Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Krishna is considered Brahman by sects like Gaudiya Vaishnavism etc, while others consider Him as the eighth incarnation among ten principle incarnations (Sanskrit दशावतार, IAST daśāvatāra) of Lord Vishnu. Use this tag to the questions that are concerned anything with Krishna
3
votes
6
answers
1k
views
Does Lord Vishnu really look like as shown in images?
Like human form as a blue skinned deity . Having four arms , and very beautiful form.
Does Lord vishnu really look like this , or is this metaphor ?
metaphor as in 4 arms means omnipotence of Brahman …
0
votes
4
answers
711
views
Parbrahman was the real author of Bhagvad Gita and Krishna was the mere medium? [duplicate]
So it means, the real source of Bhagvad Gita is Parbrahman, not Vishnu or Krishna . Am I right ?
so everytime , it seems Sri Krishna is saying "I am .... … Now Mahabharata (incl BG) was written by Krishna Dwaipayan (Ved vyasa) , so why we attribute BG to Sri Krishna when he's just being messenger of god ? …