As I discuss in this question, one of the early movements that was important in the development of Vaishnavism was the ancient Pancharatra movement, whose sacred texts consisted of detailed procedures to worship the sage Narayana, an ancient incarnation of Vishnu who was the son of Yama god of death and twin brother of the sage Nara. (Nara and Narayana were the previous births of Arjuna and Krishna respectively.) Among the oldest Pancharatra texts we have are the Satvata Samhita, Paushkara Samhita, and Jayakhya Samhita.

But there are some Pancharatra texts that are part of other Hindu scriptures. For instance, a Pancharatra text called the Narayaniya is embedded in the Shanti Parva of the Mahabharata, as I discuss in this question. Similarly, there's a Pancharatra text called the Vasudeva Mahatmya in the Skanda Purana, which is the subject of my question. In this excerpt from the Vasudeva Mahatmya, Vishnu tells Brahma about the various incarnations he is planning to take, and here are the last ones he mentions:

By becoming Buddha, I shall delude by the use of fallacious reasoning and deceit the Asuras who adopting Vedic practices will harass the three worlds.

When the Asuras killed by me as Krishna and by Arjuna in the battles, will promote and establish Adharma (unrighteous practices) on the earth, I, sage Narayana, shall be born on the earth from my devotee Dharmadeva in the land of Koshala, as a Brahmana singer of Saman hymns. O Aja (Brahma), establishing the boly Dharma I shall be the protector of sages who will be born as men by the curse of Munis (other sages) as well as Uddhava, O child.

At the end of Kali I shall incarnate as Kalki. Riding a divine horse, I shall kill highly sinful people of Mleccha origin.

I discuss Buddha being an incarnation of Vishnu in my answer here, and I discuss Kalki in my answer here. But my question is, who is the incarnation of Vishnu mentioned between Buddha and Kalki, the "Brahmana singer of Saman hymns" who would be born in Koshala to Dharmadeva? And who are the sages were cursed to be born as ordinary men?

Apparently the Swaminarayan sect believes that this text is a prophecy about their founder Swaminarayan, whom they consider to be an incarnation of Vishnu. They reach this conclusion because Swaminarayan was born a short distance from Ayodhya, capital of Koshala, and his father is sometimes called Dharmadev. I don't want to speculate about whether their claims are correct or not, but let me just ask, have other Hindus come up with any alternative interpretations of this passage?

  • think in reverse, what possible signs you can see if the current Swaminarayan Sampradaya is fake. How the scriptures of the sect might be, and how it is? What might be the influence and how is the influence? Because chances are pretty low that you find someone else claiming that. Best of luck. It is okay to hurt someone to find the truth. at the that is what it matters. – Nixit Patel Oct 13 '15 at 6:02
  • @NixitPatel Well, I certainly don't think the Swaminarayan sect is "fake"; it's followers are presumably sincere in their beliefs. The question is whether it's true. (I don't think influence is a good metric, because an incorrect belief can spread as easily as a correct one.) As a Sri Vaishnava, I have several disagreements with the beliefs of their Swaminarayan sect, including their emphasis on Radha and Goloka and their belief in five Tattvas rather than three. – Keshav Srinivasan Oct 13 '15 at 12:33
  • 1
    sorry for the delay in the response, I am in US. took me some time to do research about the books, there is not English translation available for the bhasy, I might be able to find the e compy of muktanand swami bhasy: which is in sanskrit, and I can also try to get you bhasy of bhadreshdas swami. but those are not in english yet – Nixit Patel Apr 28 '16 at 17:18
  • 1
    VasudevMahatmay from Skand Puran goes almost untouched throughout the time in history. I think the reason would be... in the history there was almost kind of war, between ShivaPanthi and VaishnvaPanthi, most of the Vaishnav consider SkandPuran as the tamsic. and shivpanthi would not read the part of the Vasudev Mahatmay. – Nixit Patel Apr 28 '16 at 17:25
  • 1
    Influence, what I meant is hard to explain. these things... are not visible... I am not expert, but let me ask: what is the highest level of "Spirituality" one grihastha can have during his life? I am not talking about sadhu. I am talking about grihastha. – Nixit Patel Apr 28 '16 at 23:14

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by Community Oct 2 '17 at 0:04

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Browse other questions tagged .