Bhagawan Shree Ramakrishna Paramahamsa is known to have said Jato Mat Tato Pat, means As my religions so many paths.
The Ramakrishna mission considers Jesus as a manifestation of divine and Muhammad to be divinely inspired by God.
But both these religions despite divinely inspired refuse the concept of reincarnation which is considered a basic non negotiable fact in Dharmic religions, which Shri Bhagawan Ramakrishna Paramahamsa represented.
How could Jesus be wrong about such a fundamental reality when he is considered an embodiment of divine. How could Prophet Muhammad be wrong when he was divinely inspired.
How is this reconciled in Shri Ramakrishna-Vivekananda system of belief?
Please don't give your own opinion. Quote Shri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa or Vivekananda or Monks of the Ramakrishna order speaking about reincarnation and Jesus.
Note: This is not off topic Shri Ramakrishna Mission and its modern interpretation of Hinduism is an integral part of Hindusim, and the tenets of it, belong to the subset of Hinduism. This question is addressing the followers of Ramakrishna Paramahamsa
This is not opinion based The question of somebody's opinion is factual question about someone's opinion. For Eg, If I ask how did Shri Adi Shankaracharya solve a particular problem regarding Maya, you can't say it's opinion based even though it is asking about the opinion of Shri Adi Shankaracharya, as him having that opinion is a fact. So if a question asks about Adi Shankaracharya's opinion about Maya, then it is a factual question. In the same way this question is asking how does followers of Shri Ramakrishna Mission answer this question.
Not a duplicate of this question The question is asking a general why do enlightened people contradict each other within Dharmic tradition. One important thing to note is, within Dharmic traditions that is Buddhism, Jainism, Hinduism and Sikhism there is bo metaphysical factual contradictions. There are interpretive contradictions, that is there is no one real phenomenon which directly disproves the other. But factual disagreement have a phenomenon which can't be disputed based on interpretation. Like the Earth is sphere, no enlightened person can say Earth is flat, and say enlightened people disagree, when it can be proved objectively that it is false. In the same way reincarnation is a phenomenon which can be verified by people recollecting memories kf past lives and saying facts which they couldn't have known otherwise. And Yogis can literally see soul of one person being reborn, this is not a poetic interpretation of some fact, this is the fact. Also this question addresses Ramakrishna Mission unlike the otger question which is general, I'm more it interested how Ramakrishna Mission people solve it and their opinion on it, rather than the general mass. So it is not the same question.