Is there a Puranic basis for Graha relationships in Jyotisha? Else what is their basis as is traditionally taught?

Question

Below is a tabulated form of the friends, the neutrals and the enemies of each graha as per Jyotisha. (Source):

Graha	Friend	Neutral	Enemy
Surya	Chandra, Mangala, Guru	Budha	Shukra, Shani
Chandra	Surya, Guru	Mangala, Budha, Shukra, Shani	-
Mangala	Surya, Chandra, Guru	Shukra, Shani	Budha
Budha	Surya, Shukra	Mangala, Guru, Shani	Chandra
Guru	Surya, Chandra, Mangala	Shani	Budha, Shukra
Shukra	Budha, Shani	Mangala, Guru	Surya, Chandra
Shani	Budha, Shukra	Guru	Surya, Chandra, Mangala

Interestingly if one observes, some of these relationships have a Puranic backing. For example,

1. Due to the Tarakama Yuddha, Budha hates Chandra for his misdemeanour, Guru being Guru of even Chandra, is friendly with him but is inimical towards the product of Chandra’s misdemeanour i.e. Budha.
2. Surya hates Shani for supposedly eclipsing him when he was born.
3. Guru hates Shukra being Daitya Guru. Wonder why Shukra doesn’t reciprocate?
4. Surya Chandra Mangala Guru are mutual friends (except one case of neutrality), which can be attributed to Guru being these Deva planets’ Guru.

Question:
Are there any such Puranic legends which can serve in providing the reason for the friendly, neutral and inimical relationships between Grahas. If yes, please mention very briefly (1-2 lines per relation) with citation.

If besides those mentioned, there are none, then please provide some basis or logic for their relationships like their nature of Deva, Daitya, etc.; Varna; ruling tattvas, etc. or another logic/ way for easy remembrance as is traditionally taught. It’s very difficult to remember otherwise.

---

^{Note: Mentioning incidents and citation from Purāṇa is sufficient eg. tarakama Yuddha, Matsya Purāṇa Chapter XYZ, else answer will become very long. If no story then basic explanation with 2-3 examples for the traditional way/logic/basis for remembering will suffice. Also do correct if something above has been written down wrongly. Information about Rahu Ketu is more than welcome.}

Answer 1

please provide some basis or logic for their relationships

There's definitely a secondary and hidden meaning into the relationships, that is not possible to give to laymen outside the Sampradaaya.

As for the basic, easily available reasoning, it's in Brihat Paraashara Hora Shastra:

Source

You can do the calculations yourself based on ownerships of Raashis by Grahas as well as MulaTrikona of Grahas. Or maybe another person can edit my answer and do that.

I'm posting the relevant table here since I had it lying around, although it's not in English.

The Grahas in Italics, the Raashis are owned by themselves. As for Shukra's enemies, Brhaspati is taken out of it since Shukra is exalted in Pisces (owned by Brhaspati) and he is put as neutral (which is not shown in this table). The same is the case for Mangala with regards to Shani.