There is a big debate going on in the internet as to whether Kaaba was initially a Shiva temple. The following are arguments from the side of Hindus who support this theory.

  1. Kaaba is derived from Kaabalishwara - The name of Shiva after he took crescent moon on his head. Crescent moon in the symbol of Islam.
  2. The stone that Haj pilgrims embrace is very similar or identical to Yoni of the Shivalinga. They also claim that the Shivlinga itself was removed and inserted in the SE corner of Kaaba.
  3. Practices like Circumambulation of the Kaaba 7 times which is similar to Vedic practice of Circumambulating Pradana Shtalas in temples.
  4. Inscriptions praising Emperor Vikramadithya in the Makhtab-e-Sultania library in Turkey which supposedly proves Vedic influence in Middle-East.
  5. Long standing trade connection between Kerala and Arabia.
  6. The first follower of Islam after the prophet, Malik Deenar came to Kerala and performed conversion of King Cheramal Perumal to Islam.
  7. Pagan Arab Priests of Kaaba and their Namboodhiri Brahmin ancestry.
  8. There is Triad of Godesses in pre-islamic Arabia (Al-Uzza,Al-Lat and Menat) just like Saraswati/Parvati/Lakshmi.
  9. The remains of Medein Saleh are said to have contained multi-armed idols.

Is there any truth to the above claims and many other similar claims in this regard?


  1. Was the Kaaba Originally a Hindu Temple? By P.N. Oak (Historian)

  2. http://www.hinduism.co.za/kaabaa.htm

  3. https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/01/04/is-the-kaaba-an-ancient-hindu-shiva-temple-confiscated-by-mohammed/comment-page-4/

  4. http://www.quora.com/Is-Kaaba-an-ancient-Hindu-Shiva-temple-confiscated-by-Muhammad-during-raids

  5. http://ajitvadakayil.blogspot.in/2015/02/madain-saleh-destruction-of-ancient.html

  6. http://www.thaliatook.com/AMGG/arabtriple.html

  • 1
    Do you have references that you can provide for the above statements? Please do so. – Swami Vishwananda May 10 '15 at 5:07
  • IMHO it would be very difficult to find accurate historical sources to corroborate any of the statements you have made. – Aditya K May 10 '15 at 17:50
  • @SwamiVishwananda These are only claims with no conclusive proofs, so not sure what kind of reference will be satisfactory in this forum. I have added a few references to these claims. What I'm seeking is more deeply researched work/finding on pre-islamic arabia which validate any these claims. – Naveen May 10 '15 at 17:51
  • @AdityaK How is P.N Oak viewed in historical(non-marxist) circles? Is all his research completely discredited/fabricated or is there any genuine work that is widely acknowledges or has not been disproven? – Naveen May 10 '15 at 17:54
  • Not sure about this one. I'm unfamiliar with his work, but reading about his biography, some of his theories do sound a bit far fetched (e.g. regarding the Vatican). He does present some conceivable arguments about the Taj Mahal, which are circumstantial at best. Given the previous atrocities of the Mughal Empire, I wouldn't be surprised his ideas were true. However, it's going to be difficult to get any conclusive proof, I'm not aware of anyone else who has conducted research in this area. If the Indian government aren't going to cooperate, I can't see how any proof can be obtained either. – Aditya K May 11 '15 at 9:53

Kaaba has nothing to do with Hinduism.

Claims made by P.N. Oak:

  1. Vikramadithya's Empire extended up-to Arabia. He built a Shiva temple there.

  2. IN Sayar-Ul-Okul page No. 315, the author praised Vikramadithya.

  3. Gold dish of King Vikramadithya found inside Kaaba


  1. Vikramadithya's Empire never extended Up-to Arabia. Bhavishya Purana says about his empire here:


In the west the other bank of the Sindhu River; in the South the Setu; Badarinarayana in the Himalayas formed the North limit and the city of Kapilavastu, the boundary in the East. These were the limits of Vikramaditya's Empire.

2.There is no such thing called Sayar-Ul-Okul. It is a lie made by P.N.Oak. If this is available, the PDF of Sayar-Ul-Okul can be found online.

3.No inscriptions of Vikramadithya found in Kaaba.

It was circulated by pagans because they believed that all planetary deities(7) revolving around the Earth.Muslims would say like it was circulated by Abraham.

Cheraman Perumal was a saivite Saint, he was one among 63 Nayanmars. He lived in late 8th century and early 9th century, who couldn't meet founder of Islam

Kabaleeswarar Temple was built in 7th century AD. But the name Kaaba was given to it much before 7th century AD.

They not only worshiped Allat, Aluzza and Manat, they worshiped them along with other many deities.

| improve this answer | |

We cannot provide a conclusive evidence against this as of now because:

  1. Kaaba is the holy place of muslims and non-muslims are not allowed to enter. Hence it would be impossible for non-muslims to verify the above claims without visiting the site.
  2. Kaaba is currently the holy place of muslims and finding an answer will involve repercussions for world peace. Even though truth must come out as soon as possible.
  3. Shiva linga's description does not match with the description of Kaaba black stone.

Reference: Quora link

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    There are a billions of visitors to Haj, so its not impossible to gather data from eye-witness accounts. I wonder why historical studies have to be confused with communalism. It is a well know fact that Kaaba was a Pagan temple with 300+ idols before the Prophet destroyed them and established it as a Islamic prayer site, so the connections cannot be dismissed easily. Also, note that there was significant Hindu influence in the middle east(not just Pagan) well over 2 millenia ago with the Mitanni Kingdom of Syria. – Naveen Dec 2 '15 at 14:38

Denying everything P.N. Oak said with proof is rediculous . there are sanskrit inscriptions n Kaaba still present . The depression in a Mosque is in the shape of a perfect Linga - only its concave & linga's convex. Revolving enmass produce -ve energy whereas in temples it is clockwise . The Prophet's Uncle was a Idol carver & Muhammed worked & traded under him . when he was shunted out of Medina , his target was to conquer Mecca with a reciprocating religion . The rituals inside the kaaba's certainly in vedic style . Hence there's truth and connection between the Kaaba & Shiva linga

| improve this answer | |

The referred theories are good for spinning the masses in terms of material world. Genuine seekers of truth should orient themselves towards God and seek him rather than worrying about these theories.

Similar popular venomous theory is spun on Hindus using the Aryan theory, which does not exist.

It is a fact that Hinduism extended up to today's Iran and might have some influence in today's middle east. Middle east during those times had scant population and technically it was not possible to build temples in those referred areas of today's Saudi Arabia, for key temples were always built in populated areas of those days.

To conclude, the referred theory does not hold water, other than Internet forums.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    One should analyse the evidence and come out with solid rebuttals or ignore the theory altogether if it is not to ones liking. Using adjectives like 'venomous' is not very helpful for those seeking to dispassionately study and question historical facts. There is sufficient evidence to warrant a thorough study of former Pagan sites like Madain Saleh in Saudi Arabia. – Naveen Dec 2 '15 at 14:45

I think, if we put Hinduism and Islam aside, and try to find a link we can find some thing. I think, in pre Islamic era there can be a connection (not ownership) that is historically been depicted wrongly. That link is mistaken and has been claimed that a Hindu king was an emperor when he wasn't. They never crossed the mountains of West (Balochistan, Iran), but trade routes were there.

We learned in our history that before Islam, Mecca was a trade hub. Most of the caravans came to this city to buy and sell goods. It is possible that a Gold dish or a dish was given as offering to the 360 Idols of Kaaba at that time. But remember, since the birth of Ibrahim (RA) there were no idols. He destroyed all of them including the three big idols. Islam came later. I don't find any claim of land over Kaaba to be true. Yes there can be a link, as there were other links from all over Arabian Peninsula and beyond.

| improve this answer | |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .