I have read in multiple places that Shankaracharya champions the idea that whereas mere works (that is, those that are not accompanied with meditation) lead one only to the worlds of manes to the worlds of devas, but those that are accompanied with meditation are capable of leading one from the world of devas to the world of Prajapati/Hiranyagarbha. I can quote at least two such instances from the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad at the moment (refer to the introduction here and the commentary to the Bhujyu Brahmana (refer to pg 213 of the translation by Swami Nikhilananda. My question is regarding the latter portion. Is there any evidence from the Srutis in support of the argument that works coupled with meditation on Brahman can only lead one until the world of Hiranyagarbha at the most? At the outset, this idea seems to contradict the words of Lord Krishna in the Gita, but I could pull up more references from the other prasthAna trayi texts as well.

Here are some instances where Krishna strongly voices that works should done and cannot be given up even if one has excelled in meditation (referring to the slokas:

karmaṇaiva hi saṁsiddhim āsthitā janakādayaḥ loka-saṅgraham evāpi sampaśyan kartum arhasi (3.20)

etāny api tu karmāṇi saṅgaṁ tyaktvā phalāni ca kartavyānīti me pārtha niścitaṁ matam uttamam (18.6)

niyatasya tu sannyāsaḥ karmaṇo nopapadyate mohāt tasya parityāgas tāmasaḥ parikīrtitaḥ (18.7)

saha-jaṁ karma kaunteya sa-doṣam api na tyajet (18.48)

He further states that works are capable of leading one to perfection:

sve sve karmaṇy abhirataḥ saṁsiddhiṁ labhate naraḥ (18.45)

sva-karmaṇā tam abhyarchya siddhiṁ vindati mānavaḥ (18.46)

and the perfection that Krishna is referring to is clearly moksha which is the subject matter of the overall text and the 'tam' is clearly referring to that Brahman.

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .