Was he actually a huge Shiva bhakt or was it exaggerated to make him look good?
-
1What makes you say this?– Wikash_Commented Jun 25, 2023 at 12:16
-
@Wikash_ nothing against Ravan but little bit of Valmiki Ramayan, I have read shows him in very negative light so I am curious if he was actually Shiv bhakt or people romanticized him. Just curiosity– RambhaktCommented Jun 25, 2023 at 17:30
-
He was actually a Shiv bhakt.– Wikash_Commented Jun 26, 2023 at 6:28
-
1There is no proof of him being a Shiv bhakt. These are later Interpretations or even Propaganda to counter the Ram movement.– RajeshCommented Jun 29, 2023 at 9:23
2 Answers
No, he was NOT a devotee of Lord Shiva at all. It's a made up story based on some later Interpretations or may be even propaganda.
More details here
Far from any “Shiva Bhakti”, Ravana actually battles with Rudras on a number of occasions.
there is ONLY one instance in the entire Valmiki Ramayana, that too in Uttarakanda (7.31 CE), that Ravana worships Shiva. There is NOTHING anywhere else to even remotely suggest “Shiva Bhakti”. There is no ‘Shiva Tandava Stotram’ anywhere in the Valmiki Ramayana.
Raavan didn't even know who Shiva was:
“Hearing Nandi’s words, Ravana, with his earrings trembling in his wrath, his eyes red with fury, leapt down from the Pushpaka Chariot and approaching the foot of the peak, demanded:—
“‘Who is this Shankara?’
What is the benefit of "romanticizing" an antagonist other than teaching people that look, no matter how big of a worshipper you are, how much knowledge you posses, how powerful you are - nothing matters in the end when you have stepped away from the path of Dharma and Maryada.
As per the many interpretations of Ramayana, one can definitely say he was a big Shiv bhakt, some would argue even the biggest. There's the story about him lifting the Kailash Parvat to demonstrate his power to Shiva, if he was not a bhakt then why would he do that? Then there's the live example of his bhakti as Shiv Tandav Stotram, why would he compose it for no reason?
Now it is hard to go back thousands of years in the past, and in yugs and find out the truth, but from what we read, what we hear, he definitely was a big Shiv bhakt, no doubt, and not only that but he was also a great scholar of the Vedas, he had immense knowledge, and the very essence of his story is that no matter how powerful or knowledgeable you are, adharma always comes to an end, and that arrogance has no place.
-
Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.– Community BotCommented Jun 26, 2023 at 12:19
-
Can you post some links as evidence to the claim "As per the many interpretations of Ramayana, one can definitely say he was a big Shiv bhakt, some would argue even the biggest. There's the story about him lifting the Kailash Parvat to demonstrate his power to Shiva" ? These episodes seem to be modern myths than in any of the actual texts– RajeshCommented Aug 17, 2023 at 12:01