2

I was watching this video about the Ramayana. Towards the end, it says that several characters in the Ramayana can be called the hero in the context of Hindu beliefs and traditions, because they all follow their respective Dharma, including Hanuman, Sita, Lakshman and Jatayu.

While not in this video, I remember reading somewhere (I don't remember where) that every character of the Ramayana upholds Dharma: including Dhasharatha, Kaikeyi, Bharata and even Ravana.

But these are not scholarly/ academic sources. The book mentioned in the video also only cursorarily touches on the Ramayana, it is an introductory mythology textbook and not specifically about the Ramayana.

I found this perspective very interesting and would want to read more about it. Are there good scholarly books/ research papers etc. that explore this perspective? I would be grateful if I could find some references suggested to me for reading.

1 Answer 1

2

I have confined this answer from the perspective of Valmiki Ramayana only, for there exist multiple Ramayanas in different languages, and even in Sanskrit. Several Puranas and even Mahabharata (another ithihasa) reference it.

No. Not every character follows their Dharma. That might be the videomaker's oversight of the subtlety of Dharma & Adharma.

We'll use the negation principle to answer your question.

In any case, Ravana transgresses the Dharma in several instances. Ravana is the epitome of Adharma in the Valmiki Ramayana.

1. The forceful abduction of goddess Sita.

In Chapter 49, Book 3 - Aranya Kanda of the Valmiki Ramayana, Ravana forcefully abducts the goddess Sita.

  • My counter-question is, what Dharma is there in Ravana forcefully abducting a woman, against her wish?

Obviously none. The Shastras mostly shun such acts.

As Jatayu says in III.49.6,11,12

कथम् राजा स्थितो धर्मे पर दारान् परामृशेत् । रक्षणीया विशेषेण राज दारा महाबलः ॥ ६ ॥

"How a king adhering to probity can lay his hands on the wives of others? If it is a king's wife, oh, great-mighty Ravana, she is to be safeguarded particularly.

...

पाप स्वभावः चपलः कथम् त्वम् रक्षसाम् वर । ऐश्वर्यम् अभिसंप्राप्तो विमानम् इव दुष्कृती ॥ ११ ॥ काम स्वभावो यः सः असौ न शक्यः तम् प्रमार्जितुम् । न हि दुष्ट आत्मनाम् आर्यम् आवसति आलये चिरम् ॥ १२ ॥

You by your nature are a devilish and mercurial personality though you have come from a decent lineage, how you have become an outranking demon among demons and how you could attain kingdom, which is to be ruled righteously, like an evildoer attaining a heaven-bound aircraft. He whose nature is such, that nature is perhaps impossible to efface, a sermon does not dwell in the heart of an evil-minded one for a long time, indeed

Clearly, Ravana is not only Adharmic but also, evil.




2. The harassment of Vedavati

Chapter 17, Book 7 - Uttarakanda of the Valmiki Ramayana Ravana harasses Vedavati (in the age of Satayuga), subsequent to which Vedavati is forced to immolate herself to preserve her chastity.

एवमुक्तस्तया तत्र वेदवत्या निशाचरः । मूर्धजेषु तदा कन्यां कराग्रेण परामृशत् ॥ २७ ॥ ततो वेदवती क्रुद्धा केशान्हस्तेन सा ऽच्छिनत् । असिर्भूत्वा करस्तस्याः केशांश्छिन्नांस्तदा ऽकरोत् ॥ ७.१७.२८ ॥

At these words of Vedavati, that Ranger of the Night seized hold of the hair of that young girl, whereupon Vedavati, in indignation, cut off her hair with her hand which had been transformed into a sword.

There is no Dharma in harassing pious women observing penance.




To Conclude:

  • Not 'everyone' in the Ramayana was adhering to their Dharma. Ravana perhaps is the foremost of those examples.

  • What the OP heard viz. every character of the Ramayana upholds Dharma: including Dhasharatha, Kaikeyi, Bharata and even Ravana. is thus proven wrong because Ravana was not Dharmic.

  • Regarding your last question Are there good scholarly books/ research papers etc. that explore this perspective? - I'm personally helpless in that regard.

2
  • 1
    not an answer. Ravana's actions have to be judged by Rakshasa Dharma.
    – S K
    Commented May 20, 2022 at 11:50
  • 1
    As per Rakshasa dharma too he is wrong. He is told in Sundarakanda (can’t place where exactly) that for Rakshasa vivaha the consent of the woman is important, you cannot just pick her up randomly and take her, that too someone’s lawfully wedded wife. So as per Rakshasa dharma too he’s in the wrong.
    – Adiyarkku
    Commented May 21, 2022 at 4:41

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .