potters, Carpenters, Artisans, Craftsmen, Tradesmen, Peasants, Weavers, Cart-builders and other Service Professions . If they stopped all works to build society and study Vedas how will society run? Study of each Veda takes 12 years with lots of restrictions on food, wealth etc. The special duty of a Brahmacarin is begging for alms, service to the preceptor, study, sacrificial rites, and renunciation.” (Garuda Purana 1.49.5). Does this sound appealing to everyone? Who can't wait to spend their entire childhood living a hand-to-mouth existence, begging for food, carrying out menial tasks just to learn something you can never make money doing? The Bramhin path was never a materially lucrative one. Who wants to live 12+ years as a celibate student, tonsured, begging for food? Our Rishis were always compassionate to give the same knowledge in form of Epics and Puranas. One can happily obtain Jnana from them. Narada Muni, Suta Goswami, Vidura, DharmaVyadha, Kapinjalada, Matanga obtained Jnana in similar way. Narada Muni was a Sudra, but by serving acharyas and obtaining Brahma Jnana, Narada Muni meditated and got darshan of Lord Vishnu. Suta Goswami was from Mixed Caste but Rishis still bestowed knowledge upon him. In Gita Mahatyama, Adi Shankaracharya says “Because Bhagavad-gita is spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one need not read any other Vedic literature. One need only attentively and regularly hear and read Bhagavad-gita. In the present age, people are so absorbed in mundane activities that it is not possible for them to read all the Vedic literatures. But this is not necessary. This one book, Bhagavad-gita, will suffice, because it is the essence of all Vedic literatures and especially because it is spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. All the Upanisads are like a cow, and the milker of the cow is Lord Shri Krishna, the son of Nanda. Arjuna is the calf, the beautiful nectar of the Gita is the milk, and the fortunate devotees of fine theistic intellect are the drinkers and enjoyers of that milk.”

  • All the four orders, therefore, have always the right to the performance of all pious duties and of sacrifices (MB Santi CLXXXVII)
  • Sufficient liberty of action is left to them in consequence of which all individuals may attain to an equality of condition. (MB Anu CLXIV)
  • Maheshwara says to Umadevi: Brahma himself has said that even though a Shudra, if he has pure inner soul and is Jitendriya, then he should be treated as a Brahmana.(MB Anu Parva 142,Shl 49)
  • If satya, daana, karunya, lajja, daya and tapas are found in a Shudra then he does not remain a Shudra. Similarly if Satya etc qualities are not there in a brahmana then he will not remain a Brahmana.(MB Shanti 198)
  • O ruler of the Videhas, Brahmins learned in the Vedas, monarch,regard a (virtuous) Sudra as equal to a Brahmin himself. I, however,O king, look upon such a Sudra as effulgent Vishnu of the universe,the foremost one in all the worlds.” (MB Shanti 302,Shl 12-18)
  • Lord Krishna says “The person who bestows transcendental knowledge upon the members of all the spiritual orders of society is one’s ultimate spiritual master. Indeed, he is as good as My own self.” (SB 10.80.32)
  • Yajnavalkya says By obtaining brahmajnana from a brahmana or kshatriya or vysya or shudra or even a person of low caste, person with faith should constantly practice the same.(MB Shanti 378,Shl 87)
  • Because people of all varnas are born from Brahma, they are all Brahmanas. All are all the time reciting the name of Brahma. I am telling the correct shastra by the buddhi given by Brahma. Entire universe and this visible world is nothing but Brahma. Therefore whatever be the varna, they should not be considered as being different from Brahma(MB Shanti 378,Shl 90)
  • He continues” I have already told you that people of all varnas can remain in their ashrama-dharmas and obtain jnana. Therefore, whether a person dedicated to jnana of any varna he will surely get moksha; this is the opinion of scholars.”(MB Shanti 378,Shl 91)
  • Hanuman says that “For all four varnas meditation (dhyana) was the main karma. Paramatma who shines like a lamp in all hearts will be the Adhishtana-Murthy for all varnas.‘Omkara’ alone was their main mantra. All four varnas followed only Upanishad Dharma.They all worshipped only the Jyoti-Swarupa Paramatma who resides in all hearts”(MB Anu 149)
  • 2
    The key part is that Shudras need not read (and should not) Vedas to obtain Jnana. They can get it from Itihasa-Puranas.
    – ram
    Commented Dec 21, 2020 at 8:14
  • 1
    That's all I wanted to say @ram Ji - Whoever is interested-Rishis teach and bestow them Jnana. Bhagavata itself tells that Narada Muni and Suta Goswami were Sudra and Mixed Caste respectively but Rishis accepted them. Vidura Dharmavyadha Sanjaya etc all aquired Bramha Jnana without Vedas. Yajnavalkya and Bhisma say this path of Moksha is accessible to all Humans. Even in Anu Gita Krishna said Brahma Jnana can liberate everyone. So there's no loss if Sudras cant read Veda and indeed its a previlage for them. I agree for 100%. I wonder why my answer is downvoted so much??Any idea sir?? Commented Dec 21, 2020 at 10:13
  • @Rickross Who is he sir?Why is he doing it??SE subtracted 140 of my points simply yesterday! Commented Dec 22, 2020 at 6:02
  • Sure @Rickross Ji! Commented Dec 22, 2020 at 6:23

Enough of the ramblings and desperate attempts to accommodate some of the most cruel and hypocritical Brahminical passages in having some merit. Assuming that the Brahma Sutra did have this Section on Sudras, how do you explain the wickedness of the language

"The Smriti prohibits their hearing the Veda, their studying and understanding the Veda and their performing Vedic rites. "The ears of him who hears the Veda are to be filled with molten lead and lac." For a Sudra is like a cemetery. Therefore the Veda is not to be read in the vicinity of a Sudra. "His tongue is to be slit if he pronounces it; his body is to be cut through if he preserves it." Sudras like Vidura and the religious hunter Dharma Vyadha acquired knowledge owing to the after effects of former deeds in past births. It is possible for the Sudras to attain that knowledge through the Puranas, Gita and the epics, Ramayana and Mahabharata which contain the quintessence of the Vedas. It is a settled point that the Sudras do not possess any such qualification with regard to the Veda."

  • 2
    cherry picking. Manu smriti says a brahmin should drink molten lead until his insides burn to death if he as much as drinks a shot of alcohol. whereas shudras are free to booze all they want. why the partiality towards shudras by the famed Manu (who is a kshatriya not a brahmin) ? it's simple - more rules, more respect. less rules, less respect. both shudras and brahmins are entitled to have molten lead poured into them - former for listening to vedas, latter for drinking alcohol. i don't see any bias here.
    – ram
    Commented Apr 14 at 13:52
  • @ram agreed, but is it purposeful or accidental? Also other verses in Manu state a king shouldn't physically punish a Brahmin, so who would do the punishing.
    – Haridasa
    Commented Apr 14 at 16:04
  • @Haridasa - what do u mean by accidental ? and brahmin would self-punish
    – ram
    Commented Apr 17 at 10:05
  • @ram If a Shudra is walking around without the intention to here somehow lost or what not or a very small child then the crime is nullified correct? If one is not capable of understanding the crime due to age or didn't believe he commited the crime when in the vacinity of a Brahmin.
    – Haridasa
    Commented Apr 17 at 10:16
  • @ram Brahmins cannot be punished capitally by the king, so someone else has to punish.
    – Haridasa
    Commented Apr 17 at 10:16

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .