Satcitananda is the subjective experience of Brahman, so sat, cit and ananda point to the qualities of that experience rather than to qualities of Brahman.
Eg, Atma Bodha, verse 65:
"That all pervading, eternal blissful consciousness is seen within when one observes it through the eye of knowledge...."
Sat-chit-ananda is one thing not three. It is trying to capture the full essence of Brahman. It is the attributeless Brahman, the atoms of subjective reality (which is reality). It cannot be known and have attributes because it is also the knower.
I think that much is relatively uncontroversial.
Yes, Brahman is formless...without a center nor circumference. Sat (Existence), Chit (Consciousness), and Ananda (Bliss) are how we experience Brahman...in the absence of ignorance. These may be attributes, but not forms. Sat (Existence) and Chit (Consciousness) are also formless...with no center or circumference. Ananda (Bliss) appears to be a form, but ...
Summarized outline regarding the concept of mokṣa in all the six systems of orthodox philosphy, according to a study on the Yogasutras:
According to ancient Mīmāṃsā philosophers, heaven was the highest attainment (mokṣa) of human life. One can get all the pleasures and the highest bliss in the heaven. Heaven can be attained by the yāgas, ...
Even though it appears as something weird to followers of Madhvacharya, this particular has a point and a sense hidden it.
Points that clearly denote acharya Madhva's ideology is same as Islam:-
Acharya Madhva's friendship with Jalaluddin khilji.
Acharya Madhva saying Muslim God and Narayana are same.
Acharya Madhva accepting Allah as Vishnu.
Acharya Madhva ...