Timeline for How to interpret Bhasyas of Madhidhara for Vajasaneyi Samhita 23.19-31 ? His Bhasyas look too vulgar
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2023 at 22:15 | comment | added | Vijay Sharma | "...demean Vedas.." -- even if Vedas contain language implying insertion of a dead horse's organ into a human Queen's orifice, why do you automatically presume that it would be demeaning to our scriptures? I hope you realize you are using an Abrahamic lens when looking at the Vedas. Beastiality was more or less heard of and not uncommon in the ancient era. Our puranas reported it a few times through Rushis. Even today, esp in Middle East, people ocassionaly engage in it. Just because Abrahamic outlook thinks that is unbecoming of a human doesn't mean orientals view it the same way. | |
| Aug 28, 2023 at 12:15 | comment | added | Amritendu Mukhopadhyay | @অনু Dayananda gave this new interpretation. This translation can be found in Tulsiram's and Lekharam's translations. | |
| Apr 21, 2023 at 7:06 | history | edited | hello | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| Apr 21, 2023 at 7:04 | history | edited | hello | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 98 characters in body
|
| Apr 19, 2023 at 17:04 | comment | added | অনু | It would be appreciated if you added the name of the translator & publisher of the book whose screenshot you have given. | |
| Apr 19, 2023 at 12:45 | review | Late answers | |||
| Apr 19, 2023 at 14:22 | |||||
| Apr 19, 2023 at 12:41 | history | edited | hello | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 91 characters in body
|
| S Apr 19, 2023 at 12:23 | review | First answers | |||
| Apr 19, 2023 at 14:22 | |||||
| S Apr 19, 2023 at 12:23 | history | answered | hello | CC BY-SA 4.0 |