2

What is the punishment for a lusting on female relatives especially father's sister in smritis and itiHasas? Please dont use chatgpt or ai as i am not finding even one verse mentioned in ai in actual books..please help me.. I am looking for verses which describe penance and punishment..

10
  • Are you looking for prayaschitta? The mind can be cleansed from any sin only by daily meditation (for long hours for faster purification).
    – Harihara
    Commented Aug 10 at 13:53
  • No Sir manu smriti says such a person should be killed hence i want to know if there are any other smritis that give any other atonement🙏🏻
    – Harsh
    Commented Aug 10 at 14:10
  • 🙏See if this helps: hinduism.stackexchange.com/a/19133/34973
    – Harihara
    Commented Aug 10 at 15:31
  • Which verse from manusmriti? can you please tell me? Commented Aug 11 at 2:14
  • @Hari Hara sir I am asking about lustful thoughts not actual intercourse
    – Harsh
    Commented Aug 11 at 3:48

1 Answer 1

4

There is no punishment for bad thoughts. Sin only accrues to sinful deeds and not thoughts. Think of a chess game. You may be calculating long sequences of moves. Those thoughts will not matter. Only actual movement of pieces will be officially considered.

Parikshit, who was like a honey-bee in grasping the essential good in everything, abstained from killing Kali, because there is one great excellence pertaining to his age – whatever good you do fructifies immediately, but not so the evil deeds; and besides, in Kali’s age sin accrues only to sinful deeds and not to sinful thoughts. Kali is like one who is cowardly before the brave, but brave before the cowardly. He holds no fear for the good, but like a wolf he is always vigilant and alert to pounce upon those who are thoughtless and unobservant.

Srimad Bhagavata Purana translated by Swami Tapasyananda I.18.7

I checked the on line translation given in vedabase after reading the comment.

ŚB 1.18.7

नानुद्वेष्टि कलिं सम्राट् सारङ्ग इव सारभुक् । कुशलान्याशु सिद्ध्यन्ति नेतराणि कृतानि यत् ॥ ७ ॥ nānudveṣṭi kaliṁ samrāṭ sāraṅga iva sāra-bhuk kuśalāny āśu siddhyanti netarāṇi kṛtāni yat

Synonyms

na — never; anudveṣṭi — envious; kalim — unto the personality of Kali; samrāṭ — the Emperor; sāram-ga — realist, like the bees; iva — like; sāra-bhuk — one who accepts the substance; kuśalāni — auspicious objects; āśu — immediately; siddhyanti — become successful; na — never; itarāṇi — which are inauspicious; kṛtāni — being performed; yat — as much as.

Translation

Mahārāja Parīkṣit was a realist, like the bees who only accept the essence [of a flower]. He knew perfectly well that in this Age of Kali, auspicious things produce good effects immediately, whereas inauspicious acts must be actually performed [to render effects]. So he was never envious of the personality of Kali.

Vedabase translation (https://vedabase.io/en/library/sb/1/18/7/)

It also says that bad acts must be actually performed to be effective. The implication is that sinful thoughts do not lead to sin.

5
  • The Bhagavatam sanskrit shloka does not mention that sinful thoughts are not sin..Please quote some other source..thanks
    – Harsh
    Commented Aug 11 at 5:45
  • Thanks sir please quote some more verses and sources
    – Harsh
    Commented Aug 11 at 7:20
  • Isnt lusting itself an act?
    – Harsh
    Commented Aug 11 at 9:44
  • Read the purport in the vedabase link provided above please. Also related: hinduism.stackexchange.com/questions/34037/…
    – Harihara
    Commented Aug 11 at 14:56
  • I don't know of other sources. Some additional sources are given in the question mentioned in another comment. Just lusting is not an act. Commented Aug 11 at 16:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .