Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Hinduism Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for followers of the Hindu religion and those interested in learning more about Hinduism. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Recently I have come across a few stotras with phalasruthi saying that these stotras can cleanse the past life sins. I'm citing Dwadasa jyotirlinga stotra as an example.
When you say,”clean up sins”,I understand this as nullifying their fruits. Now,how do you assume that the fruits of the karma of previous births can’t be nulled?In this aspect,certain karma we do now,is/may be able.But there is a limit to this.Bhagavatam says that devotion to Lord Krishna can wipe away all the karmic entanglement of our previous births..
They mean Sanchita and Adhruda Prarabdha. That can be cleaned. But Prarabdha which is Hard or Dhruda Prarabdha cannot be changed. Karma is of three types Sanchita, Prarabdha and Agami. Prarabdha cannot be cleaned. Sanchita can be cleaned.
Verse in your question says सप्त जन्म कृतं पापं. It doesn’t say karma.
You are mistaking by thinking that Prarabhdha karma are only Sins. Prarabhdha karma can also be any karma (even good) that is tied to worldly desires.
When verse says that paap/sins are destroyed, it literally means sins. Sins are like bad karma. We commit sins from mind, speech and body. Details are given in Padma Purana
मानवा मर्त्यलोके च पापं कुर्वंति दारुणम् ।
तेषां कर्मविपाकं च मातले वद सांप्रतम् ॥ २ ॥
This will help you understand here what sins are.
These kind of sinful acts are destroyed by pilgrimage or chanting stotrams. But Prarabdha karma can never be destroyed.
One for example
Verse from Lingashtakam that clarifies it is “sanchit paap”.
To provide you example to understand your dilemma :
Story of Jad Bharat from Srimad Bhagvatam.
Bharatji got attached to deer so much that it disturbed his spiritual practices. He didn’t commit any sin as such. It was just his karmas towards deer (and past actions towards sons) that he had fall from spiritual practice and had to reborn.
What I meant to tell you is that karmas which are not necessarily sinful , and tied to worldly desires are the blocker for liberation and (those karma) cannot be destroyed by any means. Only sinful karmas can be destroyed.
Hence verses are correct when they says sins are destroyed. Verses don’t say Prarabdha karma are destroyed. Hope it clarifies.
b)The Srimad Bhagavatam says that devotion to Sri Krishna wipes away karma from our past lives(the verse was referenced in the topic of moksha/rebirth,due to past karma).How does this answer fit in this context?
@Amethyst With devotion (Bhakti yoga), prarabdha karma becomes powerless (says Tripura Rahasya). It means there are effects but yogi feels no pain no happiness (says Gita). That how you should understand meaning of karma destroyed
How is it that Hemaganda and Lord Krishna’s statement clash(Sri Krishna says “sarva karmani”,without exception,while Hemaganda essentially is providing a counter argument)
It is not possible that reciting that stotra will clean up sins of 7 births. Such statements are arthavad and not meant to be taken literally. More precisely it is an example of stuti.
Arthavada is of four kinds, ninda (censure), stuti (eulogy), parakrti
(performance by another great person) and purakalpa (what happened in
bygone ages).
A concise Encyclopedia of Hinduism by Swami Harshananda
Why is it a stuti? Why can't it be understood literally?
It can't be understood literally since it is not possible to attain moksha just by reading any scripture let alone clean up sins of seven births. If by reading a stotra or scripture one can help attain moksha then there will be no need to do dhyana or japa or puja.
Sastras
They study the Vedas and discuss. But they do not realize the Ultimate
Reality just as a spoon does not know the taste of food.
The head carries the flowers, the nose knows the scent. The people
study the Vedas. But, very few persons understand the same.
Not knowing the Reality of the self, a fool is infatuated by the
sastras. When the goat stands in the shed, the shepherd seeks for it
in the well in vain.
The knowledge of the sastras is not competent to destroy the
infatuation accruing from worldly affairs.
….
Having studied the Vedas and realized their essence the wise man
should leave all the sastras just as one desiring corn leaves the
husk.
Just as one satiated with nectar has no use of food, no one who is in
search of Reality has anything to do with the sastras.
One cannot obtain release by reading the Vedas or the sastras. Release
comes from experience, not otherwise, O son of Vinata.
[Garuda Purana, Dharma Khanda, Chapter XLIX]
Since one cannot understand the statement literally, one is forced to explore alternative meanings. The statement is encouraging the reader to engage in spiritual practices in order to attain mental purity.
For the attainment of mental purity, spiritual aspirants (Yogins)
perform action devoid of attachment, with their body, mind, intellect
or even merely with their senses.
Gita 5.11
The stotra is making the case that by constantly reading it, i.e. engaging one's intellect in spiritual matters, will gradually lead to spiritual practices like dhyana, japa, puja that will purify the mind of the reader and ultimately lead to moksha.
@Pandya a statement is an arthavad when a literal reading of it leads to absurdity. In this case reading that stotra will not lead to the attainment of moksha let alone clean up the sins of 7 births. So one is pretty much forced to look at an implied meaning.
Moksha wouldn't be attained by not having sins anyway. That would mean everyone would get moksha in their first birth immediately. Or immediately after going to Naraka.
Like any library, Hinduism Stack Exchange shares great information, but does not offer personalized advice, and does not take the place of seeking such advice from any Acharya, Pundit, astrologer, Guru or other trustworthy Counselor.
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.